Texas Doyle
@pigman59.bsky.social
Don’t worry the refs saved them
December 22, 2025 at 1:02 AM
Don’t worry the refs saved them
1. Fellowship
2. The scene where Merry and Pippen take Isengard with the ents and find Saruman’s weed stash.
2. The scene where Merry and Pippen take Isengard with the ents and find Saruman’s weed stash.
December 12, 2025 at 5:51 AM
1. Fellowship
2. The scene where Merry and Pippen take Isengard with the ents and find Saruman’s weed stash.
2. The scene where Merry and Pippen take Isengard with the ents and find Saruman’s weed stash.
Great day for them to lose
October 4, 2025 at 1:24 PM
Great day for them to lose
I think framing it as “exploiting a flaw in the rules” is wrong.
Catcher framing is clearly important to the art of catching, and fallible humans calling balls/strikes is a feature (not a bug) of the game. It will remain that way after the challenge system is implemented (obviously less so tho).
Catcher framing is clearly important to the art of catching, and fallible humans calling balls/strikes is a feature (not a bug) of the game. It will remain that way after the challenge system is implemented (obviously less so tho).
August 20, 2025 at 10:48 PM
I think framing it as “exploiting a flaw in the rules” is wrong.
Catcher framing is clearly important to the art of catching, and fallible humans calling balls/strikes is a feature (not a bug) of the game. It will remain that way after the challenge system is implemented (obviously less so tho).
Catcher framing is clearly important to the art of catching, and fallible humans calling balls/strikes is a feature (not a bug) of the game. It will remain that way after the challenge system is implemented (obviously less so tho).
Trade deadline was yesterday - how is this allowed
August 1, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Trade deadline was yesterday - how is this allowed
He reached for the tag!
July 19, 2025 at 3:49 AM
He reached for the tag!
“in a cheerful bar i think everyone here would get along” is perfect. Thank you
July 12, 2025 at 4:46 AM
“in a cheerful bar i think everyone here would get along” is perfect. Thank you
Yeah yeah yeah “full season stats are generally more predictive than partial season stats” etc. etc.
I think you’ve convinced me but in the psyche of us Tigers fans, Riley is a more important player. Nick was only briefly the best position player on the team, Riley feels like our future.
I think you’ve convinced me but in the psyche of us Tigers fans, Riley is a more important player. Nick was only briefly the best position player on the team, Riley feels like our future.
July 9, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Yeah yeah yeah “full season stats are generally more predictive than partial season stats” etc. etc.
I think you’ve convinced me but in the psyche of us Tigers fans, Riley is a more important player. Nick was only briefly the best position player on the team, Riley feels like our future.
I think you’ve convinced me but in the psyche of us Tigers fans, Riley is a more important player. Nick was only briefly the best position player on the team, Riley feels like our future.
The acid Tigers fucking rock
July 9, 2025 at 8:09 PM
The acid Tigers fucking rock
Sure—but I think Riley is a tier better. He has a .371 WOBA this season at age 24. He’s on pace for 40 homers and still growing into his power. Castellanos posted above a .371 WOBA once in his career, in 2021, while playing in the Great American Small Park.
July 9, 2025 at 11:50 AM
Sure—but I think Riley is a tier better. He has a .371 WOBA this season at age 24. He’s on pace for 40 homers and still growing into his power. Castellanos posted above a .371 WOBA once in his career, in 2021, while playing in the Great American Small Park.
Coming back here to share this. I think you have to evaluate the quality of contact with this in mind. He has a weird, unique swing/approach.
blogs.fangraphs.com/riley-greene...
blogs.fangraphs.com/riley-greene...
Riley Greene Is Luis Arraez’s Wario
Greene is in the 97th percentile in barrel rate and the first percentile in squared-up rate.
blogs.fangraphs.com
July 9, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Coming back here to share this. I think you have to evaluate the quality of contact with this in mind. He has a weird, unique swing/approach.
blogs.fangraphs.com/riley-greene...
blogs.fangraphs.com/riley-greene...
You missed the part where the Bush administration failed to take any climate action and destroyed the Kyoto protocol, which has inevitably led us here. Can’t believe you’re such a shill for the Bush administration. If you’re going g to talk about it, be honest. Silence is complicity.
July 6, 2025 at 7:54 PM
You missed the part where the Bush administration failed to take any climate action and destroyed the Kyoto protocol, which has inevitably led us here. Can’t believe you’re such a shill for the Bush administration. If you’re going g to talk about it, be honest. Silence is complicity.
Says more about those posting those replies than it does your take
June 30, 2025 at 2:28 AM
Says more about those posting those replies than it does your take
Sure—if you assume commercial stores are operating on accurate information and not on a faulty, overly risk averse basis. I’m not sure that I agree with that assumption.
June 26, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Sure—if you assume commercial stores are operating on accurate information and not on a faulty, overly risk averse basis. I’m not sure that I agree with that assumption.
The other problem they will help solve for though is food deserts. I’m more optimistic about that.
June 26, 2025 at 10:21 PM
The other problem they will help solve for though is food deserts. I’m more optimistic about that.
Sure—but 1-3% cheaper is still cheaper. I’m not bullish on these publicly run stores, but a pilot project is worth a shot.
June 26, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Sure—but 1-3% cheaper is still cheaper. I’m not bullish on these publicly run stores, but a pilot project is worth a shot.
No profit margin required
June 26, 2025 at 9:18 PM
No profit margin required
Midwesterner here— this goes too far west.
June 25, 2025 at 7:41 PM
Midwesterner here— this goes too far west.
I think you should just pick one. Using both would feel odd as a reader, without your explanation. Plus, I think most baseball fans understand these stats at least vaguely.
June 24, 2025 at 1:47 AM
I think you should just pick one. Using both would feel odd as a reader, without your explanation. Plus, I think most baseball fans understand these stats at least vaguely.
