Maurice Khayat
@peeingredagain.bsky.social
900 followers 98 following 96 posts
Nephrologist and academic hospitalist at Dallas VA Medical Center. Assistant Professor of Medicine, UT Southwestern.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
peeingredagain.bsky.social
Yup, and yet CKD is a major risk factor for AKI!
peeingredagain.bsky.social
True, improving pre-renal can also be clinically hard to tell apart from recovering ATN depending on when they present.
peeingredagain.bsky.social
This encapsulates my feelings on FeNa reasonably well. It still has some good use-cases, but we need to stop using it indiscriminately for every AKI!

(Ref below, VA markup/emphasis mine)

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
peeingredagain.bsky.social
Ha, I did think of that and downgraded my language to "most" :)
peeingredagain.bsky.social
In a lot of ways medicine is like troubleshooting a computer, but not all the parts are replaceable and in most cases "have you tried turning it off and back on again?" isn't useful advice.
peeingredagain.bsky.social
Hang on let me write this down:
"prescribe more ACEi, fewer snakebites." OK, got it!
peeingredagain.bsky.social
With the PTH not super elevated I imagine there's less risk for adynamic bone dz with a bisphosphonate. Although, I'm unsure of the target iPTH when using it for 1°HPT. Looks like I'm d/t do some reading. :)
peeingredagain.bsky.social
Either way would be risk/benefit discussion with the patient about the unclear risk and benefit and make the decision together.
peeingredagain.bsky.social
My $0.02: your patient doesn't fit neatly into any trials. Benefit unclear but maybe a 24h uCa & see if the hypercalciuria is resolved?

Figure if high bonr turnover...Ca has to go somewhere, right?

If PTH still overly active I'd favour cinacalcet but PO bisphos probably reasonable (& titratable)?
peeingredagain.bsky.social
What's the weather like up there?
Reposted by Maurice Khayat
nepherson.bsky.social
Standard metformin practice is:

GFR 45+. No changes
GfR 30-45. Decrease dose
(but don’t initiate new therapy)
GFR <30. Discontinue

But maybe some low risk patients with CKD IV are losing a benefit by discontinuing their metformin?
sjenkinsmd.bsky.social
We often stop metformin when eGFR < 30 (CKD stage 4). In this observational study of 4,278 patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD stage 4, stopping metformin (40.1% of patients) was associated with lower 3-year survival (63.7% vs 70.5%). Time for an RCT? #MedSky #NephSky www.ajkd.org/article/S027...
Stopping Versus Continuing Metformin in Patients With Advanced CKD: A Nationwide Scottish Target Trial Emulation Study
Despite a lack of supporting evidence, current guidance recommends against the use of metformin in people with advanced kidney impairment. This observational study compared the outcomes of patients wi...
www.ajkd.org
peeingredagain.bsky.social
I'm curious if the CKD4 patients had a higher eGFR Cr-Cys C? Would be nice to see new safety data with updated assessment methods!
peeingredagain.bsky.social
Egophony is just sound. I wonder if there's a Doppler equivalent on POCUS?
peeingredagain.bsky.social
Dad jokes are pretty benign.
peeingredagain.bsky.social
I swear the word "spellcheck" was in there somewhere
peeingredagain.bsky.social
What I can't seem to do is my posts prior to posting them...
peeingredagain.bsky.social
Getting caught up on my HoP episodes!

On the subjevt of poisonings: I wanted to share this diagram to estimate the best method to use to enhance elimination from the body.

I also can't overstate how helpful poison control is in these situations. Make sure to call them!!
peeingredagain.bsky.social
It's been a long time comung, but at our lab we just implemented a cystatin C panel. It adds a Cr automatically and outputs a calculated eGFR Cr-Cys C automatically!

Since the Cr is the cheaper test it makes sense to add it on in most cases.
peeingredagain.bsky.social
When I was younger I just to have cool dreams. Now my dreams are "we need to treat this RPGN patient but no one can find the biopsy results."
peeingredagain.bsky.social
Done. Let me know your thoughts.
peeingredagain.bsky.social
(6) The authors proposed comparing ABG/BMP might help diagnose equipment errors.

My conclusion: both methods have potential pitfalls For bizarre results, checking against the *other* method might help confirm that it's real (both directions!).

Oh and definitely check an ABG in a lipidemic pt :)
peeingredagain.bsky.social
(4, cont'd) the agreement between chem panels and ABGs seems to vary by device and lab methods used, but in the quoted study they agreed in ~95% & ~99% for ±2 & ±3 mmol/L (respectively).
(5) Common pre-prep errors were trialed and it didn't seem to effect the results by much.
(6) →
peeingredagain.bsky.social
(3) This covers the case where there are ↑triglycerides, but doesn't really say which is more accurate in general.

*** many pubmed searches later ***

I came across this article (see excerpt):

academic.oup.com/clinchem/art...

(4) After getting access to the article (finally), I learned this →
Comparison of Measured and Calculated Bicarbonate Values
Patient acid–base status may be assessed by measuring bicarbonate (HCO3−) in serum or plasma from a sample of venous blood. HCO3− values are also frequentl
academic.oup.com
peeingredagain.bsky.social
@raghumnephdoc.bsky.social please forgive my delayed response. You sent a great article, so I wanted to scrutinize it properly! Here's what I learned:

(1) ↑↑triglycerides interfere w/any indirect ISE measured HCO₃⁻ (same as in pseudo-↓Na!)
(2) Most automated chem panels use indirect ISE
(3) →
raghumnephdoc.bsky.social
www.ajkd.org/article/S027...
This article in AJKD seems to suggest that POC ABG derived HCo3 is free from interference due to lipids and stuff.