Patrick Iber
@patrickiber.bsky.social
6.9K followers 700 following 2.5K posts
Co-editor, Dissent Magazine. I teach history at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Write books about Cold War culture and propaganda. Have written for the set of all publications that are not members of themselves
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Patrick Iber
hntdove.bsky.social
Hell of a thing to put next to a statue of Joan of Arc. (h/t David Pilling)
Fire extinguisher next to a statue of Joan of Arc
patrickiber.bsky.social
When AI-generated fake news popped up I think most of us were worried about its use to fool others, but it turns out we should have been most worried about the right using it to fool itself
josie.zone
Kind of hilarious how we didn't even need a real Reichstag Fire because the fascists are so cocooned in fake news and A.I.-generated video that they falsely assume there are 800 Reichstag Fires happening at once
patrickiber.bsky.social
You could scan it quickly and get the point, I don't think there's much to be gained beyond that
patrickiber.bsky.social
1) I think the basic argument is compelling enough; 2) I've used it with undergrads and there's a lot there that they need to struggle with to grasp; 3) more advanced readers will have quibbles, Tim Barker had some fair ones, intemperately presented; 4) for you, "meh" seems about right
patrickiber.bsky.social
My review of Osita Nwanevu's The Right of the People is here; 1) we have a short window to improve American democracy; 2) a Second Reconstruction is a good way to imagine it; 3) we need to learn from Chile's (unsuccessful) recent attempt and build wide support newrepublic.com/article/2011...
Can America Become a Democracy?
What it would take for the United States to live up to the promise of its founding
newrepublic.com
patrickiber.bsky.social
I started during the pandemic so I always know how long it has been. Doing chess now and really enjoying it, I think it’s actually better than their language instruction
patrickiber.bsky.social
Totally. I ran cross country in high school and was never better than 18 minutes where varsity was 15:30-16. But 30 years later I’m still running and just trying to do my best!
patrickiber.bsky.social
My main sport is ultimate so I'm not always training for distance, but I did a charity 5k about a week ago in 22:30 and was well pleased. (I'm 44.) 19 minutes would be really impressive.
patrickiber.bsky.social
As part of our section on Authoritarianism and Resistance in the most recent @dissentmag.bsky.social, Julia Gavarette writes about El Salvador's criminalization of dissent and the people facing a choice of prison or exile--and those with no choice at all www.dissentmagazine.org/article/a-pe...
A Permanent State of Exception in El Salvador - Dissent Magazine
In cooperation with gangs and with massive popular support, Nayib Bukele is cracking down on dissidents and expanding the state’s carceral apparatus.
www.dissentmagazine.org
patrickiber.bsky.social
Got real fashy at the end though
patrickiber.bsky.social
Dissent hosted a conversation by ex-conservatives who moved to the left in 2020, in case you're curious www.dissentmagazine.org/article/why-...
patrickiber.bsky.social
Uruguay's voters decided to it was best to give its military a general amnesty after the return of democracy to keep the military in the barracks; different South American countries have handled these questions differently and no matter what choice you make it's very delicate
patrickiber.bsky.social
The institutional memories are different, but I know what you mean
patrickiber.bsky.social
Lucky for me they seem to be committed to doing that anyway so I guess I don't have to worry about it too much la la la
patrickiber.bsky.social
I hate that reading the news makes me have to think about questions of transitional justice: like, if we commit to persecuting regime officials who commit crimes, are they more likely to hang on to power undemocratically in order to avoid prison
patrickiber.bsky.social
The whole federal government is in violation of the Hatch Act right now, but it doesn't matter because no one will enforce it; just another example of why we are no longer under the "rule of law"
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
These are all horrible, but this is just disgusting.
justice.gov

Democrats have shut down the government. Department of Justice websites are not currently regularly updated. Please refer to the Department of Justice's contingency plan for more information.

