Resorting to name-calling isn’t an argument—it’s an admission you don’t have one. My words stand on their own, backed by logic, reason, and conviction. If you had a case to make, you’d make it. Instead, you’re just proving my point, attacking the speaker because you can't refute the argument.

The federal government exists to protect rights, secure borders, and uphold the Constitution—not to fund endless bureaucracies. Every dollar wasted on redundant agencies is a dollar stolen from taxpayers. Cutting Washington’s bloat isn’t cruelty—it’s responsibility. And it's about time.

Courage isn’t measured in profile pictures—it’s measured in standing by your words. My name is here, my views are clear, and I don’t need a selfie to prove conviction. If that’s all you’ve got, you never had an argument. PS: this app literally lets you pick this image for a profile picture.

The party that spent years packing courts, ignoring the First Amendment, erasing borders, and weaponizing the justice system wants to lecture about "dismantling governance"? The Constitution isn’t being dismantled—it’s being restored, piece by piece, despite your protests.

Marc Cuban is the Leftist billionaire I spoke of. It's his original post.

Success isn’t measured by never failing—it’s measured by building again, stronger. Meanwhile, D.C. bureaucrats never fail, for they risk nothing, create nothing, and live off taxpayers then retire as millionaires somehow. That’s the real scam. And let's not debase ourselves with election denial.

True—just like nobody owes them unchallenged narratives. If they’d rather block and run than defend their views, that’s their choice. But let’s not pretend it’s anything but an admission that they can’t.

Nothing says "bravery," like blocking someone mid-sentence and declaring victory. And nothing says "deep thinking" like reducing debate to profile pictures. The Dems used to argue their case—now they must curate the safe spaces for the Left. Quite the evolution.

The predictable exit—declare victory, avoid engagement, and run. You claim I have no ideas, yet you refuse to engage with them. That’s not an argument, Garry. That’s an excuse. But hey, if ignoring opposing views makes you feel smarter, I won’t stand in your way.

Attacking Republican millionaires while defending a leftist BILLIONAIRE buying influence. Seems legit. The real grift? D.C. bureaucrats getting rich selling out America. President Trump made his money before politics—you defend bureaucrats who get rich selling the people out to the highest bidders.

Ah yes, the last refuge of a man who’s lost the argument—hiding behind an emoji because words would betray him. You came looking for a fight, Garry, but all you brought was a child's digital sticker. Next time, try engaging with ideas instead of being afraid of them.

Ah, Garry—so eager to sound clever, yet so tragically unarmed for the task. You mistake rhetorical precision for trolling because you’re not used to conservatives playing offense. If you struggle with sarcasm, just say so. I’ll be sure to use smaller words next time.

@stephenking.bsky.social A horror writer should appreciate a good twist ending: the people who drove America mad now think they’re the sane ones.

You got one thing right, Mr. King—the lunatics have been running the asylum. They were the ones locking kids out of schools, inflating your grocery bill, and calling criminals ‘victims.’ The problem isn’t that your friends lost power. It’s that they ever had it.