Good stuff. As to the last point, you did paint me as a right-wing weirdo because I oppose the murder of political adversaries, though!

I hope you're okay.

If you wanted to sound natural, "...than you seem to realize" would've been a better option.

Nice projection. You presumably do it a lot.

Yes, the weirdos are those who oppose murdering political adversaries!

Also, you're just a social Darwinist, not a consistent leftist, if you believe that beings capable of suffering can be harmed by humans because of their intelligence or physical traits.

Deserved ban, and I say that as a leftist. Though to suggest that we shouldn't joke about the murder of Charlie Kirk would probably be indicative of me being in the far-right, to some people.

Lovable tomatoes!

Non-vegans pay for animals to be tortured and slaughtered to please their tastebuds. They're not entitled to demand people be soft on them, "else they're not going to change." This is blackmail and would not be accepted anywhere else.

Rhetoric matters, but any suffering we promote is our own fault.

Mantenho a posição de que *nenhum* ser humano deve ser sujeito a sofrimento desnecessário, mas, para fim geral da discussão, creio que o tio da Laura não seja nazista, e que falar de nazistas para legitimar atitudes ruins contra pessoas que não são nazistas é ruim.

Eu me interesso em reduzir as dores do mundo, razão pela qual sou de esquerda, então sou incapaz de pensar assim.

Um trote que leva a sofrimento desnecessário a outro ser humano. Seu tio tem uma visão de mundo ruim, mas tratá-lo assim não gera benefício ao mundo e não é um ato tornado aceitável pela visão dele. Não precisamos ou devemos agir assim com as pessoas.