@onlyall0saw.bsky.social
I’m what you might call a grown-assed queer nonbinary hyperfixated neurodivergent aroace individual. Actually yeah, that. Call me that, I guess.
Minors, DNI: grown folks are talking ^_^
Bluesky. Don’t become the thing we came here to avoid, wtf.
Minors, DNI: grown folks are talking ^_^
Bluesky. Don’t become the thing we came here to avoid, wtf.
Al is king of telling on himself and that shadow is his crown. It’s well done!
December 17, 2025 at 11:46 PM
Al is king of telling on himself and that shadow is his crown. It’s well done!
This is so gorgeous, wow. Great job!!
December 17, 2025 at 5:24 PM
This is so gorgeous, wow. Great job!!
His shadow!!! T-T
December 17, 2025 at 2:26 PM
His shadow!!! T-T
Welp. Woke the animals, thanks for that, lol.
“Manhood” actually is kind of off-putting to me … not better than schlong - but I’d be hard pressed to explain why. Experiential connotation, I guess?
“Hole” is also jarring to me for some reason - despite being very common.
“Manhood” actually is kind of off-putting to me … not better than schlong - but I’d be hard pressed to explain why. Experiential connotation, I guess?
“Hole” is also jarring to me for some reason - despite being very common.
December 16, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Welp. Woke the animals, thanks for that, lol.
“Manhood” actually is kind of off-putting to me … not better than schlong - but I’d be hard pressed to explain why. Experiential connotation, I guess?
“Hole” is also jarring to me for some reason - despite being very common.
“Manhood” actually is kind of off-putting to me … not better than schlong - but I’d be hard pressed to explain why. Experiential connotation, I guess?
“Hole” is also jarring to me for some reason - despite being very common.
Oh, and references to the business end: head, tip, slit- even “smear” evokes precum more than enough to signify.
Other end: groin, [noun] of pubic hair, pubes, hips, pelvis in some uses… not many but now I’m thinking about it, lol.
Positioning: seated, sheathed, flush (w/ass)
(This is fun!)
Other end: groin, [noun] of pubic hair, pubes, hips, pelvis in some uses… not many but now I’m thinking about it, lol.
Positioning: seated, sheathed, flush (w/ass)
(This is fun!)
December 16, 2025 at 6:38 AM
Oh, and references to the business end: head, tip, slit- even “smear” evokes precum more than enough to signify.
Other end: groin, [noun] of pubic hair, pubes, hips, pelvis in some uses… not many but now I’m thinking about it, lol.
Positioning: seated, sheathed, flush (w/ass)
(This is fun!)
Other end: groin, [noun] of pubic hair, pubes, hips, pelvis in some uses… not many but now I’m thinking about it, lol.
Positioning: seated, sheathed, flush (w/ass)
(This is fun!)
I see “length” a lot? Descriptions of motions instead of parts, references to one’s “arousal” or “hardness.” Different tone, but “prick?” Sillier: boner? dong?
The one that gets me is “prostate” - it’s so rare to see a reference that feels right. “Sweet spot” feels vague, idk.
The one that gets me is “prostate” - it’s so rare to see a reference that feels right. “Sweet spot” feels vague, idk.
December 16, 2025 at 6:30 AM
I see “length” a lot? Descriptions of motions instead of parts, references to one’s “arousal” or “hardness.” Different tone, but “prick?” Sillier: boner? dong?
The one that gets me is “prostate” - it’s so rare to see a reference that feels right. “Sweet spot” feels vague, idk.
The one that gets me is “prostate” - it’s so rare to see a reference that feels right. “Sweet spot” feels vague, idk.
I suspect not. There’s such a strong culture of context-free “you made a choice” rhetoric that it would be odd to have it coexist alongside ethical contract law.
I mean, it’s fundamentally owning a person, right?
Even in the other rings coercion is still legally binding. Like with Ozzie and Fizz
I mean, it’s fundamentally owning a person, right?
