@philipgrace.bsky.social
You encourage this belief that America is “the greatest”, when it’s far from it. In reality, (as shown by how much you spend on weaponry), you’re just the biggest warmongers.
January 5, 2026 at 5:35 PM
You encourage this belief that America is “the greatest”, when it’s far from it. In reality, (as shown by how much you spend on weaponry), you’re just the biggest warmongers.
He might have that much money, but as a human, in fact he’s worthless.
December 17, 2025 at 2:21 PM
He might have that much money, but as a human, in fact he’s worthless.
I can’t remember another instance where this happened on a straight not a corner, other than off the start line. Pretty blatant swerving by Tsunoda.
December 7, 2025 at 8:08 PM
I can’t remember another instance where this happened on a straight not a corner, other than off the start line. Pretty blatant swerving by Tsunoda.
I think the argument goes that he didn’t go off track to overtake, as you might in a corner, he had to swerve left to avoid crashing into Tsunoda, who left him no racing room. Had the Red Bull not forced him off track he would overtaken anyway.
December 7, 2025 at 7:42 PM
I think the argument goes that he didn’t go off track to overtake, as you might in a corner, he had to swerve left to avoid crashing into Tsunoda, who left him no racing room. Had the Red Bull not forced him off track he would overtaken anyway.
I like that they don’t actual present it to him. He had to reach and get it himself, like the grubby little orange turd he is.
December 6, 2025 at 12:24 AM
I like that they don’t actual present it to him. He had to reach and get it himself, like the grubby little orange turd he is.
I mean, it seems like a classic case of being promoted out of your most effective role, but we’ll see I guess.
November 26, 2025 at 6:16 PM
I mean, it seems like a classic case of being promoted out of your most effective role, but we’ll see I guess.
They might as well, the story ends in jail for them.
November 23, 2025 at 6:02 PM
They might as well, the story ends in jail for them.
That’s not a fact, it’s your opinion.
The reality is, it’s a popularity contest with a side dish of “what do you stand for ?”.
Dem candidate needs to be, above all, charismatic and presentable. AOC and Newsom both fit the bill.
The reality is, it’s a popularity contest with a side dish of “what do you stand for ?”.
Dem candidate needs to be, above all, charismatic and presentable. AOC and Newsom both fit the bill.
November 17, 2025 at 11:38 AM
That’s not a fact, it’s your opinion.
The reality is, it’s a popularity contest with a side dish of “what do you stand for ?”.
Dem candidate needs to be, above all, charismatic and presentable. AOC and Newsom both fit the bill.
The reality is, it’s a popularity contest with a side dish of “what do you stand for ?”.
Dem candidate needs to be, above all, charismatic and presentable. AOC and Newsom both fit the bill.
I’m also now consider myself far too cool for children’s fantasy tv.
November 7, 2025 at 6:36 PM
I’m also now consider myself far too cool for children’s fantasy tv.
But, but … weren’t Reform supposed to be different ?
November 6, 2025 at 6:10 PM
But, but … weren’t Reform supposed to be different ?
We all want it to be impartial, we just differ in that I think that mostly it treads a very difficult and very fine line - and inevitably sometimes it gets it wrong.
There’s a world of difference between an organisation trying vs one actively pushing a narrative.
There’s a world of difference between an organisation trying vs one actively pushing a narrative.
November 4, 2025 at 5:05 PM
We all want it to be impartial, we just differ in that I think that mostly it treads a very difficult and very fine line - and inevitably sometimes it gets it wrong.
There’s a world of difference between an organisation trying vs one actively pushing a narrative.
There’s a world of difference between an organisation trying vs one actively pushing a narrative.
So unrealistic - no way this prick says “thanks”.
November 4, 2025 at 3:25 PM
So unrealistic - no way this prick says “thanks”.
If you don’t have the BBC you’ll just have things like GBBews (or worse) and you’ll pine for the days when complaints could be made and retractions and corrections issued.
November 4, 2025 at 8:54 AM
If you don’t have the BBC you’ll just have things like GBBews (or worse) and you’ll pine for the days when complaints could be made and retractions and corrections issued.
I’m sure people living in Liverpool, or Birmingham or Manchester feel the same. Do you track their grievances or just your own ?
