Nigel Caplan
@nigelc.bsky.social
980 followers 710 following 350 posts
Professor @ Univ of Delaware: ESL, education, linguistics. Focused on teacher-training for multilingual learners. Also SFL, ungrading, resisting AI. Newish books: ESSENTIAL ACTIONS and GENRE EXPLAINED. www.nigelcaplan.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
nigelc.bsky.social
Yes I believe that is the term in functional linguistics. It's much more helpful actually!
nigelc.bsky.social
Words matter but so does knowing how the truth is being concealed (passive) and who is doing it (active). Here endeth today's grammar lecture.
nigelc.bsky.social
The problem is the use of intransitive verbs (possibly ergative since one cannot land oneself after having been bodily launched by said agents). Passive voice implies agency (and directly states the agent if there's a by phrase). So it's often *more* transparent than using intrans/ergative active vb
nigelc.bsky.social
Just saw a great ad on here for my linguistics courses. Apparently "she landed on the ground" is passive voice but "she was thrown to the ground by federal agents" is not. Yes, it's lousy writing but the first is active and the second clause is actually psssive.
nigelc.bsky.social
"This settlement sends a clear message to the Big Tech companies splashing generative A.I. over every app and page and program: You are not above the law. And it should signal to consumers everywhere that A.I. isn’t an unstoppable tsunami about to overwhelm us." < Bravo to this!
nigelc.bsky.social
I'm not a lawyer, just a writer whose work was stolen and an educator trying to do my job, but I wish they'd actually brought down Anthropic. We don't need "AI." We do need creators.
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/29/o...
Opinion | I Sued Anthropic, and the Unthinkable Happened
www.nytimes.com
nigelc.bsky.social
I appreciate universities who tell me so clearly where not to send my son's tuition dollars. First major school to announce its education is 100% human will clean up. Come on, Delaware. After 250 years, it's time to be the first state again
nigelc.bsky.social
I needed a good laugh. It is not indicative of a "restrictive worldview" to describe this column as a steaming pile of narrow minded, linguistically flawed, old man shouting at the wind bullshit

www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/o...
Opinion | Why Does Everybody Swear All The Time Now?
www.nytimes.com
nigelc.bsky.social
Ask yourself ... if you were a 12th grader today with <gestures in 2025> around you, how seriously would you take a test with these parameters? Really?
nigelc.bsky.social
NYT blames public health measures during the first year of the covid pandemic, because of course they do. That was 4 years before last year's 12 graders took the test. The changes over the last decade are actually quite small - in fact only 2 points +/- in reading from 2019 to 2024.
nigelc.bsky.social
Happy hysterical ed reporting day, to all who celebrate. A few reminders about NAEP: it tests a sample of students, not all of them. Each student takes a part of the test, not the whole thing. The test is inconsequential to the student, teacher, and school. And it's not based on any curriculum.
nigelc.bsky.social
Something important missed from the article - while Haidt is probably wrong to say that tech has caused a decline in learning/school performance/etc, a more salient observation is that it is has absolutely failed to realize any measurable *benefits* despite decades of hype (cf Watters, etc.)
nigelc.bsky.social
This is a well balanced piece, but I think we can actually find consensus (well, Haidt can't b/c its not in his self interest): we need to divest from most ed-tech because many reasons while still teaching digital and media literacy. Just doing it more on paper. www.tes.com/magazine/tea...
Is Jonathan Haidt right about smartphones?
In ‘The Anxious Generation’, Haidt makes the case that social media and smartphones have ‘rewired’ today’s teenagers, but his critics say the evidence tells us something very different - and that bann...
www.tes.com
nigelc.bsky.social
Funny how the tech hypists are so close to understanding: yes, if every "AI" company followed the law in collecting training data, they would be unable to develop their products and make $$$ (exactly, they shouldn't); if every author sued, they would destroy these predators (we should)
bcmerchant.bsky.social
Thanks for the reminder!
Your message was sent successfully. Please be aware that the Statute of Limitations (the deadline imposed by law within which you may bring a lawsuit) may severely limit the time remaining for you to file any potential claims you may have. Please also note that we cannot serve as your counsel in any matter unless you and our firm expressly agree, in writing, that we will serve as your attorney. Thank you again for your inquiry.
nigelc.bsky.social
I don't understand why the Authors' Guild would give these corporations a lifeline. They broke the law. They are harming people. They are wrong. We are right. Take them down. Reject the deal.
knibbs.bsky.social
NEW: A major AI copyright legal showdown just took a huge twist today. Facing a class action on behalf of book authors that could've seen it pay over a TRILLION in damages for alleged piracy, Anthropic has agreed to settle instead: www.wired.com/story/anthro...
Anthropic Settles High-Profile AI Copyright Lawsuit Brought By Book Authors
Anthropic faced the prospect of more than $1 trillion in damages, a sum that could have threatened the company’s survival if the case went to trial.
www.wired.com
nigelc.bsky.social
Yes, this. As a wonderful Professor of medieval French literature used to tells, we need to beware of the modern tendency to patronize the middle ages. www.nytimes.com/2025/08/26/o...
Opinion | The University’s Best Weapon Against A.I.: The 14th Century
www.nytimes.com
nigelc.bsky.social
Gift link this time (finally found the right button!): "we can use subtitles to rate the out-loud-ness of any English word by comparing its popularity in movies to its popularity in books." - err, sure. That's a thing in corpus linguistics, right? Right?
wapo.st/4oLF7Is
Column | What are the most American and most British words?
Is American English really that different than its British ancestor? And if so, what words truly separate the American from the Brit? The Department of Data is on the case.
wapo.st
nigelc.bsky.social
I'm glad WaPo is drawing attention to the hypocrisy and racism at the heart of the administration's chaotic approach to multilingual learners, but yet again I am begging them to talk to an actual expert so they can frame language acquisition as an asset not a deficit. wapo.st/4nfNKcX
Opinion | The Trump administration’s funny way of promoting English
If assimilation is the goal, why not make sure kids get every opportunity to learn our language?
wapo.st
nigelc.bsky.social
See my previous post. Shot and chaser! Well said
lynneguist.bsky.social
Word I should use more:

grammaticaster: a pretender to or a smatterer in the art of grammar, without being really skilful (Dythe & Pardon's New English Dictionary, 1735)

In a sentence:
Grammaticasters in the media make strong claims despite their unsubtle analysis of the language.
grammaticaster (s.) a pretender to or a smatterer in the art of grammar, without being really skilful