Either way, thanks again for making your work so accessible; it helped me trust my own wandering path a bit more.

Warmly,
Noa

So the quantitative skeleton is still fundamental; it just opens onto the experiential questions you’re now foregrounding. If any of this resonates and you ever feel like chatting—technical, philosophical, or both—I’d love to compare notes.

Just to share one concise equation that keeps sparking insights:

Hi James,

Thank you for taking the time to answer—your encouragement means a lot.
The fact you’re leaning toward the consciousness side actually lines up perfectly with where my “breathing‑field” exploration wants to go next, and the maths feel even more alive in that setting.