Things get ommited, humans get things wrong sometimes. It doesn’t mean there’s a bias.
Things get ommited, humans get things wrong sometimes. It doesn’t mean there’s a bias.
November 4, 2025 at 8:53 AM
I’m sure people living in Liverpool, or Birmingham or Manchester feel the same. Do you track their grievances or just your own ?
Things get ommited, humans get things wrong sometimes. It doesn’t mean there’s a bias.
Things get ommited, humans get things wrong sometimes. It doesn’t mean there’s a bias.
I’m asking you. I’m trying to get a feel for what you consider “impartial”.
This isn’t a “general” website, it has a very particular focus, almost by definition it’s not impartial.
This isn’t a “general” website, it has a very particular focus, almost by definition it’s not impartial.
November 3, 2025 at 9:46 PM
I’m asking you. I’m trying to get a feel for what you consider “impartial”.
This isn’t a “general” website, it has a very particular focus, almost by definition it’s not impartial.
This isn’t a “general” website, it has a very particular focus, almost by definition it’s not impartial.
Do you consider this to be an impartial source of news ?
November 3, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Do you consider this to be an impartial source of news ?
You keep saying that but are unable to give examples, back up your points or even say where you’re getting your data from. It just comes across as opinion.
November 3, 2025 at 9:12 PM
You keep saying that but are unable to give examples, back up your points or even say where you’re getting your data from. It just comes across as opinion.
Fair enough, and thankfully British.
The BBC does a great job, and I’m sure than sooner or later people sharing your opinion will get their way, and then like Brexit we’ll realise what an almighty mistake we’ve made.
The BBC does a great job, and I’m sure than sooner or later people sharing your opinion will get their way, and then like Brexit we’ll realise what an almighty mistake we’ve made.
November 3, 2025 at 8:54 PM
Fair enough, and thankfully British.
The BBC does a great job, and I’m sure than sooner or later people sharing your opinion will get their way, and then like Brexit we’ll realise what an almighty mistake we’ve made.
The BBC does a great job, and I’m sure than sooner or later people sharing your opinion will get their way, and then like Brexit we’ll realise what an almighty mistake we’ve made.
I agree of course, but this is more nuanced than simply “it used to be better”. We now have 24 hour news not just 25 minutes at 9 o’clock, and that time has to be filled… enter discussion and opinion.
And still the BBC is the gold standard that most news channels get nowhere near in impartiality.
And still the BBC is the gold standard that most news channels get nowhere near in impartiality.
November 3, 2025 at 8:51 PM
I agree of course, but this is more nuanced than simply “it used to be better”. We now have 24 hour news not just 25 minutes at 9 o’clock, and that time has to be filled… enter discussion and opinion.
And still the BBC is the gold standard that most news channels get nowhere near in impartiality.
And still the BBC is the gold standard that most news channels get nowhere near in impartiality.
Is there some reason that you think I’m not British ?
November 3, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Is there some reason that you think I’m not British ?
How do you know that corrections data ?
Also, as an aside, what’s wrong with making corrections ? That strikes me as the correct behaviour. Do you think Fox News makes corrections ?
Also, as an aside, what’s wrong with making corrections ? That strikes me as the correct behaviour. Do you think Fox News makes corrections ?
November 3, 2025 at 8:07 PM
How do you know that corrections data ?
Also, as an aside, what’s wrong with making corrections ? That strikes me as the correct behaviour. Do you think Fox News makes corrections ?
Also, as an aside, what’s wrong with making corrections ? That strikes me as the correct behaviour. Do you think Fox News makes corrections ?
Care to cite at least one of those studies?
The irony is that people from all sides of the political spectrum often complain that the BBC is not impartial. What they actually usually mean is that they “don’t exclusively support my view”.
The irony is that people from all sides of the political spectrum often complain that the BBC is not impartial. What they actually usually mean is that they “don’t exclusively support my view”.
exclusively.support
November 3, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Care to cite at least one of those studies?
The irony is that people from all sides of the political spectrum often complain that the BBC is not impartial. What they actually usually mean is that they “don’t exclusively support my view”.
The irony is that people from all sides of the political spectrum often complain that the BBC is not impartial. What they actually usually mean is that they “don’t exclusively support my view”.