I would also: 'deportation camps' being used to convert immigrant labour into slave labour (because they will still need people to do the work)

It would be hard to come up with a better metaphor for the magical thinking of carbon offsetting

Is this "crimes against nature"? It looks like a good and important read

www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

Also that's not how you wear oxygen masks. Trying to make it look "fun".

If you put a cat into orbit it is called a catellite

Source plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant...

Yes - echoes of Kant (via Stanford):

We are to respect human beings simply because they are persons and this requires a certain sort of regard... And, crucially, persons cannot lose their humanity by their misdeeds – even the most vicious persons, deserve basic respect as persons with humanity.

Yes but what about my right to a distant vacation?

The view, the slow travel, the not killing the planet for all future generations... Beautiful

It's important to remember too that no one and no sector is exempt from this. Lamenting the climate crisis and fossil industry while pretending your own choices are irrelevant is far too common in the conservation and climate world.

Yes: fine to completely normalise futures where machines suck many 100s billions of tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere, but suggesting limits on the number of flights taken by wealthy hi-emitters or moving away from cars (including EVs) in built-up urban environments is considered beyond the pale.