Text SIGN PEGMGN to 50409 — The President of the United States is a danger to this country’s own people. This isn’t hyperbole—it’s the reality that we live in. We’ve slow-boiled ourselves into normalizing all of his absolutely insane behavior thanks to a complicit media and rampant social media manipulation. Congress and the courts are supposed to be our check on the president’s personal—and in many cases, illegal—agenda. Yet, the Republicans live in fear of what retribution might come their way if they resist the regime. We’ve all seen this movie before. We know what happens when a leader is given a blank check to do as they wish with a nation. This is how genocides happen. We’re watching this unfold in real time. The American people are pleading with you—PLEASE HELP US. We need the Republicans in Congress to stop enabling the lunatic in the Oval Office from destroying our country from within. CONGRESS CAN STOP THIS. Please honor your oath to the Constitution and resist this tyrannical takeover—whichever side of the aisle you might be on. We’re running out of time. Remember, Adolph Hitler was elected into office, too.

Text SIGN PNSWSH to 50409 — Extra extra! Fox News host aka US Sec of Defense and/or War sues American hero for telling the truth. Before becoming a Fox talking head Pete Hegseth served in the Army Reserve and the National Guard. He never rose to a command position and his “track record falls short of military standards.” He is the least-experienced defense secretary in US history. Mark Kelly’s record of service to country is beyond exemplary. Citations during his lifetime of service include the Navy Pilot Astronaut Badge, earned by fewer than 200 service members. The NASA Distinguished Service Medal, “the highest award bestowed by NASA and one of the rarest awards in the federal government.” Since the medal was created in 1959, it has been awarded fewer than 400 times. He retired from the Navy as a Captain, or an O-6. That's one grade below the admiral ranks. Fewer than 6% of US Navy officers reach this grade. He was awarded the Navy Pilot Astronaut Badge. The Astronaut Badge is the rarest skills badge in all of the US military. Fewer than 200 service members have earned it. Then there’s just some of his medals. The Defense Superior Service Medal, the second-highest non-combat-related decoration awarded by the DoD. He has two of them. The Legion of Merit. This is awarded to senior military leaders who have served exceptionally in positions of extraordinary responsibility. Given to senior officers whose careers have been marked by consistence excellence. The Distinguished Flying Cross, one of the military's highest awards for aerial service, given to those who “have distinguished themselves by single acts of heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight.” Most military pilots will never receive one. Senator Kelly earned two. The Air Medal, awarded for single acts of heroism or extraordinary achievement in flight. Senator Kelly earned four of them: two for individual actions, two as part of a strike/flight. That’s what the “V” device on his medal means: valor in combat. All of them were earned in the Gulf War during Operation Desert Storm. Senator Kelly flew 39 combat missions. He was also awarded the Navy Commendation Medal (w/ “V” for valor) for another combat mission during Desert Storm. Senator Kelly was such an incredible aviator that he was assigned as an instructor at the US Naval Test Pilot School in Maryland for two years, where he earned his second Navy Commendation Medal. In 1996 he was accepted into the NASA Astronaut Corps, where he spent the rest of his career as a shuttle pilot and commander. He earned four NASA Space Flight Medals for his four separate missions into space, and earned the more prestigious NASA Exceptional Service Medal for the consistency of his excellence while there. But the most impressive honor he earned is the NASA Distinguished Service Medal, the highest award bestowed by NASA and one of the rarest awards in the federal government. Fewer than 400 have been earned since its inception in 1959. So this is the guy that the national embarrassment that is Pete Hegseth has the audacity to call seditious and traitorous. Has the nerve to try and have demoted, humiliated, for telling troops they don’t have to obey illegal orders. That it is their duty under our Constitution to refuse to do so. All this as we read that when the US military attacked a small boat apparently coming from Venezuela on September 2, 2025, the first such attack of what now number at least 35, it used a secret aircraft that had been disguised to look like a civilian plane. This is a war crime. Instead of trying to besmirch a true American hero, Pete Hegseth should do the honorable thing and resign. Or better yet be sent to The Hague. He is a stain on our military and an abomination to our country. When you voted to confirm him why did you expect anything better?

