Cambridge Core - Human Rights - Can Human Rights Survive?

The current scrutiny powers of Parliament over treaties and international agreements are weak and ineffective: legislating for parliamentary consent would be a step forward

What the supreme court has been asked to rule on – and the implications for women and trans people in Scotland, England and Wales

Presented by Ørsted By SUZANNE LYNCH with ZOYA SHEFTALOVICH PRESENTED BY Send tips here | Tweet @NicholasVinocur @swheaton @suzannelynch1 | Listen to Playbook and view in your browser GOOD MORNING …

Norwegian PM has argued that Brussels and Oslo need each other now more than ever.

The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill is currently being debated in the Lords itself, and has reached a crucial moment. In this second of a two-part post, Constitution Unit Director Meg Russell reviews the prospects for using the bill to achieve other long-awaited Lords reforms, beyond removing the hereditary peers. She argues that key changes, particularly to limit the size of the chamber, and improve the appointments process, should be made to the bill, as history suggests that further government legislation is unlikely to follow. These changes are in tune with public opinion, and would be consistent with promises made in Labour’s own manifesto.