NSTAAFP On This Platform
@nielsbasement.bsky.social
No Such Thing As Facts
With that handle, what else would you be doing 😁
January 31, 2026 at 7:48 PM
With that handle, what else would you be doing 😁
Assuming the god guys win
January 18, 2026 at 5:24 PM
Assuming the god guys win
Überhol halt nich rechts
January 18, 2026 at 5:17 PM
Überhol halt nich rechts
This should not be in the news. Plenty of good people were right c***s at school... Have the grace and extend him the same curtesy you extend to them. Focussing on his being a c*** back then is only diverting attention from what a massive c*** he is being at present
December 28, 2025 at 3:41 PM
This should not be in the news. Plenty of good people were right c***s at school... Have the grace and extend him the same curtesy you extend to them. Focussing on his being a c*** back then is only diverting attention from what a massive c*** he is being at present
Playing with it reduces the hunting instincts
December 11, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Playing with it reduces the hunting instincts
Well that's just being sensible.
December 5, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Well that's just being sensible.
Again, not my point. I don't disagree with the broadcast's core message but this edit was demonstrably skewed and deliberately made in such a way that disguised the editing. I might be naive and all my news are edited in such a fashion but I'd prefer my news as unbiased as possible.
November 11, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Again, not my point. I don't disagree with the broadcast's core message but this edit was demonstrably skewed and deliberately made in such a way that disguised the editing. I might be naive and all my news are edited in such a fashion but I'd prefer my news as unbiased as possible.
I agree... so why edit the footage in such a way? It opens the BBC up to legitimate questioning of their reporting thereby casting doubts on the validity of their assertion that Trump incited violence. That is why the edit is problematic.
November 11, 2025 at 4:53 PM
I agree... so why edit the footage in such a way? It opens the BBC up to legitimate questioning of their reporting thereby casting doubts on the validity of their assertion that Trump incited violence. That is why the edit is problematic.
That wasn't my question though.
November 11, 2025 at 4:34 PM
That wasn't my question though.
An organisation intentionally uses misleading editing to misrepresent the news, creating a skewed perception of reality in its viewership that pays for its unbiased reporting and you don't mind? What if they had used editing to make Trump look good? You'd be fine with that as well?
November 11, 2025 at 4:17 PM
An organisation intentionally uses misleading editing to misrepresent the news, creating a skewed perception of reality in its viewership that pays for its unbiased reporting and you don't mind? What if they had used editing to make Trump look good? You'd be fine with that as well?
Doesn't anyone find the BBC's edit problematic?
November 10, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Doesn't anyone find the BBC's edit problematic?
Ah... that. Thought it'd be sth. clever like that.
October 22, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Ah... that. Thought it'd be sth. clever like that.
What??? How does that comment fit in this conversation?
October 22, 2025 at 6:00 PM
What??? How does that comment fit in this conversation?
Fine... I'll concede the legitimacy of walking over cars... the morality still seems questionable
October 22, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Fine... I'll concede the legitimacy of walking over cars... the morality still seems questionable
OK, let's continue then. We need more data. How far is the car parked on the pavement? four tires or two? How far does it encroach on the pedestrians freedom of movement? These things need to be considered. 😁
October 22, 2025 at 5:42 PM
OK, let's continue then. We need more data. How far is the car parked on the pavement? four tires or two? How far does it encroach on the pedestrians freedom of movement? These things need to be considered. 😁
Are you really trying to have a serious conversation about somebody's hypothetical fess?
October 22, 2025 at 5:38 PM
Are you really trying to have a serious conversation about somebody's hypothetical fess?
Either way... the fess stated right of way as legitimizing factor
October 22, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Either way... the fess stated right of way as legitimizing factor
Might have broken down
October 22, 2025 at 5:34 PM
Might have broken down
By that logic a car may run over you should you trip whilst crossing the road
October 22, 2025 at 5:29 PM
By that logic a car may run over you should you trip whilst crossing the road