banner
olihiam.bsky.social
@olihiam.bsky.social
The more you talk the more I doubt your understanding of AI. You seem like you're romanticizing a lot of it, I have no energy to reply to everything you've stated, so Imma just go with agree to disagree.
September 6, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Oh... no... that comparison is awful. Please, look at how AI generates its output. It is, honestly, so easy to understand and you'll instantly understand that it's impossible for an LLM or any other AI today to actually think. They DO NOT THINK at all. Even when it says "thinking..." 🤣
September 6, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Again, what is a token? Go on, how does an LLM decide what its output is gonna be? If you can answer that for real then you can't also claim they're capable of thought and art.
September 6, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Are you daft? Do you even understand what the papers are talking about? It doesn't matter whether they're papers or not if you do not understand them lol you're parroting what x site/blog/article/paper says without actually understanding the underlying tech.
September 6, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Do you even know how tokens work? This is just sad and pathetic.
September 6, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Maybe you should understand the underlying tech instead of parroting what x site says. You claiming that an LLM is capable of anything you listed is proof of that. You're embarrassing yourself.
September 6, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Like I said... they're really good at seeming like the things you're talking about. They aren't actually thinking or doing these things. They also fake anxiety really good, depression, etc. The way they work doesn't allow them to think because all they are is numbers. Statistics.
September 6, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Ait, then. My bad bruzinski 🫡
September 6, 2025 at 2:31 PM
There are tons of materials for you to go through, some are even at a level meant for children (should do you nicely). Enjoy getting educated.
September 6, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Yeah, said by someone who hasn't the slightest idea how these AIs work in the slightest. They're not capable of anything you've said. They are just very advanced text prediction, stop embarrassing yourself. They aren't even new tech lol it's just that we have processing power for them now.
September 6, 2025 at 2:30 PM
What difference does it make if your rebuttal was against AI when you argued against specific forms of art? And not a single point was made with even the most basic application of logic...
September 6, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Doesn't seem like it after you argued against digital art and pianos?
September 6, 2025 at 1:48 PM
I think the question of "do we need x" is moronic in 99% of cases. Because drawing an arbitrary line of "need" is idiotic. AI, dumb as it is now, is still immensely useful. For example, AI has solved proteins. Which saved humanity hundreds of years. I will not get into it now, but google it.
September 6, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Of course. That question is nowhere in the ballpark of art, though. AI-generated images are not, and cannot, be art. Not until computers gain the ability to think. The current AI models are just super-efficient glorified autocorrect.
September 6, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Equating all digital art to furry porn is the same as equating all physical art to the very same. Physical art is filled with porn as well. On the piano masterpieces have been played and written for. Masterpieces that have stood the test of time. You're a fake.
September 6, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Completely braindead take made by someone who has no ability to appreciate art. Digital art is art nonetheless. The square you're talking about is, I assume, the famous blue square? Google it before you mention shit like that again. It is art. Art has transcended raw mechanical skill long ago.
September 6, 2025 at 1:36 PM
What do you count as "technology"? Even a hammer and nails are considered technology. So, where does it stop? At electronics? Y'all go live under a rock if that's what you truly desire. But posting about not needing tech on social media... the irony is almost palpable.
September 6, 2025 at 1:25 PM
What a moronic post. What do you mean by "don't need?" Why are you specifying stuff like "electronic music," "abstract expressionism," AND DIGITAL ART? And a lot of others, like piano??? Humans need art. It is as simple as that. We always have and always will. Without art, there is no humanity.
September 6, 2025 at 1:23 PM
I'm sorry, but for some reason, it just decided to post it without fully uploading the video!

In the video, it's explained that the image is made up of white, black, and turquoise pixels.
May 16, 2025 at 7:41 PM
And here's the screenshot. I whited him out so as to make sure that it's not a reflection of him that i'm seeing.

I even tried with white paper, and the red is still fairly visible!

What's going on? I thought that to see the red, our brains have to have the context of something red, no?
May 16, 2025 at 7:39 PM
Yes! That would be lovely 🙂‍↕️ Thank you for offering.
May 2, 2025 at 5:11 PM
I've never heard of it, actually 😅 I use Blender, and i used some 3D modeling software way back in the day, like SketchUp and a very tiny amount of Cinema4D.
As far as i see, Shapr3D seems to be targeted at 3D printers. Looks very clean, though. Will you be posting the results?
May 2, 2025 at 2:28 PM