Text SIGN PEQYFO to 50409 — I urge Congress to investigate the Trump administration’s use of a U.S. military aircraft disguised as a civilian plane in a strike on a Venezuelan vessel. Concealing weapons and pretending to be a civilian violates the law of war and constitutes perfidy, a war crime. If any country like Canada, Mexico, Greenland, or Cuba had shot down an American passenger plane, those responsible would face murder charges. The same accountability must apply here. I request Congress hold all involved officials responsible for this unlawful action and clarify steps for oversight and justice.

Text SIGN PSNTFD to 50409 — I am writing to urge you to oppose the Trump administration's economic policies, which have demonstrably failed to deliver on their promises and are harming working families in our community. The December 2025 jobs report revealed only 50,000 jobs added, bringing the year's total to just 584,000 jobs. This falls far short of the approximately 150,000 jobs per month needed to keep pace with population growth. For comparison, over 2 million jobs were created in 2024, and the previous administration's four-year total exceeded 16 million jobs. This represents the worst first-year job growth in over two decades, excluding only the Great Recession and COVID-19 pandemic periods. Manufacturing has been particularly devastated, with eight consecutive months of job losses since the April tariff announcement. Part-time workers seeking full-time employment and long-term unemployed workers are at decade-high levels. The administration's federal workforce purge eliminated 335,000 jobs, further suppressing economic growth. Trump's tariff policy has been especially harmful. With an effective tariff rate around 17 percent, the highest in 90 years, American companies and consumers have borne 94 percent of the cost. The Tax Foundation estimated these tariffs cost each American household $1,100 in 2025, with companies facing approximately $1.2 trillion in tariff costs that were largely passed on to consumers. Retaliatory tariffs from other countries, particularly China, have closed foreign markets to American farmers, requiring another taxpayer-funded bailout. Consumer confidence reflects this reality, with only 21 percent of Americans rating the economy as good or excellent in Gallup's year-end polling. The share of GDP going to workers in wages and salaries has fallen to its lowest point since data collection began in 1947. Healthcare premiums are skyrocketing for millions due to the failure to extend Affordable Care Act subsidies. I urge you to oppose further tariff expansion, support legislation to restore job growth, and prioritize policies that put money back in the pockets of working families rather than protecting failed economic experiments.

See the campaigns @SZAEPHOD is organizing. Text FOLLOW SZAEPHOD to subscribe!

Text SIGN PKGSDT to 50409 — We haven't forgotten about the Epstein files, despite all that this administration is doing to try to get us to turn our attention elsewhere. We haven't forgotten and won't forget. We are watching what you are doing, and what you're not doing. You must stand on the side of what's right. Push for the FULL release of the files and let those who are responsible be held accountable. Finally.

Text SIGN PNPXRS to 50409 — I don't believe I have to say this to you. But I do. DO NOT vote yes on any bill that would annex Greenland. Or invade Greenland. Or do anything to Greenland other than treat it with respect. Stop appeasing our wanna-be dictator.

Text SIGN PMCVII to 50409 — I am writing to urge you to ensure that the House Oversight Committee's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein applies equal standards to all individuals named in the released files, regardless of political affiliation. While I understand the committee is pursuing contempt proceedings against Bill and Hillary Clinton for failing to appear for depositions scheduled this week, this same level of scrutiny must extend to all powerful figures connected to Epstein, including Republicans such as Donald Trump. The Justice Department released the first tranche of Epstein-related files in December, which included multiple photos of Bill Clinton. However, any comprehensive investigation must examine all individuals who appear in these documents or had documented associations with Epstein. Selective enforcement based on party affiliation undermines the legitimacy of congressional oversight and erodes public trust in our institutions. Recent history demonstrates inconsistent application of contempt standards. Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro were sentenced to prison for defying subpoenas from the January 6 committee, while former Attorney General Merrick Garland faced no prosecution after being held in contempt in 2024 for refusing to turn over audio of President Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur. This pattern of partisan enforcement must end. If Chairman Comer and the Oversight Committee are serious about uncovering the truth regarding Epstein's network of powerful associates, they must issue subpoenas to all individuals named in the files and pursue contempt proceedings equally against anyone who refuses to comply. The American people deserve answers about how a convicted sex offender maintained access to the highest levels of power across both parties. I urge you to publicly call for equal treatment of all witnesses in this investigation and to support subpoenas for every individual with documented Epstein connections, regardless of their political party. Justice cannot be selective.

