Peter Whiteford
@peterwhiteford.bsky.social
1.1K followers 1.1K following 88 posts
Interested in most aspects of social policy in Australia & internationally (also certain literary genres and restricted musical choices); also history (art too) ANU, Canberra crawford.anu.edu.au/crawford_peopl…
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Peter Whiteford
mklapdor.bsky.social
Draft program for the Senate Community Affairs Committee public hearing on the Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2025 tomorrow from 9am - www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentar...
In Canberra but will be streamed: www.aph.gov.au/News_and_Eve...
Screenshot of the public hearing program
Reposted by Peter Whiteford
patrickdunleavy.bsky.social
And if you’d like the whole ebook (or any of the 27 chapters) completely free, it’s always just a one-click download from @LSEPress here press.lse.ac.uk/books/e/10.3...
Reposted by Peter Whiteford
patrickdunleavy.bsky.social
Happy to say that the paperback book edition of “Australia’s Evolving Democracy” can be purchased for less than £11 from Amazon UK. Great value for 600 pages. www.amazon.co.uk/Australias-E...
peterwhiteford.bsky.social
Does Australia rely too much on taxes on incomes?
New OECD report shows Australia has the fourth lowest share of revenue from income taxes and social security contributions in the OECD in 2022.
peterwhiteford.bsky.social
Rising health expenditures and population ageing prompted OECD governments to increase social security contributions in 2024, reflecting a broader trend towards increasing revenues to strengthen the long-term sustainability of social protection systems. www.oecd.org/en/publicati...
Tax Policy Reforms 2025
This is the tenth edition of Tax Policy Reforms: OECD and Selected Partner Economies, an annual publication that provides comparative information on tax reforms across countries and tracks tax policy ...
www.oecd.org
Reposted by Peter Whiteford
Reposted by Peter Whiteford
Reposted by Peter Whiteford
luke-buckmaster.bsky.social
Brand new publication type from the Parliamentary Library - Policy Brief. Here's the first batch: www.aph.gov.au/About_Parlia...
Research
Research
www.aph.gov.au
Reposted by Peter Whiteford
Reposted by Peter Whiteford
mklapdor.bsky.social
Importantly, the Fed Court rejected the AAT's interpretation of when income is first 'earned'. The AAT's interpretation overturned how DSS/Centrelink had assessed earnings for decades and would have created a lot of issues for calculating pre-December 2020 debts
Screenshot of Fed Court decision para 172: 
'172    The Tribunal erred in law in concluding that all of Mr Chaplin’s income was earned on Sundays when, according to the Tribunal, a legal entitlement to the week’s income first arose. It thereby misdirected itself and reached a conclusion which was not open on the facts. Whilst it depends on the terms of the relevant contract (and any other instrument or law affecting the terms of employment), generally casual employees earn wages as the service for which they are entitled to be paid is provided. Contracts for casual employment usually provide for service by the hour, shift or day, and so casual employees usually earn income by the hour, shift or day upon the rendering of that service. Wages are not “earned” only when a legally enforceable right to payment arises on the express or implied terms of the contract.'
Reposted by Peter Whiteford
mklapdor.bsky.social
Federal Court decision in Chaplin v DSS Secretary (test case relating to method used to recalculate unlawful income apportionment debts) - accepts DSS' preferred method for assessing income where there is insufficient info on when the income was earned. www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Ju...
Chaplin v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2025] FCAFC 89
www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au
peterwhiteford.bsky.social
This appears to be actually legal - but is it good public policy to pursue debts based on calculations in a system that was so complex that the administration got it wrong.