Well in that case….

/sarcasm

‘Law enforcement should get to murder people instead of putting up with stuff’ is a position Trump shares with his deplorable supporters.

#bootlickers

On the upside, nobody is likely to change habits based on the new food pyramid. Either you love that the government is now validating your preferences, or you don't trust a government that lies about nearly everything.

"Physically confident" 😂

The argument is 'why should women cede this, yet another place,' and that's seems reasonable, but if women are clenching their keys walking to a car, and covering their drinks in bars, than, it seems, those should be higher priority than a web site. Maybe don't cede those places and fuck X.

Actually more surprised that small government, government should get out of lives, government must be canceled, DOGE folks would be so interested in managing the details of a free market.

Murderous keystone cops.

A really horrible point to make is to answer "why did she speed away?" Well, after being fatally shot point blank, her foot came down on the accelerator.

The thug/federal agent made it MORE dangerous for himself and colleagues (in addition to murdering a citizen).

Could, *and did* easily get out of the way. He'd have been a less risk if he hadn't taken the time to unholster his gun and shoot to kill an American citizen.

Thank you for this! Here's my question: the person determining if you are arrested (not convicted!) is an untrained, possibly unhinged federal agent.

So, to stand up to these thugs, I thin we have to risk jail, if not conviction, right?

Well, not the only country to allow mail in voting, actually.
www.newsweek.com/map-shows-co...

Trump is, shocker, lying.

Everyone around him, and messaging he receives tells him he's in the right.

And worse, this brave citizen may well get arrested. Not convicted, mind you, it's clearly not illegal to observe people from a safe distance, but that's some serious, chilling, inconvenience!

Concise and insightful. Thank you.

I didn't see a foreign invasion in that video, though.

I, personally, would not grace this disingenuous journalist with a response.