Text SIGN PPOEFM to 50409 — I am writing to urge you in the strongest possible terms to oppose the so-called “Greenland Annexation and Statehood Act.” This proposal is reckless, unserious, and a transparent exercise in distraction politics at a moment when our country is facing genuine and urgent crises at home. The United States does not need to annex Greenland. We need Congress to focus on its actual responsibilities to the people it serves. Right now, federal agents are being deployed aggressively within our own borders, with credible reports of unlawful detentions and violations of civil liberties. Our democratic institutions are under strain, not from foreign territory we do not own, but from actions being taken here on U.S. soil. We are still awaiting the full release of the Epstein files. Child care funding remains frozen. Families are struggling with high prices. Homelessness is at an all-time high. These are not abstract problems — they are affecting real people every day. Annexing another country’s territory will not lower costs, house families, protect civil rights, or strengthen democracy. It will, however, divert time, attention, and political capital away from the work Congress should be doing right now. I expect you to reject this bill and any effort to legitimize it. Please use your office to defend constitutional norms, address the real crises facing Americans, and refuse to participate in performative legislation that serves no public good.

Text SIGN PUSFLF to 50409 — I am writing to urge you to oppose the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which threatens to erase queer and trans communities from the internet. While this bill is marketed as protecting children online, I am deeply concerned that it will be weaponized to censor LGBTQ+ content and resources that are lifelines for vulnerable youth. KOSA establishes a duty of care that would empower the Federal Trade Commission to censor content deemed capable of making children anxious or depressed. Under the current Trump administration, this means health resources for LGBTQ+ youth and abortion information would be targeted. The Trump-controlled FTC has already held workshops on targeting trans healthcare providers, and Project 2025 explicitly outlines plans to label queer and trans content as pornographic. This is not speculation. Republican supporters like Senator Marsha Blackburn and the Heritage Foundation have publicly stated their intention to use KOSA to remove trans content and abortion resources from the internet. Twenty-five states have already passed age verification laws requiring invasive ID checks before accessing content deemed harmful to minors, demonstrating how these mechanisms are deployed against marginalized communities. KOSA raises the same censorship concerns as SESTA/FOSTA but on a far larger scale. LGBTQ+ and human rights organizations have repeatedly warned about these dangers. In September 2025, when Fight For The Future and local LGBTQ+ organizations delivered petitions requesting meetings with lawmakers, many were declined, shutting out constituent voices on this critical issue. Progressive leaders like Senator Edward Markey, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Representative Maxwell Frost oppose KOSA. There are better alternatives to address Big Tech harms, including privacy legislation, antitrust enforcement, and algorithmic justice reforms that do not sacrifice LGBTQ+ youth. I respectfully request that you oppose KOSA in any form and support alternative approaches that protect young people without enabling censorship of marginalized communities.

Text SIGN PGZOYE to 50409 — I am writing to question the fundamental purpose of our state government when it fails to fulfill its most basic obligation: protecting residents from unchecked force and violence, regardless of the source. Government exists for one essential reason, as John Locke articulated centuries ago: to protect life and liberty. Before constitutions and modern nation-states, societies learned that unchecked force becomes predatory. We created government as a social compact where people agree to be governed in exchange for protection from armed power. Violence must be restrained, force must be accountable, and power must answer to law. That promise is being broken. Federal paramilitary forces are operating in our communities, conducting raids, detaining people without transparency, and acting like an occupying force rather than public servants bound by law. This is not law and order. This is precisely what government was designed to prevent. State governments are not subsidiaries of federal power. They exist specifically to intercede when centralized authority turns predatory. When federal power becomes unaccountable and destructive of the very ends it was meant to serve, it forfeits legitimacy. At that point, state and local governments have a constitutional duty to block, resist, and refuse cooperation with forces that brutalize residents. I am asking what purpose our state government serves if it stands aside while federal forces terrorize the people it claims to represent. Why should I continue paying into a system that fails to keep me safe? A government that will not shield its people from terror has no reason to exist. This is not a radical position. It is foundational to American governance. Government was created so no one could rule by fear. I expect you to hold our state government accountable to that principle and take concrete action to protect residents from federal overreach. Our communities deserve protection from all forms of unchecked violence, whether it comes from criminals or from those who claim to act in the name of law.

