Prachee Avasthi
@pracheeac.bsky.social
5.3K followers 1.9K following 210 posts
Co-founder & CSO @ArcadiaScience. Head of Open Science @AsteraInstitute. Immigrant. she/her Still post frequently on X (@PracheeAC)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
pracheeac.bsky.social
Right now is the best chance the scientific community has ever had to end the artificial scarcity of academic journals.
1/
Reposted by Prachee Avasthi
pracheeac.bsky.social
Some scientists aren’t waiting for journals to catch up. They’re showing us what’s next.

The Beyond the Journal awards honor those breaking the mold in how science is shared.

More details: pracheeac.substack.com/p/off-roadin...

Nominate or self-nominate here: www.experiment.foundation/beyond
pracheeac.bsky.social
Some scientists aren’t waiting for journals to catch up. They’re showing us what’s next.

The Beyond the Journal awards honor those breaking the mold in how science is shared.

More details: pracheeac.substack.com/p/off-roadin...

Nominate or self-nominate here: www.experiment.foundation/beyond
pracheeac.bsky.social
Yes why would anyone at a frontier research lab know anything about this topic. I guess uninformed takes by people not working on anything related are usually more useful
pracheeac.bsky.social
A serious and useful thread with permission to take AGI seriously by @jascha.sohldickstein.com over at X

x.com/jaschasd/sta...
x.com
pracheeac.bsky.social
Sometimes I wonder if you have a spreadsheet with various of your threads/arguments for when you need to surface one of them every 2 days
pracheeac.bsky.social
Ordered a shirt that reminds me unambiguously of @richardsever.bsky.social 😂
Reposted by Prachee Avasthi
pracheeac.bsky.social
Right now is the best chance the scientific community has ever had to end the artificial scarcity of academic journals.
1/
pracheeac.bsky.social
Check out my new op-ed urging NIH to disallow taxpayer dollars towards journal publication fees — something both publishers and scientists have played a role in perpetuating.
2/
pracheeac.bsky.social
Right now is the best chance the scientific community has ever had to end the artificial scarcity of academic journals.
1/
pracheeac.bsky.social
Some other considerations that can help:
- technology continues to evolve to facilitate
- better authentication practices
- stronger metadata
- increased connectivity and improved reporting of research/data artifacts upon which papers are based
pracheeac.bsky.social
Yeah definitely it’s problematic but journals & their infinite predatory clones aren’t really solving it. All the more reason to double down on our own scientific judgment & practices than assuming we can trust anyone to tame the fire hose for us
pracheeac.bsky.social
This! Many people have expert opinions about their specific interest in a paper just from reading it that would be helpful. It needn’t be comprehensive to be exceptionally helpful, especially since people’s expertise can rarely cover the joint expertise of increasingly collaborative work anyway
pracheeac.bsky.social
There are a lot of reasons for that that I think need to be fixed to make the comments more discoverable to readers and authors alike
pracheeac.bsky.social
Sure this is important but there can be legit reasons for this too. Like the new version doesn’t even contain the part relevant to the critique. And luckily all those versions and associated relevant critiques are accessible
pracheeac.bsky.social
I don’t think it’s obvious and feel quite the opposite. Also they’re changing whether we ask for it or not. NIH has already said they’re capping fees. It’s better to be ready