petersrin
@petersrin.com
So... He's light-headed?
a close up of a man with his eyes closed and his mouth open .
Alt: Man putting on sunglasses like he's cool
media.tenor.com
December 29, 2025 at 11:58 AM
So... He's light-headed?
Same. But since I have no friends I do it on r/movies
December 28, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Same. But since I have no friends I do it on r/movies
That's literally where this conversation ends. How do people not get that?!
Rapists should be prosecuted. Tada
Rapists should be prosecuted. Tada
December 28, 2025 at 7:46 PM
That's literally where this conversation ends. How do people not get that?!
Rapists should be prosecuted. Tada
Rapists should be prosecuted. Tada
You have made baseless claims against the veracity of her past experience, put words into Tyla and my mouth (I implied she was evil and therefore unqualified, but I guess you missed that lol), and then doubled down instead of recognizing that truth exists separate from feeling. Stop. Anywho, bye.
December 28, 2025 at 7:19 PM
You have made baseless claims against the veracity of her past experience, put words into Tyla and my mouth (I implied she was evil and therefore unqualified, but I guess you missed that lol), and then doubled down instead of recognizing that truth exists separate from feeling. Stop. Anywho, bye.
There are plenty of things to question in her bio. Is she truly a human rights expert? What does that mean? I would have to dig into her cases and leanings to know. But EVEN THESE things are verifiable or discretitable on facts alone, without resorting to the very BS rhetoric we claim to abhore.
December 28, 2025 at 7:19 PM
There are plenty of things to question in her bio. Is she truly a human rights expert? What does that mean? I would have to dig into her cases and leanings to know. But EVEN THESE things are verifiable or discretitable on facts alone, without resorting to the very BS rhetoric we claim to abhore.
Saying she is unqualified because she is a salon owner is anti-truth, which we criticize MAGA for promoting all the time. It is also particularly prevalent against women, specifically. "Wife." "Bartender." "Salon owner." I WILL concede we do this to men too. "Reality tv star" comes to mind.
December 28, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Saying she is unqualified because she is a salon owner is anti-truth, which we criticize MAGA for promoting all the time. It is also particularly prevalent against women, specifically. "Wife." "Bartender." "Salon owner." I WILL concede we do this to men too. "Reality tv star" comes to mind.
Regarding experience, we have seen MANY that Trump installs that have virtually zero experience. This is not one of those cases. I checked several of the experience items she has listed and they are accurate (based on things like wikipedia significantly prior to Dec. 22, just to eliminate "cover up"
December 28, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Regarding experience, we have seen MANY that Trump installs that have virtually zero experience. This is not one of those cases. I checked several of the experience items she has listed and they are accurate (based on things like wikipedia significantly prior to Dec. 22, just to eliminate "cover up"
Read ANY of our replies again. "She has experience." Not "she's qualified." We are not arguing that she's qualified. We are arguing that distilling a woman down to her lowest common denominator job she's ever held (which apparently is a gross distilation of her actual work) is disingenuous.
December 28, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Read ANY of our replies again. "She has experience." Not "she's qualified." We are not arguing that she's qualified. We are arguing that distilling a woman down to her lowest common denominator job she's ever held (which apparently is a gross distilation of her actual work) is disingenuous.
Thanks. Yeah, misinformation becomes easier every day.
December 28, 2025 at 6:38 PM
Thanks. Yeah, misinformation becomes easier every day.
Listen to Tyla. We have to fight hard, even when it's uncomfortable, against the post-truth era we're living in.
December 28, 2025 at 6:31 PM
Listen to Tyla. We have to fight hard, even when it's uncomfortable, against the post-truth era we're living in.
Yeah when I saw "former beauty salon owner" it rang as a hollow attempt at discrediting, much like when maga rags on aoc about being a former bartender. I don't give a fuck if one one their past jobs isn't related. So they have experience? Are they evil? If both are no I'm happy. She has experience.
December 28, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Yeah when I saw "former beauty salon owner" it rang as a hollow attempt at discrediting, much like when maga rags on aoc about being a former bartender. I don't give a fuck if one one their past jobs isn't related. So they have experience? Are they evil? If both are no I'm happy. She has experience.
Doesn't seem much of a stretch to call it an assassination. Checks enough boxes on definitions from sources most English speakers rely on. Interesting that Oxford language, Google's source for definitions, is so dumbed down.
