Consciousness == multimodal topological (or if you prefer, geometric) resolution.

It’s easy to understand consciousness as a 360 display when you realize all sensation are seamlessly tiling the ‘center’

Hypothesis: Through metametacognition-mediated “meta volition”, sometimes known as ‘siddha’ in cultural terms, the imagination can map to, extend to, and manipulate classical mechanic physics on various scales ⚖️ via information-theoretic message-passing with higher-than-Gaussian network efficiency.🧬

That’s the idea I remind you that: what if doing partial differential equations by hand gave people an immense yet manageable sense of pleasure or at least some form of ASMR? This would encourage them to continue computing, killing 2 🐦🐤 with 1 🪨

How we get from controlling inverted double pendulums to controlling the ensemble of complexity that facilitates our experience as qualia configurations (the nervous system) is my dream work, the stuff of cybernetics-based MD PhD programs (for now, I’m on a smaller scale of science)

Which stance in philosophy of mind is empirically and metaphysically most parsimonious?

I roll around in bed at night wondering if this thing is a channel or interface rather than a ‘generator’ or ‘orchestrator’ of consciousness.

Neuroscience solely for neural engineering of cyborg-AGI symbiosis