Paul Stewens
@p-stewens.bsky.social
250 followers 380 following 50 posts
Law & Palaeontology researcher | PhD candidate (Maastricht University) | Master in Int‘l Law (Geneva Graduate Institute) | social dancer
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
p-stewens.bsky.social
There will be much more to say, esp. against the background of my research on the legal classification of hominin fossils. Watch this space for a blog post, and in the meantime, consider joining my upcoming lectures about human remains! /end

paul-stewens.com/news/
p-stewens.bsky.social
Java Man will now return as a fossil/cultural object, without any differential treatment on account of being a human ancestor. The fossils are not treated as human remains. This might be interesting for Zambia's struggle to return the Broken Hill skull from UK which they do claim as an ancestor. /6
p-stewens.bsky.social
The NL gov't also recognises that the fossils "held spiritual and economic value for local people". This puts the Dubois collection in the context of the debate surrounding the debate on colonial loot. Cultural & natural artifacts are two sides of the same coin. /5

www.government.nl/latest/news/...
The Netherlands will return Dubois collection to Indonesia
The Netherlands plans to transfer more than 28,000 fossils from the Dubois collection to Indonesia, following a request by Indonesian authorities. Today, Gouke Moes, Minister of Education, Culture and...
www.government.nl
p-stewens.bsky.social
I'm not aware of any other case where such a significant amount of fossils has been returned. This is an unprecedented, groundbreaking decision - and not only by the standards of natural history; I am not aware of any large-scale restitutions such as this one for art/antiquities, either. /4
p-stewens.bsky.social
The heart of the collection are the skullcap, femur and molar of a Homo erectus ("Java Man") which local workers, directed by Dutch anatomist Eugène #Dubois discovered in the 1890s. I've seen the exhibit @naturalis.bsky.social and it brilliantly integrates the fossils with a live reconstruction. /3
Glass cases with a live reconstruction of homo erectus on the Java Man fossils side by side.
p-stewens.bsky.social
This is HUGE. Unconditional #repatriation of 28,000 fossils from the Dubois collection to Indonesia. Largest ever fossil and perhaps natural history #restitution (AFAIK). Famous #hominin fossil included. Lots of things to unpack, here are some preliminary thoughts. /1
naturalis.bsky.social
Nederland geeft fossielen Dubois-collectie terug aan Indonesië.

Statement en meer informatie te vinden op www.naturalis.nl/persberichte...
Scheldepkapje in Dubois-collectie in zaal vroege mens
p-stewens.bsky.social
I'm going back to #Geneva! As the 2024 Lalive Merryman Fellow, I'll be working on the legal classification of #hominin fossils as #humanremains between 22/09 and 17/10. If you're in GVA during that time and/or curious about my research project, please (re-)connect!

paul-stewens.com/news/fellows...
Selfie of Paul Stewens in a green suit in front of the UN HQ in Geneva (Switzerland)
p-stewens.bsky.social
Update: The post is online!

bsky.app/profile/p-st...
p-stewens.bsky.social
Many people have sent me the CNN piece on trade in 🇲🇦 fossils. It does many things well; picking interviewees is not one of them. No legal experts, only palaeontologists repeating legal factoids. Please read my comment.

🌐CNN: edition.cnn.com/2025/08/15/s...
✒️Blog: paul-stewens.com/blog/2025/mo...
Paul P. Stewens | The 1970 UNESCO Convention applies to individual fossils
There is no legal grey area, and they don't have to belong to a collection.
paul-stewens.com
p-stewens.bsky.social
Many people have sent me the CNN piece on trade in 🇲🇦 fossils. It does many things well; picking interviewees is not one of them. No legal experts, only palaeontologists repeating legal factoids. Please read my comment.