December 27, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Doesn't seem much of a stretch to call it an assassination. Checks enough boxes on definitions from sources most English speakers rely on. Interesting that Oxford language, Google's source for definitions, is so dumbed down.
The murder of a person (esp. a prominent public figure) in a planned attack, typically with a political or ideological motive, sometimes carried out by a hired or professional killer...
- oxford dictionary
Planned? If shells are real, yeah. Prominent public figure? Less defensible than important
- oxford dictionary
Planned? If shells are real, yeah. Prominent public figure? Less defensible than important
December 27, 2025 at 4:58 PM
The murder of a person (esp. a prominent public figure) in a planned attack, typically with a political or ideological motive, sometimes carried out by a hired or professional killer...
- oxford dictionary
Planned? If shells are real, yeah. Prominent public figure? Less defensible than important
- oxford dictionary
Planned? If shells are real, yeah. Prominent public figure? Less defensible than important
Assassination:
murder (an important person) in a surprise attack for political or religious reasons.
- oxford language
The question is of importance: he has 3.8m subscribers on YouTube beforehand. He was speaking in front of a decent crowd.
murder (an important person) in a surprise attack for political or religious reasons.
- oxford language
The question is of importance: he has 3.8m subscribers on YouTube beforehand. He was speaking in front of a decent crowd.
December 27, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Assassination:
murder (an important person) in a surprise attack for political or religious reasons.
- oxford language
The question is of importance: he has 3.8m subscribers on YouTube beforehand. He was speaking in front of a decent crowd.
murder (an important person) in a surprise attack for political or religious reasons.
- oxford language
The question is of importance: he has 3.8m subscribers on YouTube beforehand. He was speaking in front of a decent crowd.
Sorry that money is earmarked for billionaires
December 25, 2025 at 5:32 AM
Sorry that money is earmarked for billionaires
Not missed. It was released in 2024 so there was no reason to redact it now.
December 21, 2025 at 5:39 AM
Not missed. It was released in 2024 so there was no reason to redact it now.
Whomever ends up in charge is going to need to make some tough choices. They're going to have to legislate away their own powers and the powers of those around them. They will be incredibly unpopular in powerful circles and will only get one term because of it. Basically, it'll take a real hero
December 20, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Whomever ends up in charge is going to need to make some tough choices. They're going to have to legislate away their own powers and the powers of those around them. They will be incredibly unpopular in powerful circles and will only get one term because of it. Basically, it'll take a real hero
Yup. Buy low, wait for someone to fix things, sell high. The rich will always profit.
December 20, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Yup. Buy low, wait for someone to fix things, sell high. The rich will always profit.
Art is important. The dignity of rape victims and the punishment of rapists is more important. A name can be undone.
December 20, 2025 at 3:28 PM
Art is important. The dignity of rape victims and the punishment of rapists is more important. A name can be undone.
Yep. It is a property of zero lol
December 19, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Yep. It is a property of zero lol
"like you just used Google here" implied you were talking about these specific photos. Sorry for the misunderstanding, but yes, it's become difficult to trust anything online. We must all invest time in separating truth from fiction.
December 19, 2025 at 4:48 PM
"like you just used Google here" implied you were talking about these specific photos. Sorry for the misunderstanding, but yes, it's become difficult to trust anything online. We must all invest time in separating truth from fiction.
The black levels in the kissing photo are different despite identical setting, time, and lighting. The shots are blurry despite the source being clear. Imo this specific image is fake.
December 19, 2025 at 3:41 PM
The black levels in the kissing photo are different despite identical setting, time, and lighting. The shots are blurry despite the source being clear. Imo this specific image is fake.
The point of sources is that you can't trust them, but you can follow the breadcrumbs they lay out.
The source images were posted in the guardian in 2020. The caption states the wrong event, using one that would be more familiar to generate more virility.
The source images were posted in the guardian in 2020. The caption states the wrong event, using one that would be more familiar to generate more virility.
December 19, 2025 at 3:39 PM
The point of sources is that you can't trust them, but you can follow the breadcrumbs they lay out.
The source images were posted in the guardian in 2020. The caption states the wrong event, using one that would be more familiar to generate more virility.
The source images were posted in the guardian in 2020. The caption states the wrong event, using one that would be more familiar to generate more virility.