Pathless Pilgrim ⓥ
banner
pathlesspilgrim.bsky.social
Pathless Pilgrim ⓥ
@pathlesspilgrim.bsky.social
Advocating for animal rights since 1986.
Vegan for 40 years.
Animal Rights essays at: PathlessPilgrim.com
That is very disappointing. Such a good book, too - 125 vegan essays for free!
I can't actually win as I'm in the UK, but hopefully it will pick up and get more responses before the deadline.
January 14, 2026 at 5:11 AM
Exactly. Not a lifestyle. Not a diet. A moral refusal to participate in violence.
January 13, 2026 at 6:02 PM
Once we see animals as someone instead of something, veganism becomes the only coherent response.
January 13, 2026 at 4:38 PM
Fascinating and optimistic article - thank you
January 13, 2026 at 5:19 AM
Forgive me for asking the obvious question here, but why don't you just buy vegan cheese?
January 12, 2026 at 5:13 AM
👍
January 10, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Tom Regan summarised the problem with the utilitarian argument in a way that is clear and unequivocal - see below
www.pathlesspilgrim.com/animal-right...
Pathless Pilgrim - Animal Rights and Utilitarianism
How Tom Regan destroyed Peter Singer’s position in under three minutes
www.pathlesspilgrim.com
January 10, 2026 at 5:53 PM
Everyone’s seen the footage. They’ve already seen behind the “glass walls.”

The horror isn’t that suffering is concealed. It’s that people can watch it, understand it, and still carry on as if nothing happened.
This isn’t an information problem. It’s a moral disengagement problem.
January 10, 2026 at 5:38 PM
I have a big issue with this popular idea that veganism is about "causing the least harm". That's a very utilitarian ideal. It's the kind of thinking that makes people argue it's better to eat a cow than to eat wheat ("crop deaths tho").

Veganism is a deontological stance, not a utilitarian one.
January 10, 2026 at 5:10 PM
Well actually, no. If everybody ONLY went vegan and never talked about it, that would be fantasic. If everybody ONLY talked about it and never went vegan, that would be terrible.
January 10, 2026 at 4:13 PM
I believe my analogy is sound. If I were a slave, I'd have more respect for someone who didn't keep slaves or torture anyone, even if they didn't speak out against slavery, rather than the hypocrite who talks a lot about ending slavery, yet keeps me captive and tortures me.
January 10, 2026 at 3:52 PM
If I was the victim, I'd prefer someone who kept their mouths shut but left me alone to live my life, rather than someone who professed peace and respect in public, but kicked the sh*t out of me every time they saw me and might actually kill me one day
January 10, 2026 at 3:41 PM
January 10, 2026 at 3:37 PM
Richard Dawkins is a strange one - he understands all the ethical arguments for veganism intellectually, yet continues to pay to have them killed.
Go figure
January 10, 2026 at 3:30 PM
♥️
January 10, 2026 at 3:14 PM
This is tragic.
Sadly, mass death isn’t seen as a tragedy when it’s profitable - it’s seen as a business model. But when the victims are wild and unprofitable, we call it a crisis.
January 10, 2026 at 3:14 PM