Nye Cominetti
@nyecominetti.bsky.social
2K followers 560 following 440 posts
At Resolution Foundation covering labour market, low pay, living wage.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
nyecominetti.bsky.social
Good excuse to post one of my favourite silly skits youtube.com/clip/UgkxDZK...
nyecominetti.bsky.social
Will have to put it on the list for next time. Thanks for all the thoughts, hopefully we (RF) can put together a fully worked distributional analysis at some point
nyecominetti.bsky.social
This isn't a perfect answer but if you look at retail + leisure+ hospitality (which is a pretty large share of MW employment) this is the breakdown of employment and consumption. Hence why I've generally been optimistic about that part of the distributional question
nyecominetti.bsky.social
Yes, true. Percent change is different, but maybe that's not the normal way to weigh up whether a policy is 'progressive' or not (as extreme example, I guess would sound odd to say giving every person in the country £10 is 'progressive')
nyecominetti.bsky.social
I don't think that accounts for household-specific consumption baskets (impacts on food prices etc), but given workers in poor households are more likely to work in low-paid sectors (like retail, hospitality etc) I don't *think* that would change the picture
nyecominetti.bsky.social
On distribution, my understanding was minimum wage increases are progressive, even if less so than many people would assume. e.g. see Fig 9 here ifs.org.uk/sites/defaul...
ifs.org.uk
nyecominetti.bsky.social
Agree re enforcement (and maybe tough enforcement would change the 'right' MW level).

On overall purpose, I'd say something like "raising low-paid workers' pay until costs outweigh benefits". Many potential costs ofc: prices, jobs, job quality, incentive to study/trian progress
nyecominetti.bsky.social
A counter arg might be that the evidence never will be there - hard for studies to pick out impacts from steady annual increases. But that's a pretty strong line to take.

(I do of course agree with the separate point that the mw is FAR from the best way to help poor families)
nyecominetti.bsky.social
There are issues with ASHE non-response among SMEs that mean it's probably underestimating the coverage level, but not by a huge amount (estimate linked here is ~2 ppts). And trend is unlikely to be wrong - and that shows basically flat coverage since 2016 www.wagedynamics.com/wp-content/u...
www.wagedynamics.com
nyecominetti.bsky.social
I did music reviews a bit at Uni, so I know it's tricky to get the tone right, but this is quite something from Pitchfork
nyecominetti.bsky.social
Yes will forward it along. Genuinely though, the person had some rousing sentences! Would prefer them to the ~30% who were clearly using chat gpt
nyecominetti.bsky.social
Have scored quite a few AI-ridden job applications so would like to applaud the person who went for "I'm not a rampant socialist" but "the wealth of the rich has been built on the blood and sweat of the workers"
nyecominetti.bsky.social
but if I understand correctly, only for firms with 5+ prior responses. Which *should* avoid any change in the sample this year. 😌 That will be a relief to the Low Pay Commission, who will get 2025 ASHE data next month, which they will need to plug straight into their minimum wage recommendation.
nyecominetti.bsky.social
3. ASHE data collection is moving online. A very sensible step, and will hopefully reduce non-responses from SMEs, a known problem. If that happens, will have a downwards effect on earnings estimates (because SMEs pay less). They say this already started with the 2025 data collection 😟...
nyecominetti.bsky.social
2. They have started a project to resolve the lack of coherence between LFS and admin data (PAYE) and business survey data (WFJ), and because of the above-mentioned issues with the LFS trend this year. That sounds promising !
nyecominetti.bsky.social
The blog acknowledges this. Good moment to remind you that RF continue to update our own employment rate estimates based on administrative jobs data ☺️https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/our-work/estimates-of-uk-employment/
nyecominetti.bsky.social
1. They expect LFS responses to keep rising (in waves 2-5) thanks to their methodology changes. That's good, but will affect LFS estimates, and I think means we can't place much weight on LFS employment trends until that process is complete - blog says from Q3.
Reposted by Nye Cominetti
resfoundation.bsky.social
The upcoming Budget presents various challenges.

@ruthcurtice.bsky.social explains our recommendations for reform and revenue raising ⤵️
nyecominetti.bsky.social
I've never managed to clear £100 myself. We don't tend to buy much drink for the house so my guess is we're looking at 30-40 tins
nyecominetti.bsky.social
Just got a monzo ping telling me my partner managed to spend £160 in Aldi. Hell of an effort! I assume they clapped her out of the shop