pakucha1.bsky.social
@pakucha1.bsky.social
emm, so, because i pointed out a mistake of your part, i must be from the enemy! if i don't admit you are correct, and dont stay silent when you make a doubtful statement, i anm suspected to be the enemy... the fanboy! ok. have a nice day.
October 21, 2025 at 3:17 PM
what is this then, why you're quoting it?
October 21, 2025 at 3:13 PM
because i pointed out a inaccurate translation, my intentions are in doubt? or, are we going to waste time discussing about quotation marks?
October 21, 2025 at 3:08 PM
Again. biased or not, debate, proof blabla. a solid basis isn't going to be ruined by some random hater.
October 21, 2025 at 3:06 PM
I agree, let get over it. and, I am not pro ai without basic protection for the workers either.

but that is a very complex problem.
October 21, 2025 at 2:43 PM
my condition as a fake account or just someone who doesn't like to speak over social platforms doesn't change the weak link of your proof.
October 21, 2025 at 2:41 PM
lets see...you post 3 images, 1 of them is a carefully written statement of the role of ai developed as supportive to creatives. i pointed that it are inaccurate. you indicate that there are images 2 and 3, so i could ignore the weak link in your proof. and, tha I might have evil intentions...
October 21, 2025 at 2:37 PM
i do think a Just cause requires reliable proof, it should be open to be questioned, doubted, and the proof will make the cause more believable. Otherwise...

for example, if my critique was wrong, it is a proof of your point.
October 21, 2025 at 2:30 PM
i think ai is going to stay in every aspect of our lives... it's just a matter of time.
October 21, 2025 at 2:23 PM
it seems that the massive firings over game industry has already began with Microsoft's studios( i believe 3-4 waves of firings in 12 months. last week EA made it very clear that they plans to use ai to cut cost. I have fell that they are going to have a few of unpleasant surprises, but...
October 21, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Done. that point is over. Do you think they will take the Duolingo approach, of human auditing ai generated content or use ai as low level assistants to senior writers and artists?
October 21, 2025 at 2:16 PM
I understand that when someone question the proof for your point, you might feel attacked, which is not the intention. but again, please use reliable proof. all the links contexts over weixin losses credibility when your proof isn't what you claim it to be.
October 21, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Did i at any point indicate anything else then the translation problem? no. btw, do i trust mihoyos ethics with ai? Also No.
October 21, 2025 at 2:00 PM
lets try again, did you read what I posted? does it seem to be different form what you posted? as, the senteses try to indicate a supportive role for the ai that the they develop? start add context from there. it can be obviously a lie, we dont know. but they aren't that shameless on the image.
October 21, 2025 at 1:59 PM
I proved my point, you proved what kind of discussion you enjoy and what kind of tactics you like to use.
October 21, 2025 at 1:47 PM
you know what kind of people usues thin kind of tactics?
October 21, 2025 at 1:45 PM
So, i follow corina is proving my point about a wrong translation...wrong? or, because "AI evil" you are infallible, can't be doubted, your words are some kind of axiom?
October 21, 2025 at 1:44 PM
(...)

AI technology can also be used to assist in the production of three-view drawings and 3D models.”
October 21, 2025 at 1:41 PM
“By developing relevant AI technologies, we can rotate pre-designed sprites or chibi characters using only a small amount of material. This allows art staff to intuitively experience the effects of different angles after completing the front view, aiding early verification.

(...)
October 21, 2025 at 1:41 PM
For the sake of argument, im posting the text on the image. Lets see if the readers can detect the difference. lets debate based on the facts. Don't one of "those guys".
October 21, 2025 at 1:40 PM
did you made the quote between ""s or not?
October 21, 2025 at 1:31 PM
the guy who posted a inaccurate translation on internet suspects the motivation of someone who pointed out the wrong translation is just laughable.
October 21, 2025 at 1:30 PM
and lets br real, the way the trxt orginally said read a lot less guilty than the way you "quoted".
October 21, 2025 at 1:26 PM
you quoted, and quoted a inaccurate version of it. that is a lot easier to understand than now, whrn you are trying to argue instead of making a correction.
October 21, 2025 at 1:25 PM
Am not going to do your work for you, ( it takes a second on any translation app anyways)but, do better. fight for your cause using the facts.
October 21, 2025 at 1:22 PM