Text SIGN PDWAUN to 50409 — I am writing to urge the Supreme Court to uphold Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in Louisiana v. Callais and protect mail-in ballot access in Watson v. RNC. These cases will determine whether millions of Americans can exercise their fundamental right to vote, and decisions are expected by June. Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 remains the last real brake on unbridled gerrymandering, as George Washington University law professor Spencer Overton has noted. If the Court curtails Section 2, Republican states in the South could have virtual free rein to redraw congressional and legislative lines in ways that discriminate against minority voters. The ACLU and voting rights activists warn this could open floodgates for discriminatory maps. Harvard Law School professor Nicholas Stephanopoulos expects Alabama, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Mississippi would all redistrict after a Callais decision if possible for 2026. The case has already triggered a national redistricting scramble, with Texas Republicans redrawing maps and Florida announcing intentions to follow suit. The Court came close to gutting Section 2 in 2023 but decided 5-4 to keep it in place, recognizing its essential role in preventing racial discrimination in voting procedures. In Watson v. RNC, the question is whether states can count mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day if postmarked by that date. More than a dozen states and territories have grace periods like Mississippi's five-day window. The DNC correctly argues that ruling for the RNC would disenfranchise voters across the country due to mail delays beyond their control. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine already eliminated his state's grace period last month, citing concerns about this pending case. I urge the Court to protect voting rights by upholding Section 2 and allowing states to count legitimately cast ballots that arrive shortly after Election Day. These protections ensure every eligible American can participate in our democracy.

Text SIGN POWKYN to 50409 — Greenland should not be the 51st state of America. This would greenlight annexation. We cannot support the regime. In any sense. I would rather you suppo rt section 2, article 4 of the constitution. It's the only way.

Text SIGN PGENHN to 50409 — Donald Trump is threatening our global standing as a country by his constant, idiotic threats against other countries. If he continues to threaten Greenland, our global position will dissolve- NATO will end, Europe will call in our debts, and any Americans in Europe will lose protections and be treated as enemy civilians. Tourism to the US will collapse even more than it has already. Congress must get control of him- words have consequences, and the President of the United States has NO right to ruin us this way. Pete Hegseth is laughably, dangerously wrong when he says no one would dare attack us- we may have the biggest military in the world, but NATO doesn't need weapons to completely and utterly destroy us: all they have to do is dump $38 trillion of US bonds and we'll be in a cataclysmic depression and completely without friends or allies. Shut him up or impeach him, it's up to you, but the time has come to take action to calm this situation down before it escalates in ways that won't be repairable in the next administration.

Text SIGN PZWOBI to 50409 — As your constituent, I urge you to reject AB672, a bill that would dangerously curtail freedom of speech and increase options for government surveillance of individuals in Wisconsin. The broad, vague language of this supposedly anti-terrorist legislation can be used to suppress free speech and justify ever-greater surveillance of everyone in Wisconsin. This is unacceptable, and it must be stopped. Thank you.

Text SIGN PDGTBR to 50409 — You are constitutionally obligated to conduct oversight of the Executive Branch—especially when credible allegations involve violations of U.S. and international law. Serious accusations have been raised regarding Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, including allegations of war crimes and acts that may constitute perfidy under the laws of armed conflict, reportedly connected to U.S. operations in the Caribbean. Perfidy is not a technicality. It is a grave war crime under the Geneva Conventions and U.S. military law. It involves deception that abuses protected status—such as civilian or humanitarian cover—to carry out hostilities. If such acts occurred under the influence, direction, authorization, or advocacy of the sitting Secretary of Defense, this represents an extraordinary breach of law, ethics, and trust. If they did not occur, then a transparent, public investigation is the only legitimate way to establish that fact. Congress cannot claim ignorance. Congress cannot hide behind partisanship. And Congress cannot outsource its constitutional duty because the accused holds power. The United States loses all moral authority when it condemns war crimes abroad while refusing to investigate credible allegations involving its own Secretary of Defense. Your inaction sends a dangerous message: that senior officials are immune from scrutiny, that the laws of war are optional for Americans, and that civilian lives are expendable when political loyalty is at stake. That message endangers U.S. service members, erodes military discipline, and places this country on the wrong side of history. You must immediately: • Open a formal Congressional investigation into allegations involving Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth • Subpoena testimony under oath and preserve all relevant communications, directives, and records • Refer any substantiated findings to appropriate civilian and military judicial authorities • Publicly reaffirm that no Cabinet official is above the law—ever Failure to act will be understood clearly by the American people as deliberate complicity. Oversight abandoned in moments of political discomfort is not oversight at all—it is surrender of the rule of law. Congress exists to restrain abuse of power. If you will not act when allegations of war crimes reach the Secretary of Defense himself, then you have abandoned the very purpose of your office. Do your job. Investigate fully. Follow the evidence. And make the findings public.

