Johan Renaudie
@plannapus.bsky.social
250 followers 590 following 27 posts
Micropaleontologist. #Radiolaria 🔬🌊🦠
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Johan Renaudie
ecoevorxiv.bsky.social
Fossils for Future: the billion-dollar case for paleontology’s digital infrastructure
DOI: doi.org/10.32942/X2D...
Reposted by Johan Renaudie
paleosynth.bsky.social
BioDeeptime has made it into Science! "Climate is changing fast—and forests are 200 years behind". A sweeping new analysis of ancient pollen and modern data reveals this dramatic lag—and its consequences."(from ScienceDaily) - article: DOI: 10.1126/science.adr6700 CONGRATULATIONS to the authors.
plannapus.bsky.social
Indeed it seems to work again. I hadnt been able to reach anything since a couple of days.
plannapus.bsky.social
Is it just for me or are all the IODP Proceedings currently unreachable? I'm getting Error 403 on all of them and the individual DOIs lead to Error: DOI not found.
plannapus.bsky.social
sorry i meant setdiff(tree$tip.label, rownames(Ages))
plannapus.bsky.social
You would need to check setdiff(names(tree$tip.label),rownames(Ages)) in order to compare properly instead of just names(tree). tree is a list object that contain the names of the tips, the shapes of the edges, and potentially many more items.
plannapus.bsky.social
OK :) So yes 15% seems high indeed.
plannapus.bsky.social
Are you looking for a specific taxonomic group?
plannapus.bsky.social
So given most taxonomists started publishing names before 2011 and in journal with physical copies, they might not even be aware of the existence of zoobank, and/or don't see the point of entering name (i. e. doing extra work) in it if they don't have to. That would be my guess. 2/2
plannapus.bsky.social
Since 2011, the code of zoological nomenclature was amended to say that new names have to be entered in zoobank, IF they are published in an online-only journal. 1/2
plannapus.bsky.social
I also have an account on Mastodon. I like it personally but only the few people I followed who were tech-oriented made the jump, perhaps unsurprisingly.
plannapus.bsky.social
I deleted my account two months ago.
plannapus.bsky.social
[...] my former institution in Germany and most of the people working there also did not make the jump, and (most damaging for me) i am also missing all the regional news/politicians from the region i am from in Southern France. 2/2
plannapus.bsky.social
While most of the twitter folks that I followed from english-speaking countries (and to some extent from South America) made it here, I am still missing the others: namely my Japanese colleagues (which were making the bulk of Micropaleontology Twitter) are not here yet, [...] 1/2
Reposted by Johan Renaudie
burnsajohn.bsky.social
A bunch of cells of the nasselarian radiolarian Plagiacantha arachnoides--like a group of little spiders! Plus a couple of bonus acantharians. From the gulf of maine #protistaday #protistsonsky #marinelife
A group of radiolarians isolated from a plankton tow.
plannapus.bsky.social
Certainly sturdier than Woodhenge and Hayhenge at least.
Reposted by Johan Renaudie
Reposted by Johan Renaudie
burnsajohn.bsky.social
"The death of an acantharian" Or: why we don't have fossil acantharian skeletons like we do for their glassy and chalky cousins. I think in this case it might somehow be an active process--acantharian skeletons from cells that swarm away last longer.
plannapus.bsky.social
Sarah, Dave and I just got a small piece published in PAGES Magazine on the legacy of IODP in term of evolutionary studies and conservation biology (with radiolarians as case study): doi.org/10.22498/pag...
Radiolaria as a study system for marine plankton in a changing climate | PAGES
doi.org
plannapus.bsky.social
Indeed my first guess would be some sort of pyloniid/tholoniid but i'm intrigued by what we see below in the middle of the specimen (are those arches? could it be some weird little nassellarian, like a trissocyclid). With additional pics showing different focal depths, it could clarify what it is.
plannapus.bsky.social
Do you happen to have pictures of other focal depths?