Thank you.

The semantics — whether or not a particular post was visible or not at a particular point in time — I don’t care about.

I do appreciate you being unable to spell your own insults though.

The core of the argument is Bsky silently removing user data/posts, seemingly for personal reasons. If that were true, it would have been an outrageous breach of trust and fundamentally call into question Bsky as custodians of the primary Atproto node.
But it was not, not ever, true.

It was not true at the time, nor is it true now. The post was never deleted, which is easily verifiable: atproto.at/viewer?uri=d...

I have no idea if her making a fuss had any effect on moderators reviewing and reinstating the post if it was auto-hidden due to reports, though it seems like a reach.

The post was not deleted then, and once she found out nothing of the sort happened she could’ve deleted this baseless claim and chose not to.

I’ve no idea who that is or what they’ve done to get banned. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

We all would like to have a good website to inhabit but apparently the choices are a) nazis (+more nazis), technologists, half the artists and b) the most insufferably online people, Facebook libs and the other half of artists. Both options are unpleasant but at least bsky recognizes the problem.

I’m sure Bluesky has, as an open protocol, a way of viewing the feed for a particular user, and that would’ve dispelled any claims that a post was deleted. Auto-hiding a post based on reports (which is seemingly what happened) is not the same as deletion and not a malicious action it’s portrayed as.

Or the debate _is_ related I guess — it’s just that it’s entirely divorced from specific policies and morphed “poasters revolt” type dumb forum drama that makes acting out like this seem acceptable.

The contention is entirely outside of this, I agree. My gripe is with alleging actual malpractice and explicit infringement upon the agreement between a platform-holder and user where there’s been none, in service of further pouring fire upon an unrelated debate.

So this means you are explicitly lying about it being deleted.

Unless you are willing to remain in unending, perpetual conflict with virtually the entire social structure of the platform, staying on Twitter WILL POISON YOUR THINKING WITH BIGOTRY AND NATIVISM. It will creep in. You will start thinking in their terms because the only alternative is constant war.

They should! So sorry to hear, glad you are okay.

Thank you for making a hard decision to keep the platform operating. Hope you can withstand the storm that follows.