Text SIGN PJWXBG to 50409 — I am writing to urge you to join Senator Tom Tillis in speaking out and acting to defend the Federal Reserve’s independence and Chair Jerome Powell from political threats or intimidation. Specifically, join Senator Tillis in refusing to vote for Trump nominations to the Federal Reserve, until the politically motivated investigation of Powell is resolved.  An independent central bank is essential to financial stability, low inflation, credibility, and the rule of law.  Additionally, it is critical to block the Administration’s authoritarian actions. Your voice carries weight. Please stand with Senator Tillis and make clear that no administration—of any party—should pressure or punish the Fed for doing its job.

Text SIGN PLMEVS to 50409 — I write to express urgent and well-documented concerns about actions and rhetoric coming from the federal government that pose a threat to the integrity, fairness, and public confidence in the upcoming 2026 U.S. midterm elections. 1. Threats to Electoral Integrity Earlier this month, President Donald Trump publicly floated the idea of canceling the 2026 elections, before insisting the comments were rhetorical. Experts note that federal law does not permit a president to cancel or postpone these elections, which are set for November 3, 2026 and are administered by the states under the Constitution and federal statutes.  Comments suggesting that lawful elections might be canceled — even hypothetically — undermine core democratic norms and erode confidence in the electoral process. 2. Federal Lawsuits Seeking Sensitive Voter Data The U.S. Department of Justice has filed dozens of lawsuits against states that refused to turn over detailed voter registration data, including names, addresses, birth dates, driver’s license numbers, and partial Social Security numbers. This campaign now includes at least 23 states and Washington, D.C. and has expanded rapidly in recent months.  State election officials and civil rights groups have raised genuine privacy concerns about sharing such information and the possibility that sensitive data could be misused.  3. Ongoing Concerns About Federal Interference Across recent reporting, election officials and democracy advocates have warned about efforts from the federal executive branch to influence election practices and the administration’s broader approach to election administration.  While federal authority over state election law is limited, aggressive pursuit of voter data and public rhetoric attacking election legitimacy increase the risk of confusion, litigation, and loss of voter confidence. Requests for Congressional Action I urge you to support appropriate actions by Congress to: • Affirm unequivocally that the federal government has no authority to cancel or postpone state-run elections or to interfere directly in how elections are conducted. • Ensure federal election law protects the privacy and integrity of voter registration information and prohibits its use for purposes unrelated to legitimate law enforcement or election administration. • Conduct robust oversight of executive branch activities related to elections, including any data requests or litigation strategies that could affect access to the ballot or public confidence in the election outcomes. These steps are necessary to preserve public trust and the constitutional principle that the people — not the federal executive — determine the outcome of our elections. Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

Text SIGN PTAIFF to 50409 — The Supreme Court is currently hearing cases from Idaho and West Virginia that challenge state bans on transgender athletes participating in sports consistent with their gender identity. While lower courts initially ruled in favor of trans athletes in both cases, the states have appealed, creating uncertainty about federal protections. I am writing to urge you to proactively enact state-level protections that guarantee transgender youth the right to participate in school sports. The West Virginia case illustrates the discriminatory nature of these bans. When H.B. 3293 was enacted in 2021, the state claimed it was necessary to save women's sports from an influx of male athletes threatening championships. The reality was starkly different: the law banned exactly one sixth-grade transgender girl, Becky Pepper-Jackson, from participating on her school's cross-country and track-and-field teams with her friends. This was not about protecting competitive fairness but about targeting a single individual. The Idaho case reveals even more troubling implications. H.B. 500 includes sex-verification requirements that can be triggered when any person, including opposing teams or bystanders, disputes a girl's sex. The law requires disputes to be resolved by examining a student's reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or testosterone levels. This means all female athletes, whether transgender or cisgender, could be subjected to invasive tests including pelvic examinations that extend far beyond routine sports physicals. We cannot rely on the current Supreme Court to protect vulnerable youth from discriminatory legislation. I urge you to introduce and support legislation that explicitly protects the rights of transgender students to participate in school activities consistent with their gender identity. These protections should include clear privacy safeguards that prevent invasive verification procedures for any student athlete. Our state has the opportunity to lead by ensuring all young people can participate in sports with dignity and respect.

