@paulinegrippa.bsky.social
390 followers 610 following 13 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
Why? Because supplanting subgroups challenge who gets to define the movement. Our findings reveal that symbolic threat and competition over prototypicality are drivers of internal conflict—suggesting that not all in-group tensions are about goals or values, but about who gets to define the movement.
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
Across three experiments, these groups were seen as more threatening than internal allies, and sometimes even more competitive than ideological opponents by members of dominant subgroups.
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
Specifically, we investigated how dominant subgroup members react to “supplanting” subgroups—ideologically distinct newcomers gaining public recognition.
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
New paper in the International Review of Social Psychology! 👀

Following our qualitative study on conflicts within the French-speaking Belgian feminist movement (lnkd.in/gxQEVWRN), Laurent Licata and I wanted to experimentally investigate intergroup conflicts within social movements.
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
🤝 Importantly, many participants also emphasized collaboration and solidarity, showing that shared goals can coexist with internal disagreement.

We argue that these forms of perceived threat can help explain internal tensions—not just in feminism, but in social movements more broadly.
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
More established groups, like universal feminists, may perceive newer voices, such as intersectional feminists, as a threat to their long-held position. Conversely, newer subgroups may feel that established ones receive disproportionate recognition and seek greater visibility within the movement.
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
Second, and interestingly, our results suggest that different subgroups within the feminist movement can compete over recognition and visibility to be perceived as the "true feminist".
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
Our findings suggest two potential sources of conflict.

First, as expected, feminists can disagree to a point of no return on what feminism is and what its aims should be. We link that to the perception of symbolic threat, often used in social psychology to study intergroup conflicts.
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
In this study, we explore how tensions emerge within the feminist movement. We conducted 18 interviews with French-speaking Belgian feminists to uncover how they perceive internal debates, rivalries and cooperation.
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
I am so excited to announce the publication of my first PhD paper, written in collaboration with Laurent Licata and amazing participants!

“We Are No Longer the First to Lead the Dance”: Analysing Intergroup Conflicts Within the French-Speaking Belgian Feminist Movement

doi.org/10.1002/casp...
doi.org
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
New paper accepted in @ispp-pops.bsky.social !!

@paulbertin.bsky.social and I investigated sport fans’ boycott of the 2022 FIFA World Cup 👀👀
paulbertin.bsky.social
New paper on sports fans and political behaviors now in press at bsky.app/profile/ispp...

In late 2022, @paulinegrippa.bsky.social and I conducted an intercultural, longitudinal study on fans' motives for (not) boycotting the 2022 World Cup.

A 🧵
paulinegrippa.bsky.social
Hi ! I would like to be added as well :) Thanks !