Even in the other rings coercion is still legally binding. Like with Ozzie and Fizz
December 15, 2025 at 7:24 PM
I suspect not. There’s such a strong culture of context-free “you made a choice” rhetoric that it would be odd to have it coexist alongside ethical contract law.
I mean, it’s fundamentally owning a person, right?
Even in the other rings coercion is still legally binding. Like with Ozzie and Fizz
I mean, it’s fundamentally owning a person, right?
Even in the other rings coercion is still legally binding. Like with Ozzie and Fizz
It’s not possible, of course, but imagine if the world just stopped saying his name. It’s the stamp he keeps leaving everywhere. If he died and no one even mentioned him afterward, I think his soul would disintegrate, wherever it is.
December 15, 2025 at 7:17 PM
It’s not possible, of course, but imagine if the world just stopped saying his name. It’s the stamp he keeps leaving everywhere. If he died and no one even mentioned him afterward, I think his soul would disintegrate, wherever it is.
Omg thank you for the reminder - I saw that and just - angels, amirite?
I think she and Sera might have that power especially since they’re watchers. I love that Emily is a cross between Sera and Lucifer - when’s not too depressed. Duty AND whimsy AND that angelic empathy-failure.
I think she and Sera might have that power especially since they’re watchers. I love that Emily is a cross between Sera and Lucifer - when’s not too depressed. Duty AND whimsy AND that angelic empathy-failure.
December 15, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Omg thank you for the reminder - I saw that and just - angels, amirite?
I think she and Sera might have that power especially since they’re watchers. I love that Emily is a cross between Sera and Lucifer - when’s not too depressed. Duty AND whimsy AND that angelic empathy-failure.
I think she and Sera might have that power especially since they’re watchers. I love that Emily is a cross between Sera and Lucifer - when’s not too depressed. Duty AND whimsy AND that angelic empathy-failure.
It’s a media literacy problem. I’d argue (professional hat) it’s the most important thing ML fosters: multi-threaded thinking.
It’s not you. It’s how a lot of people are taught to think, by accident and not. It’s nothing you’re doing. No one w/crit-thinking skills thinks you’re shitting on Viv. /🧵
It’s not you. It’s how a lot of people are taught to think, by accident and not. It’s nothing you’re doing. No one w/crit-thinking skills thinks you’re shitting on Viv. /🧵
December 15, 2025 at 6:46 PM
It’s a media literacy problem. I’d argue (professional hat) it’s the most important thing ML fosters: multi-threaded thinking.
It’s not you. It’s how a lot of people are taught to think, by accident and not. It’s nothing you’re doing. No one w/crit-thinking skills thinks you’re shitting on Viv. /🧵
It’s not you. It’s how a lot of people are taught to think, by accident and not. It’s nothing you’re doing. No one w/crit-thinking skills thinks you’re shitting on Viv. /🧵
the cultural standpoint of thinking that perfect lockstep and complete rejection are the only options, and it’s genuinely inconceivable to hold multiple supported interpretations of the same thing next to each other and STILL have others in your head to dream about. And you can like them ALL. 🧵2/3
December 15, 2025 at 6:46 PM
the cultural standpoint of thinking that perfect lockstep and complete rejection are the only options, and it’s genuinely inconceivable to hold multiple supported interpretations of the same thing next to each other and STILL have others in your head to dream about. And you can like them ALL. 🧵2/3
Honestly? They are saying that bc they don’t know that loving something (fan sense) means actually seeing it for what it is, and having real opinions with nuance. You can’t help those people when they don’t even understand their fundamental mistake. This fandom has a huge population with 🧵1/3
December 15, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Honestly? They are saying that bc they don’t know that loving something (fan sense) means actually seeing it for what it is, and having real opinions with nuance. You can’t help those people when they don’t even understand their fundamental mistake. This fandom has a huge population with 🧵1/3
I LOVE this. I can absolutely imagine them having moments like Vox and Vel do in the limo after fucking with Charlie for an episode, and it would look just like this!
