Steve Shea
@neuroshea.bsky.social
940 followers 230 following 170 posts
PI at CSHL. Olfaction, audition, and autism. @sheacshl @[email protected] Discogs: http://bit.ly/2xlZLbJ Opinions here are mine alone.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
neuroshea.bsky.social
A heads up as this site grows: some accounts may not be who they appear. Even among other scientists. Don’t let down your guard when following someone back.
neuroshea.bsky.social
How about launching a meme coin to fund my lab fully with anonymous donors? Is that cool?
neuroshea.bsky.social
I wasn't sure what you meant until I got to this part:
neuroshea.bsky.social
This article is some of the worst "both sides" trash I
have ever seen. It's written to hide the ball from the reader - just have a look at this graph. www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
neuroshea.bsky.social
C’mon bro. It’s not exactly subtle. It doesn’t even require a rudimentary grasp of irony, just 4th grade level reading comprehension.
neuroshea.bsky.social
Awesome! Congratulations Needhi!
neuroshea.bsky.social
@drugmonkey.bsky.social 14 equally contributing authors. This has to be a new record, right? www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
www.biorxiv.org
Reposted by Steve Shea
Reposted by Steve Shea
neuroshea.bsky.social
Does anyone know anything about what is going on at NIDCD?Council met almost a month ago and I have a top scored grant just waiting to be funded. The whole institute has only issued 6 NOAs since then. I have no information about my grant.
neuroshea.bsky.social
I took the “no” position. I think they have become far more annoying and pretentious than they were 15-20 years ago, but she thinks they were always this insufferable.
neuroshea.bsky.social
Having an argument right now with @alisa-shea.bsky.social about whether Arcade Fire has “always been like this.”
neuroshea.bsky.social
1) is nihilism. How could we ever know anything? And 2) we have plenty of examples of manipulating representations in ways that seem as though they would satisfy your objection. This sounds strange to us, because these issues aren't really up for debate among neuroscientists.
neuroshea.bsky.social
1) the fact that there is inference in most biological data, so it is filtered through our instruments and we can never really observe most things and 2) your contention that you can’t manipulate a neural representation with external forces.
neuroshea.bsky.social
Please correct me if I am misreading, but it sounds like you are making a legalistic argument about whether you are ontologically committed to the existence of representations based on:
neuroshea.bsky.social
I can’t believe I’m actually saying this, because I hate the terminology, but you should really have a look at the hippocampal “engram” work by Steve Ramirez and others. Checks all of T & P’s criteria in one stroke. More thoughts after I finish reading your paper.
neuroshea.bsky.social
"Who are you going to believe? Me or your lying instruments?" Also, when the vanguard of your repertoire of scientific examples is somatotopy and delay period activity in working memory tasks, maybe try reading some neuroscience from the past 40 years.
Reposted by Steve Shea
docbecca.bsky.social
If you call yourself a scientist but willingly admit to being unable to evaluate a preprint (something I teach my undergrads to do) then you need to stop calling yourself a scientist.
needhibhalla.bsky.social
There is a lot I disagree with here but perhaps this most of all: “I’ve interviewed dozens of scientists who don’t know how to evaluate preprints, what they can trust, or what they can use in their own research.”
ecologistgreen.bsky.social
Who’s with me? #PeerReview ensures the integrity of scientific knowledge.

Science isn’t social media, and it’s dangerous to treat it as such. For this reason, I believe preprints serve an anti-science agenda & threaten our fields.

Check out my editorial in @ScholarlyKitchen.bsky.social.

🧪 #SciPub
neuroshea.bsky.social
I totally agree, but all the PI's not fired trainees are now completely screwed and have to "explore reassignment options," acting as a force multiplier for the carnage.
neuroshea.bsky.social
Who are these people? This is unacceptable. “We’re the police” OK sure
paleofuture.bsky.social
A different angle showing the kidnapping of Runeysa Ozturk by U.S. secret police in Massachusetts.

(via Daniel Boguslaw on Twitter) x.com/DRBoguslaw/s...
Reposted by Steve Shea
paleofuture.bsky.social
Video of the international student at Tufts being arrested by "federal authorities" in Massachusetts has been released and it's terrifying.

They're not even uniformed officers. Just secret police thugs in hoodies and masks.

From WCVB: youtu.be/PuFIs7OkzYY
Reposted by Steve Shea
rincewind.run
Micah @rincewind.run · Mar 25
the speed at which these guys have broken everything has given a lot of folks who should know better the impression that they are an unstoppable force and the only option is to negotiate the terms of surrender

just because the clown car goes very fast does not mean it isn’t full of clowns
whstancil.bsky.social
Whatever the immediate fallout of the scandal, what is going to stick around is the impression it gives, of hapless idiots doing ridiculous things. And I think that seriously reduces the appeal of capitulating to these jokers.