Peter Tulip
@petertulip.bsky.social
650 followers 62 following 180 posts
Chief economist at Centre for Independent Studies
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
petertulip.bsky.social
This paper summarises what I see as the key points in the Australian housing debate, as of February 2024.
www.cis.org.au/wp-content/u... 1/8
www.cis.org.au
petertulip.bsky.social
Apparently some Trotskyists don't like the authors of this column.
Nevertheless, housing policy in Auckland led to a 28% reduction in rent, relative to other NZ cities.
It is foolish not to ask whether other cities around the globe might learn from that.
petertulip.bsky.social
When the electorate realises that stimulating demand worsens affordability, the Federal government will need to do something to boost housing supply.
And not just social housing. Something for the 96% of households who live in market housing.
Reposted by Peter Tulip
uytaelee.bsky.social
I'll be in Brisbane next week! As part of my trip, I'll be hosting a more informal event open to anyone at the Queensland University of Technology on Tuesday, October 7th. Details below:
Reposted by Peter Tulip
grugstan.bsky.social
Detailed figures for the freaks out there. I'll be getting more of these on different configurations and include the other four Greater Brisbane councils over the next few weeks.
Reposted by Peter Tulip
grugstan.bsky.social
I've been working with @dbecon.bsky.social to work out some figures on Brisbane's zoning and we started looking at character restrictions.

Within 5km of Brisbane's CBD, a whopping 64% of all residential properties have some kind of character restrictions. That's 57% of land or 2,204 hectares.
petertulip.bsky.social
I actually found youtube videos to be accessible and at my level. I will try to find the ones I liked.
Reposted by Peter Tulip
grattaninstitute.bsky.social
Sydney remains ground zero for Australia’s housing crisis.

Our housing policy expert Brendan Coates gives the NSW government credit for acting to get more housing built – and identifies what should happen now.

#auspol #nswpol

grattan.edu.au/news/sydney-...
Sydney remains ground zero for Australia’s housing crisis - Grattan Institute
The NSW government deserves credit for taking steps to get more housing built. Here’s what it should do next.
grattan.edu.au
petertulip.bsky.social
"Australia’s five most powerful property people in 2025."
www.afr.com/property/com...
petertulip.bsky.social
I discuss housing on @joshzepps's “Uncomfortable Conversations”.
First hour is free on most podcast platforms.
Second hour (tbh, less provocative) requires inexpensive subscription.

uncomfortableconversations.substack.com/p/has-home-o...
"Has Home Ownership Become Hereditary?" with Peter Tulip
Why is housing in Australia so unaffordable, and what can be done about it?
uncomfortableconversations.substack.com
Reposted by Peter Tulip
jonobri.com
It is fantastic to see Clare O’Neil and the Federal Government increasingly on-message about the housing crisis.

The Minns and Allen governments are undertaking some of the most meaningful and ambitious housing reforms in decades. Federal Government backing is crucial— 🧵
petertulip.bsky.social
A good thread by author @jensvb.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/jens... 3/3
jensvb.bsky.social
Happy that the paper by @tomdavidoff.bsky.social @lausterna.bsky.social Tsur Somerville and I on the outcomes of the multiplex upzonings in Kelowna and Coquitlam is out. While the two zoning reforms look similar on paper, we detail how their real world outcomes differ. doi.org/10.1016/j.jh...
Upzoning and redevelopment: The details matter

Facing worsening housing affordability, policymakers in a growing number of jurisdictions have heeded
economists’ calls for increases in supply through relaxing land use restrictions, particularly on maximum
allowed density and increases in the number of units allowed on a single lot. While floor space or floor area
ratios (FSR or FAR) and unit count per lot are indicators of the potential for density, local governments have
many levers to control the volume, type, and pace of new construction. In this paper, we compare changes in
land prices and the pace of redevelopment following two similar, moderate density upzonings (up to four units
per lot) of single family neighborhoods in the province of British Columbia (Canada). The upzoning in the City
of Kelowna resulted in considerable new construction of higher density residential units as well as a significant
increase in lot prices in the upzoned area relative to nearby areas with status quo zoning. In contrast, though
the changes in allowed density were nearly identical, in Coquitlam there has been minimal uptake of new
multiplex options and no discernible land lift in response to upzoning. We highlight the importance of other
regulatory levers that are easy for analysts to miss in contributing to these different outcomes. The Kelowna
upzoning was matched with an expedited development permit process for as-of-right fourplexes. In contrast,
the Coquitlam rezoning did not alter the city’s lengthy development permit process required to build beyond
the baseline duplex. Kelowna’s upzoning also required less parking than Coquitlam’s. An assessment of the
regulatory environment relying on the presence of the upzoning alone would miss the alteration to process (or
absence thereof) that appear to have had a significant effect across the two municipalities in whether zoning
changes led to actual new construction.
petertulip.bsky.social
The effect of allowing medium density in Kelowna, relative to nearby neighbourhoods that did not upzone: 2/3
petertulip.bsky.social
Two upzonings in British Columbia.
Kelowna delivered a big increase in construction but Coquitlam did not.
Because Coquitlam also imposed red tape, parking requirements, etc.
A reason for setting targets for completions, not theoretical "capacity".
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... 1/3
Reposted by Peter Tulip
jonobri.com
Today we @yimby.melbourne drop our new research note, demonstrating the bias of opt-in community consultation.

It will shock no one who’s paying attention, but our sample of 15 consults across six councils found a massive overrepresentation of homeowners and older folk.
petertulip.bsky.social
"Such damaging effect" ????
That is ignorant and misleading.
Several good researchers, using different approaches, find that tax concessions have only a tiny positive effect on housing prices, while reducing rents.
petertulip.bsky.social
Several good researchers, using different approaches, find that tax concessions have a tiny positive effect on housing prices, while reducing rents.
petertulip.bsky.social
How do we get an evidence-based discussion of housing policy?
We make two steps forward (Minns’ and Bishop’s great speeches this week).
Then @chriswallace.bsky.social publishes this muck, contradicted by the available research.
www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/comment/topi...