Thibault Schrepel
@profschrepel.bsky.social
400 followers 130 following 330 posts
Associate Prof VU Amsterdam • Faculty Affiliate Stanford • Into Running 🏃🏻 #antitrust #AI #complexityscience #digitalmarkets #blockchain 📕 www.thibaultschrepel.com 📻 https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scalingtheory
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
profschrepel.bsky.social
My rule for interactions on BlueSky (and elsewhere) is simple: I always assume it’s my interlocutor’s birthday. This means my messages are sent with kindness and compassion.
Reposted by Thibault Schrepel
networklawreview.bsky.social
New Antitrust Antidote: Apple case moves ahead; per se tying theory on Hermès doesn’t fly; alleged algorithmic/benchmarking collusion suits stumble on pleadings... All you need to know about recent U.S. antitrust cases is here: www.networklawreview.org/antidote-7/
profschrepel.bsky.social
In this piece for Times Higher Education, I suggest a few simple experiments that any professor can run to see how GenAI impacts their own students. I hope this proves useful to some of you. www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/how-t...
Reposted by Thibault Schrepel
networklawreview.bsky.social
Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social’s monthly reading suggestions: DMA & EU users, killer acquisitions, auditable AI, AI Act political economy, GenAI & democracy, AI agents in econ, adaptive regulation + a special issue on law, tech & econ of AI: www.networklawreview.org/september-20...
profschrepel.bsky.social
www.nber.org/papers/w34194
Interesting one. Market power persistence isn’t about lax antitrust enforcement. It’s the technology + learning dynamics that give certain cohorts lasting dominance.
profschrepel.bsky.social
New essay out.

The AI Act multiplies review clauses, delegated acts, monitoring obligations. But it lacks true adaptive capacity. In complexity science terms, the EU has built “sensors without reflexes.”

I hope this resonates with colleagues working on AI governance.
networklawreview.bsky.social
The EU says its AI rules are “future proof.” They’re not, @profschrepel.bsky.social argues. Without adaptive regulation (modular rules, real-time monitoring, plural triggers, institutional memory) Brussels (and others!) will always be behind the curve. www.networklawreview.org/schrepel-fut...
profschrepel.bsky.social
In my op-ed for Les Échos, I explain why the myth of “future-proof” regulation is doomed to fail, and why it is urgent to establish distributed revision mechanisms and real-time supervision.
👉 Read the full piece: www.lesechos.fr/idees-debats...
www.lesechos.fr
profschrepel.bsky.social
NEW OP-ED. AI evolves every week. European regulations, every few years. The result: a widening gap between the speed of innovation and the slowness of legislation.
profschrepel.bsky.social
Let me say it as it is: the newly launched Amsterdam Center for Digital Competition has secured the best acronym I’ve seen for a center: ACDC. This is close to genius. I am delighted to have been invited to it to give a talk on #computationalantitrust later today. More to come!
profschrepel.bsky.social
NEW #computationalantitrust paper.
Using computational text analysis, Sean Norick Long (@georgetownlaw.bsky.social) shows how Lina Khan reshaped antitrust beyond consumer welfare toward workers, power, and a more moralized public debate.
Link: law.stanford.edu/codex-the-st...
profschrepel.bsky.social
For the first time, I recorded a solo episode of #ScalingTheory. I take a deep dive into adaptive regulation; why “future-proof” laws fall short, and how we can build rules that truly evolve with technology. I hope you'll enjoy the format.
profschrepel.bsky.social
New episode of the #computationalantitrust podcast. I talked with @nancyscola.bsky.social about the interplay between computational antitrust and antitrust reporting. Nancy had so many great insights. I very much enjoyed recording it, and I hope you'll enjoy listening to it.
profschrepel.bsky.social
Here is a summary of the #computationalantitrust event at the @oecd-ocde.bsky.social.

In a word: computational antitrust is here! At the OECD, agencies shared how they’re building tools, infrastructures & teams to enforce law with code. The frontier isn’t adoption, it’s integration!
profschrepel.bsky.social
3/3 — 2. Measurement. Performance can be tracked with incredible accuracy. Progress is observable, results aren’t relative, data gives you the unvarnished truth. It’s a profoundly humbling and fun experience.
In short: if you can, start running!
profschrepel.bsky.social
2/3 — 1. Independence. Your results don’t depend on anyone else. There are no tenure or grant committees, no peer reviewers, no external gatekeepers deciding whether your efforts are good enough or whether to award you something.
profschrepel.bsky.social
1/3 — I ran a 10-mile race this weekend in the middle of my Frankfurt marathon prep (in about 1h03, anticipating the question). It reminded me of two reasons (among many) why I love running so much as an academic:
Reposted by Thibault Schrepel
networklawreview.bsky.social
NEW article by Nuno Cunha Rodrigues, President of Portuguese Competition Authority.
He argues that AI disruption demands a new regulatory ecosystem where competition law works hand in hand with other public policies www.networklawreview.org/cunha-rodrig...
profschrepel.bsky.social
Heading to Paris (Université Paris II) to present my paper “Adaptive Regulation” for the first time (papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....) at a conference co-organized by the amazing Godefroy de Boiscuillé. The program (fondation.assas-universite.fr/fr/evenement...) looks outstanding. Join us.
profschrepel.bsky.social
On my way to Paris.
Cheers from windy Amsterdam.