December 15, 2025 at 2:26 PM
I LOVE this. I can absolutely imagine them having moments like Vox and Vel do in the limo after fucking with Charlie for an episode, and it would look just like this!
I think this fits what we’ve seen of him so far better than the idea he is sickened/horrified. He’s a self-repressing performative control freak who uses feelings (of all kinds) to manipulate others. Having them himself has to feel downright dangerous to him. His body “betraying” him would be worse.
December 15, 2025 at 2:17 PM
I think this fits what we’ve seen of him so far better than the idea he is sickened/horrified. He’s a self-repressing performative control freak who uses feelings (of all kinds) to manipulate others. Having them himself has to feel downright dangerous to him. His body “betraying” him would be worse.
Omfg yes please.
December 14, 2025 at 6:55 PM
Omfg yes please.
Not a rebuke of them, just - “Folks, there are MORE OPTIONS if you scroll.”
Audience AND writers AND characters get stuck on those two labels a little compulsively. What ppl call “crumbs” are ALSO just what a complex dynamic is like: romantic, sexual AND importantly, otherwise.
No hate @shipping.
Audience AND writers AND characters get stuck on those two labels a little compulsively. What ppl call “crumbs” are ALSO just what a complex dynamic is like: romantic, sexual AND importantly, otherwise.
No hate @shipping.
December 14, 2025 at 1:31 PM
Not a rebuke of them, just - “Folks, there are MORE OPTIONS if you scroll.”
Audience AND writers AND characters get stuck on those two labels a little compulsively. What ppl call “crumbs” are ALSO just what a complex dynamic is like: romantic, sexual AND importantly, otherwise.
No hate @shipping.
Audience AND writers AND characters get stuck on those two labels a little compulsively. What ppl call “crumbs” are ALSO just what a complex dynamic is like: romantic, sexual AND importantly, otherwise.
No hate @shipping.
It’s also in the same spot as Stayed Gone in s1 - a song where two people who miss each other default to hatred, as though again, those are the only two options for two people to be close.
Viv seems to like poking at tropes and Ch/Pen feels like a comment on ALL forced-feeling romances/ships. 🧵
Viv seems to like poking at tropes and Ch/Pen feels like a comment on ALL forced-feeling romances/ships. 🧵
December 14, 2025 at 1:31 PM
It’s also in the same spot as Stayed Gone in s1 - a song where two people who miss each other default to hatred, as though again, those are the only two options for two people to be close.
Viv seems to like poking at tropes and Ch/Pen feels like a comment on ALL forced-feeling romances/ships. 🧵
Viv seems to like poking at tropes and Ch/Pen feels like a comment on ALL forced-feeling romances/ships. 🧵
If it helps, the song does establish that they don’t know if they’re in love. It might even be a wink at how audiences make a love story out of any kind of dynamic - characters too - bc what else is there? I think it’s a comment on the cultural default to romance. 🧵
December 14, 2025 at 1:31 PM
If it helps, the song does establish that they don’t know if they’re in love. It might even be a wink at how audiences make a love story out of any kind of dynamic - characters too - bc what else is there? I think it’s a comment on the cultural default to romance. 🧵
Beside you there are four wolves.
Shit - ok - People!! Inner wolves are supposed to stay INSIDE.
Shit - ok - People!! Inner wolves are supposed to stay INSIDE.
December 14, 2025 at 12:47 PM
Beside you there are four wolves.
Shit - ok - People!! Inner wolves are supposed to stay INSIDE.
Shit - ok - People!! Inner wolves are supposed to stay INSIDE.
I’m literally crying thank you. This is the first one of these jokes about this line that really got me!
December 12, 2025 at 5:01 AM
I’m literally crying thank you. This is the first one of these jokes about this line that really got me!