Paul Rowe
@pauldrowe.bsky.social
Applied logician. Polyglot. Interested in curiosity, not dogma.
Oh I hope you didn’t think I was giving you advice! It was more like, “It never occurred to me until way later, and that’s maybe a shame.”
December 1, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Oh I hope you didn’t think I was giving you advice! It was more like, “It never occurred to me until way later, and that’s maybe a shame.”
But I do think it’s not emphasized enough that it would work. Same for using the product rule to differentiate x^2, for example.
December 1, 2025 at 1:55 AM
But I do think it’s not emphasized enough that it would work. Same for using the product rule to differentiate x^2, for example.
The literal physical effects of being immersed in a proof are really hard to explain to non-mathematicians.
November 30, 2025 at 2:15 AM
The literal physical effects of being immersed in a proof are really hard to explain to non-mathematicians.
In fairness, the free trial usually comes with at least *risk* of cost involving, say, providing a credit card number.
If it was fully free, they wouldn’t need that.
If it was fully free, they wouldn’t need that.
November 21, 2025 at 12:29 AM
In fairness, the free trial usually comes with at least *risk* of cost involving, say, providing a credit card number.
If it was fully free, they wouldn’t need that.
If it was fully free, they wouldn’t need that.
I think it’s the pattern and texture on the foreground blanket that first evokes a painting feel. Great pic of a great cat!
November 20, 2025 at 3:31 AM
I think it’s the pattern and texture on the foreground blanket that first evokes a painting feel. Great pic of a great cat!
Wait, that’s actually a photo? Several details made me think it was another in the trend I’ve seen of cat pic watercolors.
November 20, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Wait, that’s actually a photo? Several details made me think it was another in the trend I’ve seen of cat pic watercolors.
I’m intrigued. Please say more.
November 18, 2025 at 3:18 AM
I’m intrigued. Please say more.
It’s so good. I love the attention to detail.
November 16, 2025 at 2:44 AM
It’s so good. I love the attention to detail.
Let’s not forget that Ben Wyatt is a Carleton grad.
November 16, 2025 at 2:34 AM
Let’s not forget that Ben Wyatt is a Carleton grad.
You might even say, “Thank techbros for God.”
November 15, 2025 at 1:47 AM
You might even say, “Thank techbros for God.”
🤯
And the difference between angels and aliens seems significant. The fact that the option is aliens seems somehow worse to me.
And the difference between angels and aliens seems significant. The fact that the option is aliens seems somehow worse to me.
November 1, 2025 at 1:13 AM
🤯
And the difference between angels and aliens seems significant. The fact that the option is aliens seems somehow worse to me.
And the difference between angels and aliens seems significant. The fact that the option is aliens seems somehow worse to me.
Wait, is the debate about whether
(a) DMT lets you talk to
supernatural beings or not, or
(b) whether the supernatural beings DMT lets you talk to are angels or demons?
(a) DMT lets you talk to
supernatural beings or not, or
(b) whether the supernatural beings DMT lets you talk to are angels or demons?
November 1, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Wait, is the debate about whether
(a) DMT lets you talk to
supernatural beings or not, or
(b) whether the supernatural beings DMT lets you talk to are angels or demons?
(a) DMT lets you talk to
supernatural beings or not, or
(b) whether the supernatural beings DMT lets you talk to are angels or demons?
I got six in the span of about three minutes
October 31, 2025 at 5:27 PM
I got six in the span of about three minutes
I’ll answer your question with a question: what are your priors about my priors?
October 31, 2025 at 1:00 AM
I’ll answer your question with a question: what are your priors about my priors?