Yep, low CFs mean you need storage and flexibility. But reliability doesn’t have to equal new coal – Rajasthan can lean on a portfolio of solar, wind, storage, demand response and grid links instead.

Fair on the capacity‑factor math – 4.4 GW coal isn’t 4.4 GW solar. But planners don’t have to choose between ‘baseload coal’ and ‘solar + huge batteries’: Rajasthan can use a portfolio of solar, wind, storage, demand response and grid links to get reliability without locking in new coal.

Brilliant summary of where EU hydrogen is headed and what it means for CBAM and heavy industry – really helpful context, thanks for sharing this

A score is only as good as the data behind it. We’ve built a "receipt" for our scoring engine so you can see exactly how we evaluate the companies shaping our future.

Read the full breakdown here: 🔗 originchains.com/methodology

5️⃣ Supply Chain: The hidden trail. For many, 90% of emissions are Scope 3. We measure who is taking responsibility and who is hiding their history.

3️⃣ Footprint: Global efficiency. We use Location-Based data to reflect physical reality, not accounting tricks. 4️⃣ Performance: Peer comparison. Are they the best in their sector, or just "green" by association?

1️⃣ Ambition: Is the company promising enough? We score based on 1.5°C alignment, not just "aspirational" goals. 2️⃣ Action: Habit over hype. We reward the long-term track record of consistent, honest data disclosure.

newclimate.org/resources/pu...