aclintaminophen
@poindexterramone.bsky.social
Adequate guitarist. Sci-fi podcaster. Proficient bowlist. Sports degenerate. Second-rate man. Legal daddy. He/him.
My guess is that the Ducks wouldn’t allow the game to start at 9am.
October 11, 2025 at 5:59 PM
My guess is that the Ducks wouldn’t allow the game to start at 9am.
Reposted by aclintaminophen
2. She says Trump’s order is in “direct contravention” of her order yesterday and that it “appears to violate both [10 U.S.C. §] 12406 and the Tenth Amendment.”
October 6, 2025 at 3:23 AM
2. She says Trump’s order is in “direct contravention” of her order yesterday and that it “appears to violate both [10 U.S.C. §] 12406 and the Tenth Amendment.”
Reposted by aclintaminophen
BREAKING: "For all of the reasons" given in Saturday's TRO, Immergut grants plaintiffs' second motion for a TRO.
"Based on the conduct of the defendants, ... in direct contravention" of Saturday's TRO, the second TRO bars relocation or federalization of National Guard from "any state or D.C."
"Based on the conduct of the defendants, ... in direct contravention" of Saturday's TRO, the second TRO bars relocation or federalization of National Guard from "any state or D.C."
October 6, 2025 at 3:19 AM
BREAKING: "For all of the reasons" given in Saturday's TRO, Immergut grants plaintiffs' second motion for a TRO.
"Based on the conduct of the defendants, ... in direct contravention" of Saturday's TRO, the second TRO bars relocation or federalization of National Guard from "any state or D.C."
"Based on the conduct of the defendants, ... in direct contravention" of Saturday's TRO, the second TRO bars relocation or federalization of National Guard from "any state or D.C."
Reposted by aclintaminophen
Check out Justice Eddins’ complete repudiation of the Roberts Court here. It’s worth reading in full. It’s quite brave—and exceedingly rare—for a sitting judge to speak so candidly and scathingly about SCOTUS’ partisan contortions of law, history, and fact.
www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/u...
www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/u...
September 20, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Check out Justice Eddins’ complete repudiation of the Roberts Court here. It’s worth reading in full. It’s quite brave—and exceedingly rare—for a sitting judge to speak so candidly and scathingly about SCOTUS’ partisan contortions of law, history, and fact.
www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/u...
www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/u...