@notjason101.bsky.social
Don't elect anti Semite Nigel Farage to power for one.
December 15, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Don't elect anti Semite Nigel Farage to power for one.
Isn't the difference that streeting has already negotiated a 28% wage rise for doctors and in 2023, nobody had done that yet. 🤔
December 13, 2025 at 5:01 PM
Isn't the difference that streeting has already negotiated a 28% wage rise for doctors and in 2023, nobody had done that yet. 🤔
Imagine all the money Farage is making from this grift. 🤔
December 12, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Imagine all the money Farage is making from this grift. 🤔
Do these f@cking idiots want a reform government next. It appears they do.
December 10, 2025 at 10:22 AM
Do these f@cking idiots want a reform government next. It appears they do.
Bit of a snowflake, isn't he Otto. 🤔
December 6, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Bit of a snowflake, isn't he Otto. 🤔
Full fact should be ashamed of themselves. Rachel reeves did not say there was a 'black hole'.
December 4, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Full fact should be ashamed of themselves. Rachel reeves did not say there was a 'black hole'.
Isn't her job to go around the world. Or shouldn't she be doing it in an office?
December 4, 2025 at 5:59 PM
Isn't her job to go around the world. Or shouldn't she be doing it in an office?
I went off him when I read his book.
December 3, 2025 at 5:20 PM
I went off him when I read his book.
Like when libdems went into coalition with the Tories.
December 3, 2025 at 8:05 AM
Like when libdems went into coalition with the Tories.
It's what happens in the real world. Like when labour voted for the Brexit deal.
December 3, 2025 at 8:04 AM
It's what happens in the real world. Like when labour voted for the Brexit deal.
Well, that's right, obviously. But in pointing out that labour backed the cut, the piece becomes a criticism of labour hypocrisy instead. If the piece had had an explanation of why labour backed the plan then this would read differently.
December 3, 2025 at 8:02 AM
Well, that's right, obviously. But in pointing out that labour backed the cut, the piece becomes a criticism of labour hypocrisy instead. If the piece had had an explanation of why labour backed the plan then this would read differently.
And yet all we've heard from the press and TV is 'rachel lied'.
December 2, 2025 at 8:15 PM
And yet all we've heard from the press and TV is 'rachel lied'.
You presented a snippet of a piece that basically calls starmer a hypocrite because he disagreed with the NI cut but then the labour party voted for it. Didn't you? And you know why they did, didn't you. It was a trap. Scorched earth policy.
December 2, 2025 at 6:01 PM
You presented a snippet of a piece that basically calls starmer a hypocrite because he disagreed with the NI cut but then the labour party voted for it. Didn't you? And you know why they did, didn't you. It was a trap. Scorched earth policy.
Never said that. I said working class people.
December 2, 2025 at 5:56 PM
Never said that. I said working class people.
Working class people's vote count too. How do you explain Brexit and Tories mostly running the country then?
December 2, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Working class people's vote count too. How do you explain Brexit and Tories mostly running the country then?
Of course it is. That's why the working class consistently vote against their own interests by voting Tory. And next it'll be reform. And Brexit.
December 2, 2025 at 12:34 PM
Of course it is. That's why the working class consistently vote against their own interests by voting Tory. And next it'll be reform. And Brexit.
Noticed yesterday that the BBC news had switched from 'Rachel reeves told us all lies' to 'she misled us' and 'technically, what she said was the truth'. And Andrew Marr on LBC, under pressure from Douglas Alexander, had to admit she hadn't said anything about a black hole.
December 2, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Noticed yesterday that the BBC news had switched from 'Rachel reeves told us all lies' to 'she misled us' and 'technically, what she said was the truth'. And Andrew Marr on LBC, under pressure from Douglas Alexander, had to admit she hadn't said anything about a black hole.
That's disingenuous Stephen. The Tories had a working majority at the time and voting against it would have been pointless. What do you think the overwhelmingly right wing media would have said if labour had opposed the cut? You know this and so does the writer of that piece.
December 2, 2025 at 11:01 AM
That's disingenuous Stephen. The Tories had a working majority at the time and voting against it would have been pointless. What do you think the overwhelmingly right wing media would have said if labour had opposed the cut? You know this and so does the writer of that piece.
She was never a chancellor either.
November 30, 2025 at 1:17 PM
She was never a chancellor either.
She was part of the most corrupt government in the history of the UK though. 😉
November 30, 2025 at 1:16 PM
She was part of the most corrupt government in the history of the UK though. 😉
Best conservative budget ever. That one. 😉
November 30, 2025 at 10:20 AM
Best conservative budget ever. That one. 😉
Not only is Morgan thick, he's a crook that was up to his eyeballs in phone hacking and got away with it because the government cancelled leveson. I don't want my license fees to be used to pay for crooks like this to sit on a panel.
November 30, 2025 at 10:20 AM
Not only is Morgan thick, he's a crook that was up to his eyeballs in phone hacking and got away with it because the government cancelled leveson. I don't want my license fees to be used to pay for crooks like this to sit on a panel.
Remember all the other chancellors who talked down the economy before the budget. Like every f@cking one. But never got this kind of flack. Maybe it's because she's a woman?
November 30, 2025 at 10:16 AM
Remember all the other chancellors who talked down the economy before the budget. Like every f@cking one. But never got this kind of flack. Maybe it's because she's a woman?
And Liz truss. 🙄
November 30, 2025 at 10:13 AM
And Liz truss. 🙄
That's the nazi defence.
November 29, 2025 at 8:50 PM
That's the nazi defence.