🌐CNN: edition.cnn.com/2025/08/15/s...
✒️Blog: paul-stewens.com/blog/2025/mo...
Paul P. Stewens | The 1970 UNESCO Convention applies to individual fossils
There is no legal grey area, and they don't have to belong to a collection.
paul-stewens.com
p-stewens.bsky.social
In terms of substance, I take particular issue with the "legal gray area" argument and the allegedly imprecise wording of the 1970 UNESCO Convention. Expect a blog post. [fin]
p-stewens.bsky.social
Wholeheartedly agree with Emma. The piece is a really mixed bag: very comprehensive, topical, and timely, but with a selection of experts that I find partially questionable. Call me crazy, but I do think that a piece about the legality of the fossil trade should include legal experts. [cont'd]
emmadnn.bsky.social
Great to see an interrogation of the sources of commercial fossils, especially from Morocco 🦖🇲🇦

But utterly disappointing to see the platforming of people who have repeatedly and openly flouted (inter)national laws. Not a legal (or ethics) expert in sight 🤦‍♀️ [1]

edition.cnn.com/2025/08/15/s...
I tried to find out if the fossil I bought online was real. Then I realized I was asking the wrong question | CNN
It’s obvious a 95 million-year-old fossil would have a rich past — but what a CNN writer discovered about a dinosaur tooth he bought for about $100 was more than he anticipated.
edition.cnn.com
p-stewens.bsky.social
@alinemghilardi.bsky.social is leading another effort to bring the Irritator challengeri holotype back to Brazil. In support of #IrritatorBelongstoBR, I've written up a bit of background on the case, as well as some of my own thoughts. Make sure to check it out!

paul-stewens.com/blog/2025/ir...
Paul P. Stewens | Fossil repatriation is back on the agenda (#IrritatorBelongstoBR)
There's a new social media campaign for the return of <i>Irritator challengeri</i> - and it's high time German institutions listened.
paul-stewens.com
p-stewens.bsky.social
This is a beautiful, concise review of absolutely trailblazing research by the people who got me seriously interested in Law and Palaeontology back in 2021. You’ve done so much, against all odds, for the discipline and for me, and I deeply respect you for it!
p-stewens.bsky.social
Not sure honestly, I don't think these authorities are super active on any social media platform...
p-stewens.bsky.social
True, but a return based on a museum-level agreement would be seen as illegal. As part of a public collection, the fossil (ironically) is 🇩🇪 national cultural property that can only be exported with a license (Sections 6+23 Cultural Property Protection Act).
www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_kgs...
www.gesetze-im-internet.de
p-stewens.bsky.social
Being the author of said legal analysis, I can confirm that in my opinion, the @smnstuttgart.bsky.social did not acquire good title to the fossil and that it remains the property of Brazil.
p-stewens.bsky.social
@alinemghilardi.bsky.social: Maybe it could make sense to clarify this for the campaign? I think the pressure should be put on those institutions that actually call the shots, and these are the state government (@regierungbw.bsky.social) and, even more so, the science ministry (@mwk-bw.bsky.social).
p-stewens.bsky.social
Crucial point by @skyemcdavid.com: the social media campaign for #IrritatorBelongstoBR should target the gov't of Baden-Württemberg, not the @smnstuttgart.bsky.social (or the 🇩🇪 federal gov't). Remember: for #UbirajaraBelongstoBR, the gov't even overruled the museum, which had refused the return.
skyemcdavid.com
I agree Irritator should be repatriated, but the social media campaign should really be focusing on the State government of Baden-Württemberg rather than the museum, since the museum can't legally take action on its own.
p-stewens.bsky.social
Essential thread by @alinemghilardi.bsky.social about #IrritatorBelongstoBR. There was so much support for repatriation when we pushed for it in 2023 - and it’s high time that this is put back on the agenda; the fossil HAS to go back.

Detailed legal background: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
p-stewens.bsky.social
Remember the potentially forged #mosasaur jaw? I've turned my thread into a blog post, so if you're interested in the extended version, the director's cut, then here's the link: paul-stewens.com/blog/2025/xe...
p-stewens.bsky.social
Happening today at 1.00 pm (CET), title slide for a teaser!
Title slide of a presentation titled "Distinction Without a Difference? Natural vs. Cultural Heritage in the Spotlight of Restitution Claims", showing a picture of a dinosaur skeleton at a museum and a Benin bronze.
p-stewens.bsky.social
Event announcement! Next Wednesday (12 March), I'll tell you why it's not productive to think of natural history and cultural property as two separate worlds. The talk will be online at 1.00 pm (CET), so feel free to join me over lunch!

For all relevant information: paul-stewens.com/news/talk-na...
The Giraffatitan brancai skeleton on display at the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin.