Sean Raymond (planetplanet.net)
@planetplanet.bsky.social
520 followers 94 following 88 posts
Building crazy planetary systems on my blog planetplanet.net. Solar System formation. Exoplanets. Free-floating planets and interstellar objects. Astronomy poem book: http://amzn.to/3muytqo He/him.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
planetplanet.bsky.social
Like dinosaurs, Saturn and Jupiter roamed
They sculpted this system that humans call home

The gas giants roared, the system unstable
An ice giant planet fell right off the table!
A whole ring of comets was launched to the stars
The planets — bombarded — still bear the scars.
Reposted by Sean Raymond (planetplanet.net)
aas.org
AAS members are on the Hill today to #SaveNASAScience and advocate for sustained funding for NASA, NSF, and our nation's other science agencies! Help us amplify their voices by calling and writing to your Congressional offices today: aas.org/action-alert...
planetplanet.bsky.social
See for example this paper : ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ....
Tidal Limits to Planetary Habitability
The habitable zones (HZs) of main-sequence stars have traditionally been defined as the range of orbits that intercept the appropriate amount of stellar flux to permit surface water on a planet. Terrestrial exoplanets discovered to orbit M stars in these zones, which are close-in due to decreased stellar luminosity, may also undergo significant tidal heating. Tidal heating may span a wide range for terrestrial exoplanets and may significantly affect conditions near the surface. For example, if heating rates on an exoplanet are near or greater than that on Io (where tides drive volcanism that resurfaces the planet at least every 1 Myr) and produce similar surface conditions, then the development of life seems unlikely. On the other hand, if the tidal heating rate is less than the minimum to initiate plate tectonics, then CO<SUB>2</SUB> may not be recycled through subduction, leading to a runaway greenhouse that sterilizes the planet. These two cases represent potential boundaries to habitability and are presented along with the range of the traditional HZ for main-sequence, low-mass stars. We propose a revised HZ that incorporates both stellar insolation and tidal heating. We apply these criteria to GJ 581 d and find that it is in the traditional HZ, but its tidal heating alone may be insufficient for plate tectonics.
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu
planetplanet.bsky.social
Thanks!

If there was a very large amount of internal heat flux from tidal dissipation, it would likely be bad for habitability if the planet is close to the inner edge of the habitable zone, or good if it's beyond (colder).

The planet's orbit would also change (slowly) due to tidal dissipation.
planetplanet.bsky.social
In my new @nautil.us article, I use a lot of recent research to argue that rocky exoplanets on eccentric orbits are often very good candidates for life.

(At least, eccentric/inclined orbits should not be used as a negative for habitability)

nautil.us/wild-orbits-...
Wild Orbits Prime Planets for Life
Looking for habitable worlds? Check the ones with extreme swings.
nautil.us
planetplanet.bsky.social
It would be interesting to see what the mass ratio threshold is for stability -- does it have to be 1.000000 or could it be 1.01, 1.1, 2., ...?
planetplanet.bsky.social
Here's something new and weird -- eccentric rings of co-orbital planets.

They are stable indefinitely, from an orbital point of view.

Could they actually form and exist?

planetplanet.net/2025/09/02/e...
planetplanet.bsky.social
Flashback to 2012 when I ate the Sun

(Photo from the top of Vulcano in Sicily)
Reposted by Sean Raymond (planetplanet.net)
dorothyjberry.bsky.social
Imagine the complicated and precious genius of the girl who made this embroidery sampler in 1811

The Solar System, sampler, unknown maker, 1811, England. Museum no. T.92-1939. Victoria and Albert Museum, London.
a 19th century embroidery sampler showing the solar system, the distance of the planets from the sun, and the length of time it takes each planet to circle the sun
Reposted by Sean Raymond (planetplanet.net)
astrowright.bsky.social
Still can't get over @deschscoveries.bsky.social parodying Loeb, and Loeb straight-up playing out the parody a 3 days later.

Is Desch a clairvoyant, or did Loeb read this mockery of him and think—hey, that's actually a great idea!—and just plagiarize him?!
Next comes a by-now routine dismissal of astronomical observations, in order to claim 3I/ATLAS’s dusty coma (which does exist: de la Fuente Marcos et al.; Seligman et al.; Bolin et al.) does not exist and is just photographic fuzz. What would be bold and novel would be to lean in to the observations of dust and assert that any spaceship coming in hot from the interstellar medium would be very dirty and in need of a wash. Impacts by interstellar dust particles and interstellar gas particles can easily create a thin layer of dust on the surface of 3I/ATLAS, with no accompanying ices if 3I/ATLAS is not a comet. The interstellar speed of 3I/ATLAS is ~60 kilometers per second relative to the local interstellar medium. Any impacting matter would deliver ten times more energy per impacting proton than required to break a single chemical bond within the solid surface. The microscopic breakup of the surface to super-micron fragments by interstellar impactors, such as dust, gas and cosmic-ray particles, might have led over billions of years to the formation of large dust particles that are released close to the Sun and account for the glow ahead of 3I/ATLAS in its Hubble image.
Reposted by Sean Raymond (planetplanet.net)
planetplanet.bsky.social
Me neither -- it's really tricky to understand why our results are different. Either taking the Moon quadrupole into account is critical, or sampling different possible configurations for the flyby is essential.
Reposted by Sean Raymond (planetplanet.net)
caseydreier.bsky.social
Today, *every* living prior leader of NASA's science directorate have released a joint letter condemning the proposed cuts to NASA science. These individuals every administration from Reagan to Biden, and all believe these cuts are insanely destructive: www.planetary.org/press-releas...
Every living NASA science chief unites in opposition to unprecedented…
The entire past leadership of NASA’s science activities have released a joint statement condemning the proposed 47% cuts proposed to the agency’s science…
www.planetary.org
Reposted by Sean Raymond (planetplanet.net)
grumpykelson.myatproto.social
Folks need to remember that public funding of science drives economic growth and human quality of life decades into the future.

This is about more than saving jobs on the line now. It's about your future health, and the future of health and well-being for the next several generations.
emexastris.bsky.social
Are you from one of these states? Then we need your help to save American science!

The Senate Appropriations Committee will be marking up the President's Budget Request for science on Wednesday. People have been saying the proposed cuts "decimated" US science, but that's wrong: they are apocalyptic
A map of the US with the states the republican senators are from marked in red and states the democratic senators are from marked in blue:
Senator Susan Collins (Republican - Maine)
Senator Mitch McConnell(Republican - Kentucky)
Senator Lisa Murkowski(Republican - Alaska)
Senator Lindsey Graham(Republican - South Carolina)
Senator Jerry Moran(Republican - Kansas)
Senator John Hoeven(Republican - North Dakota)
Senator John Boozman(Republican - Arkansas)
Senator Shelley Moore Capito(Republican - West Virginia)
Senator John Kennedy(Republican - Louisiana)
Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith(Republican - Mississippi)
Senator Bill Hagerty(Republican - Tennessee)
Senator Katie Britt(Republican - Alabama)
Senator Markwayne Mullin(Republican - Oklahoma)
Senator Deb Fischer(Republican - Nebraska)
Senator Mike Rounds(Republican - South Dakota)
Patty Murray(Democrat - Washington)
Richard Durbin(Democrat - Illinois)
Jack Reed(Democrat - Rhode Island)
Jeanne Shaheen(Democrat - New Hampshire)
Jeff Merkley(Democrat - Oregon)
Christopher Coons(Democrat - Delaware)
Brian Schatz(Democrat - Hawaii)
Tammy Baldwin(Democrat - Wisconsin)
Chris Murphy(Democrat - Connecticut)
Chris Van Hollen(Democrat - Maryland)
Martin Heinrich(Democrat - New Mexico)
Gary Peters(Democrat - Michigan)
Kirsten Gillibrand(Democrat - New York)
Jon Ossoff(Democrat - Georgia)
planetplanet.bsky.social
I suppose I should add that there is a lot more to know about the giant planet instability. I captured some of that in this blog post

planetplanet.net/2022/06/30/t...
The giant planet instability (the “Nice model”) – planetplanet
planetplanet.net
Reposted by Sean Raymond (planetplanet.net)
coreyspowell.bsky.social
The details are not yet finalized, but the budget bill would devastate NASA science and the future of US exploration in space and astronomy. Among many other things. 🔭🧪

www.planetary.org/articles/nas...
NASA science budget over time Planned NASA mission cancelations
planetplanet.bsky.social
Awesomel! I hadn't seen your article -- much appreciated!
planetplanet.bsky.social
@nytimes.com article about Nate Kaib's and my recent paper on the future stability of the Solar System when passing stars are accounted for.

www.nytimes.com/2025/06/28/s...
This Is Not the Way We Usually Imagine the World Will End
www.nytimes.com
planetplanet.bsky.social
Like dinosaurs, Saturn and Jupiter roamed
They sculpted this system that humans call home

The gas giants roared, the system unstable
An ice giant planet fell right off the table!
A whole ring of comets was launched to the stars
The planets — bombarded — still bear the scars.