We cool with it. I would not trust a qualitative researcher who claimed their research was unfalsifiable.

We tend to rely on transparency and triangulating multiple data sources, so that someone else can follow your protocols and trust your findings. But they will never be able to reproduce the exact same findings, because they are not you. Validity is not the same as being falsifiable.

Qualitative methods use interpretive methods, you and I will inevitably have different interpretations of the same qualitative data set. We do our best to be transparent about how we collect and analyze our data, as well as our limitations. We strive for validity and rigor, not universal truths.

First they came for my students, then they came for my knitting.

We have just as much right to ride the train as customers who can walk. When will this be fixed ?

So many amazing stories from Belgium about social security for food, public land, public fruit trees and edible parks, community kitchens, public procurement, CSA and public -commons partnerships led by the grassroots.

Vital questions being asked about how to include social and solidarity economy and food as commons in the CAP.

Give the award to your fired staff. What a brave publication this used to be.