Pax (nee Patrick) Crowley (they/them, þ/þs)
banner
pilcrow5.bsky.social
Pax (nee Patrick) Crowley (they/them, þ/þs)
@pilcrow5.bsky.social
Rare Books Librarian, Classic Doctor Who nerd, Forever DM, synth dabbler, low-level crafter, gardener, likes to cook, prefers being barefoot -- In other words, a very tall Hobbit?

All posts personal. No posts represent the opinions or will of my employer.
onesearch.wesleyan.edu
September 10, 2025 at 8:48 PM
So it's a bit too tight to really get in there and see it. But it also means that one could also solve this by assuming a conjugate flyleaf that didn't survive the rebind. But that in itself seems like an unlikely (and untidy) way to sign anyway. Anyway, good enough for now. On to other pastures.
September 10, 2025 at 8:34 PM
that the fifth leaf is an unsigned singleton--a presumed chi. This seems most likely to me. The weirdness is that the catchword on [paragraph]4v correctly predicts the heading of this posited chi1r, which seems kind of odd for an insertion. It is in a modern binding. [3/4]
September 10, 2025 at 8:34 PM
And it's got a funny little mystery with its first leaves too. It's a quarto, but the initial gathering is 5 leaves. I can't quite tell if there's a singleton in there or if there's an excised leaf. The title page is unsigned, but the next leaf is signed [paragraph]2. So that might mean... [2/4]
September 10, 2025 at 8:34 PM
What a cutie!
January 30, 2025 at 8:44 PM