An official website of the United States government Here's how you know 

U.S. Department of
JUSTICE
patrickiber.bsky.social
Yes, I found it quite surprising that that is the way it looked from 1987!
patrickiber.bsky.social
Oof: "Pinochet does not ask the owners of the newspaper [El Mercurio] what they have done with the hundred million dollars, and El Mercurio does not ask Pinochet what he has done with the people--more than seven hundred of them--who have disappeared in Chile after being arrested by the military."
The regime has perfected the tech- nique of identifying themes likely to capture the popular imagination, and of using messages and images to dis- tract the public. Of course, there is nothing new about Pinochet's al- lowing El Mercurio to run up a debt to the government of roughly a hundred million dollars, and thus being able to count on its unconditional support. Pi- nochet does not ask the owners of the newspaper, the Edwards family, what they have done with the hundred mil- lion dollars, and El Mercurio does not ask Pinochet what he has done with the people more than seven hundred of them--who have disappeared in
Chile after being arrested by the mili.
patrickiber.bsky.social
Have you had any of these kind of thoughts about exile?
Then come the financial considera- tions and the negotiations with the United Nations High Commission for Refugees. This stage is usually fol lowed by doubts and ambivalence: it is possible that Pinochet may continue in power only another year. Going inte exile also poses risks that must be con- sidered. The children may marry for- eigners while they are living abroad, and may not want to return to Chile
when the dictator is overthrown. There are usually grandparents to think about; often they are in ill health. In addition, going into exile means that you lose your job, your professional qualifications, and your home. When a family faces exile, the countless elements that make up its life are all swept up in a devastating
whirlwind. Exiles who have returned to Chile cannot help those who must make a decision about whether to escape. The exile's return is painful, despite the help of a team of psychologists spon- sored by the Catholic, Lutheran, and Methodist churches. It is not easy to renter Chilean life, and most exiles find that political solidarity has been extinguished by the repression and that economic solidarity has been made
impossible by the hard times. The confusion suffered by adoles- cents and young people who return is expressed in their relations with the country and with their parents. In Eu- rope, the United States, or some of the other Latin-American countries, they have been able to enjoy almost bound- less freedom, and have become accus- tomed to it. Now they find themselves in a country that is almost unknown to them. They are startled by constant warnings from their parents about the limits they must observe. During the children's exile, the influence of the parents was strong, because the chil- dren saw them as linked to the recap- ture of their country. The children of whole families that have returned from exile look upon Chile, according to "Exilio, 1978-1986," a book writ-
ten by a group of psychologists, as "the land of their parents and the friends of their parents, a land un- known, yet also desired, by the ado- lescents." Once the parents are back in Chile, however, they seem over- come by difficulties. Their spirits seem
broken: they do not know how to
patrickiber.bsky.social
So I found these passages of people speculating about other possible ends to the dictatorship to be a fascinating little view on that moment in time
Of the Chileans who believe that it is vitally necessary to eliminate Pi- nochet, the majority would prefer to see the United States do it, rather than the Communists. They believe that the Chilean armed forces would accept the operation if it were to be carried out by Washington, but that terrible, indis- criminate repression would be un- leashed if the Communists were to assassinate Pinochet, and this would consolidate the military regime. The truth is, however, that at the moment the United States has other plans for Chile. They are not violent, as they were with Nixon and his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger. They are also far removed from the magic solution that Chilean politicians dream about- an Operation Chile to remove Pi- nochet which would be over in twen- ty-four hours. It is widely believed that the Reagan Administration wants the Chilean armed forces themselves to bring the Pinochet dictatorship to a close--peacefully and, if possible, within the legal framework of the regime. Pinochet would be allowed to spend the rest of his days in a country of his choice; the political parties would be expected to allow the military to return to their barracks in peace; and the Chilean Communist
Party would be isolated. Although the proposal is simple, carrying it out would be extremely complex. Pinochet has his own friends in Washington, headed by Senator Jesse Helms and Jeane Kirkpatrick, the former ambassador to the United Nations, and he is maneuvering all the time. Pinochet is extremely good at political maneuvering. The Chilean political parties, for their part, have no common objective, even after fourteen years of dictatorship. Although their leaders have been together in jails, in exile, in the underground resistance,
not one has ever managed to learn that he must sacrifice what may seem to be a benefit for his own party in pursuit
of a common objective. What Washington has achieved in a short time, merely by changing its ambassador and its attitude, is, for the first time in Latin America, the peo- ple's acceptance-with enthusiasm, or, at least, with resignation of United States intervention. Pinochet's author- itarian personality and the savagery of the military repression have contrib- uted enormously to this acceptance of American intervention. The accep- tance was demonstrated in notable fashion toward the end of 1986 in a conference at the headquarters of Chile's professional association of journalists, in Santiago. A panel of political leaders from the right, the left, and the center discussed seri-
ously, rationally, and with equanimity -the possible participation of Wash- ington in the overthrow of Pinochet and the American role in a period of transition to democracy. The topic was "Prospects for American Policy Toward Chile," and, naturally, the major complaints came from the left, but they did not constitute the tradi- tional, virulent attack on imperialist policies. Instead, the left, viewing the situation almost with sadness, la- mented that the United States inter- vened only in cases of crisis and, un- fortunately, the American experts did not yet detect a crisis in Chile. Wash- ington has achieved its consensus that no crisis exists because over the past two years it has publicized its almost constant criticism of human-rights vi- olations in Chile and has intervened to call for the lifting of restrictions on
press freedom.