Text SIGN PTDNVF to 50409 — On January 8, 2026, Secretary Kristi Noem stood at a DHS podium displaying the phrase “One of ours, all of yours.” This is the language of collective punishment, the doctrine that powered Nazi terror. Any official who uses or tolerates such rhetoric is unfit for office. Congress must condemn it publicly and hold accountable the Trump administration and Republican allies who normalize authoritarian language and behavior.

Text SIGN PBMAWX to 50409 — I am writing as a concerned American who is watching in horror as the US military commits war crimes as part of its illegal and unnecessary hostilities in Venezuela. As reported widely on 12 January, it appears that a military aircraft was painted as though it were a civilian in order to disguise its true intent. The onboard munitions were also carried internally rather than under its wings, further obscuring its purpose. Real service people know the difference and are aware of the rules of engagement. When we have a Fox News host cosplaying as the secretary of defense, we get these uneducated and unethical decisions. We need a real leader in the pentagon not someone playing dress up. Demand hearings on the possible perfidy and impeach Hegseth for war crimes.

Text SIGN PJSLRB to 50409 — Please VOTE YES and the SUPPORT THE PEOPLE ACT or explain why you would vote NO.

Text SIGN PHNNKH to 50409 — I am writing to urge you, as a Member of Congress, to use every constitutional tool at your disposal to rein in an increasingly authoritarian Trump regime before its escalating abuses cause irreparable harm to our democracy, the rule of law, and global stability. We are living through a deliberate split-screen strategy. On the domestic front, the Trump regime is on a historic losing streak—losing in the courts, in Congress, at the ballot box, and in the streets. Public sentiment has turned decisively against ICE abuses and in favor of immigrants, civil liberties, and peaceful protest. The killing of Renee Nicole Good has become a moral and political turning point, galvanizing opposition nationwide. Rather than respond with accountability, the regime has doubled down—slandering the victim, refusing to investigate the ICE officer who killed her, escalating raids, and tolerating tactics that violate the most basic protections of the Fourth Amendment. The Department of Justice’s reported refusal to investigate the killing has already led to resignations by senior DOJ attorneys, deepening a crisis of credibility inside an institution that should be defending the rule of law, not subverting it. At the same time, the Trump regime is attempting to divert attention abroad—threatening or attacking Venezuela, Cuba, Mexico, Iran, Greenland, and even NATO allies. This belligerence is not strength; it is distraction. As domestic authority erodes, the regime is leaning into the one arena where U.S. power is overwhelming: military force. This recklessness risks unauthorized wars, humanitarian catastrophe, and the collapse of long-standing alliances—none of it approved by Congress, none of it constitutional. The pattern is unmistakable: as losses mount at home, aggression abroad increases. Domestically, the regime continues to weaponize federal power. Its criminal investigation of Jerome Powell is a clear act of retaliation for refusing to subordinate monetary policy to presidential demands. The Federal Reserve’s independence exists precisely to prevent political manipulation of the economy. Undermining it has already rattled markets and threatens the financial security of millions of Americans. Courts are pushing back. States and cities are pushing back. Even members of the president’s own party are pushing back—through discharge petitions, public statements, and resistance to further consolidation of power. The Trump regime has failed to fully capture the courts, the states, Congress, or the information ecosystem. That window of resistance still exists—but it is closing. Congress was designed for moments like this. You possess constitutional tools created for exactly this scenario: oversight hearings, subpoenas, inherent contempt, appropriations authority, enforcement of statutory mandates—including the Epstein Files Transparency Act—and, where warranted, impeachment. These are not radical measures. They are the ordinary defenses of a republic under extraordinary assault. Millions of Americans are doing their part through peaceful, visible protest. Now Congress must do yours. History will not ask whether action was convenient. It will ask whether Congress upheld the Constitution when an authoritarian regime tested its limits—and went too far.

