for me it also figured out by itself that it could work around it by using [] instead of <> just from telling it twice that it failed and executed the tool call instead of showing it
December 9, 2025 at 6:53 PM
for me it also figured out by itself that it could work around it by using [] instead of <> just from telling it twice that it failed and executed the tool call instead of showing it
Hmm how are they lining up the rotation speed so well with the frame rate?
November 26, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Hmm how are they lining up the rotation speed so well with the frame rate?
but
chairs already have legs
chairs already have legs
November 5, 2025 at 7:01 PM
but
chairs already have legs
chairs already have legs
It seems most accurate to me to say that it's a non-function value that becomes a function in Core
September 28, 2025 at 11:53 PM
It seems most accurate to me to say that it's a non-function value that becomes a function in Core
apparently the idea was that it's supposed to look like the usage site, which is also why you have `int values[]` instead of `int[] values`.
luckily we've moved past that in other languages
luckily we've moved past that in other languages
September 22, 2025 at 9:58 AM
apparently the idea was that it's supposed to look like the usage site, which is also why you have `int values[]` instead of `int[] values`.
luckily we've moved past that in other languages
luckily we've moved past that in other languages
Yes here it is: 🐠 no wait
September 8, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Yes here it is: 🐠 no wait
tbh the radicals are usually easy enough to remember that it's not a big cost, like a tiny fraction of the overall WK time
August 24, 2025 at 5:02 AM
tbh the radicals are usually easy enough to remember that it's not a big cost, like a tiny fraction of the overall WK time
interesting, it seems counterintuitive that moving entire atoms would be better than just moving electrons
August 23, 2025 at 1:08 PM
interesting, it seems counterintuitive that moving entire atoms would be better than just moving electrons
FWIW you can disable that, as well (in regedit, in Computer\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Search, there needs to be a dword key "BingSearchEnabled" with value 0)
June 16, 2025 at 3:52 PM
FWIW you can disable that, as well (in regedit, in Computer\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Search, there needs to be a dword key "BingSearchEnabled" with value 0)
fyi you can disable it under custom instructions (and then still turn it on whenever you actually need it by tapping on the +)
June 16, 2025 at 12:14 AM
fyi you can disable it under custom instructions (and then still turn it on whenever you actually need it by tapping on the +)
It seems plausible that the screendoor effect creates void that your brain assumes have the correct detail, whereas in the pixelated version your brain is forced to accept the detail the image provides in those voids
May 26, 2025 at 8:43 PM
It seems plausible that the screendoor effect creates void that your brain assumes have the correct detail, whereas in the pixelated version your brain is forced to accept the detail the image provides in those voids
That happened to my phone; I bought a wireless charging pad to be able to continue charging it
May 18, 2025 at 6:33 PM
That happened to my phone; I bought a wireless charging pad to be able to continue charging it
It seems possible that they did google it but decided the correct version was too complex
May 2, 2025 at 4:25 PM
It seems possible that they did google it but decided the correct version was too complex
That's an unboxed tuple ghc.gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/doc/user...
6.16. Unboxed types and primitive operations — Glasgow Haskell Compiler 9.13.20250428 User's Guide
ghc.gitlab.haskell.org
April 29, 2025 at 11:06 AM
That's an unboxed tuple ghc.gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/doc/user...
it's a weird coincidence because I was wondering about this just a couple hours ago
April 17, 2025 at 2:19 PM
it's a weird coincidence because I was wondering about this just a couple hours ago