Text SIGN PYTPMP to 50409 — I am writing to state plainly what should already be obvious: Congress has failed in its constitutional duty by allowing credible allegations of U.S. war crimes to go unanswered and uninvestigated. A U.S. military operation authorized under the Trump administration involved the deliberate use of a military aircraft configured to masquerade as a civilian plane in order to carry out a lethal attack at sea. Weapons were concealed, and the aircraft was intentionally presented as non-military. This conduct meets the definition of perfidy, a war crime prohibited under international humanitarian law and criminalized under U.S. law. This was not an accident. It was not a misunderstanding. It was a calculated deception that relied on civilian protections to facilitate lethal force. When a military disguises itself as civilian in order to kill, it destroys the legal distinction between combatants and civilians and places innocent lives at risk everywhere. That is precisely why perfidy is forbidden without exception. What is just as disturbing as the conduct itself is Congress’s response: silence. Rather than exercising oversight, demanding legal justification, or asserting its constitutional authority, Congress has largely abdicated its responsibility. That abdication is not passive; it is an active failure to uphold the Constitution, the rule of law, and the obligations of the United States under the Geneva Conventions and the War Crimes Act. Compounding this failure is the administration’s assertion that the United States is engaged in an armed conflict with drug cartels—a claim that stretches the law beyond recognition and appears designed to manufacture wartime authority where none lawfully exists. Congress has allowed this dangerous theory to stand unchallenged, enabling the executive branch to expand lethal force without accountability. You swore an oath to the Constitution, not to any president, party, or administration. That oath requires you to act when the executive branch plausibly commits or authorizes war crimes. By failing to investigate, legislate, or even publicly object, Congress is not merely neglecting its duty—it is violating it. I therefore accuse Congress, including yourself, of dereliction of duty. That dereliction has real consequences: it normalizes unlawful violence, erodes international law, and signals to the world that the United States believes itself above the rules it enforces on others. I expect immediate and concrete action, including: A formal congressional investigation into the authorization and legality of these operations Disclosure of all legal opinions and rules of engagement used to justify them Legislative action explicitly prohibiting perfidy and repudiating any doctrine that enables it Accountability for civilian and military officials who authorized or carried out unlawful conduct Anything less will confirm that Congress has chosen convenience over law and political safety over constitutional responsibility. History will record whether Congress acted when confronted with credible evidence of war crimes—or whether it chose to look away. I expect a direct response explaining what you will do to correct this failure.

Text SIGN PMQRIC to 50409 — I am writing to urge you to oppose the Moccasin Granite Project proposed by the Hungry Horse Ranger District on the Flathead National Forest. This controversial logging initiative would affect 67,536 acres along the Wild and Scenic Middle Fork of the Flathead River near Glacier National Park, including roadless lands recommended for addition to the Great Bear Wilderness and core grizzly bear habitat. The project includes construction of 7.6 miles of new "temporary" roads, which will increase grizzly bear mortality. Roads are a major source of death for these endangered animals. Additionally, humans are responsible for 84% of all wildfires, and most wildfires occur within a few hundred feet of roads. Building new roads directly contradicts the stated goal of reducing wildfire threat. The Forest Service's justification for this project is based on flawed science. The dominant tree species in the area have long fire rotations of many decades to hundreds of years between significant blazes. The agency acknowledges that nearly 70% of the project area falls within a stand-replacing fire regime, meaning large fires are infrequent but intense when they occur under extreme climatic conditions. Research by the Forest Service's own scientists has concluded that fuel removal more than 100 feet from structures provides no additional benefit. One review study of 1,500 wildfires found that fire severity was actually higher in areas with active forest management compared to wilderness and roadless areas. Thinning can exacerbate fire spread by opening the canopy, promoting soil and fuel drying, and making it easier for wind to penetrate and carry embers. The Forest Service is using emergency authorities under section 40807 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to avoid public scrutiny. This project will result in loss of secure grizzly bear habitat, increased stream sedimentation, loss of carbon storage, loss of scenic value, and significant taxpayer costs. I urge you to oppose this project and support protecting the Great Bear Wilderness and adjacent roadless areas from logging and new road construction.