Kamil
@promieniowanie.bsky.social
240 followers 680 following 2.1K posts
🇵🇱 From Enslavement to Obliteration
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
promieniowanie.bsky.social
The atrocities of both the Soviet communist and Nazi regimes were crimes against humanity. Surprisingly, those who oppose the latter often whitewash the former.

Full text: www.levandehistoria.se/sites/defaul...
For some time it has been entirely conceivable to state publicly that Josef Stalin did run terror campaigns that robbed many Soviet citizens of their lives, yet at the same time created the embryo of the Soviet welfare state and defeated Hitler’s Nazi Germany. However, it has not been conceivable to even suggest that Hitler was not only the perpetrator of genocide, but also built motorways and ensured that the German people had employment. This relationship says something about the conditions under which Nazi and communist history is communicated. It is enough to look up more or less any history textbook to ascertain that the communist and Nazi leader figures and their crimes have been presented and evaluated in extremely different ways by future generations. The introductory sentences above should not be applicable to either of these cases, even if there is firm historical evidence that both dictators did actually gain significant popularity in the 1930s through promotion of economic and social development for broad swathes of the population, and in a more general sense, largescale terror activities went hand in hand with strong socio-political dynamics in terror societies like those of Nazi Germany and the communist Soviet Union. There is an immediate risk that the juxtaposition of one ‘good’ and one ‘evil’ policy makes this history appear as a zero-sum game, where the negative aspect – a regime’s unprecedented use of violence – can be balanced by or even compensated for by the aspects of that regime’s practice and results that seemed at the time or seem in hindsight to be positive. So is it not also immoral to compare communism and Nazism, as ideologies, as movements and as regimes that perpetrated crimes against humanity? Is it possible to do this without automatically arousing suspicion that the atrocities perpetrated by Hitler and the Nazi regime are to be covered up or minimised? The idea that there could be suspicions of the opposite is hardly current. One important difference is that a comparison of this nature is not as closed and conditioned as the previous one. Rather, it allows room for many more alternatives and interpretations. The thought process involved in comparing communism and Nazism is not a zero-sum game. It has every chance of leading to the conclusion that two evil things are being compared. Nonetheless, for many reflective people, the comparison is challenging, since it risks getting ‘locked’ into the fundamental difference between the good intentions and evil intentions established at the beginning of this text, and into the fear of a single-track approach that places the two regimes on a par. At the same time, this comparison is urgent and important, partly because it is carried out in practice, indeed to a greater extent in our time, and partly because it responds to a scientific need and interest in understanding and explaining the most significant phenomena of contemporary history, both individually and in their wider context. A comparison promotes both perspectives and helps us to pose new questions, establish new perspectives, and clarify unspoken assumptions in the academic community. There is an intrinsic comparative challenge in comparing the type of mass brutality ordered by Stalin and Hitler on a European battlefield hit by revolution, civil war, world war and major social upheaval.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
And there's another famous Austrian fella with a moustache, you know? He loved his volk so much that he gave his life trying to make them happy. Of course he wasn't without flaws, but don't believe all they say. Haters gonna hate because they consume filthy communist propaganda.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
Here's another notorious fella with a moustache. If you believe that he kept his daughter locked up in a dungeon for 24 years, you're a victim of a smear campaign! All right, maybe she was raped and battered once or twice, but he bought her french fries once a month. You fucking nazi liberal!
promieniowanie.bsky.social
So you wanna teach Polish "terrified liberals" about your favorite political system? The one, whose leader pacted with Hitler, who instructed NKVD to prepare its killing lists with Gestapo's help, who then invaded their country, occupied it for 50 years and contributed to death of around 1.5m people
promieniowanie.bsky.social
You can as well "discuss" with an antivaxxer. They are like dumb fucking MAGA, living in some imaginary b&w world, romanticizing Stalin and Gulag, blinded by toxic ideology. Those are exactly the fanatics who volutarily joined SS and NKVD to kill for the state. Nazis, commies, same human scum.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
You must have some serious beef with Finns, right? Did your girfriend leave you for a Finn because she was tired of living with an insecure pussy? Alternatively, you are just another dumb fucking russian troll. Maybe both?
promieniowanie.bsky.social
Damn, that guy hates the West so much, that he really believes that.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
In fact Navalny didn't "fight authoritarianism", lol. He simply opposed Putin's cleptocracy and corruption. He was a fucking chauvinist dreaming the same imperialistic wet dreams with strong nationalistic, ethnically clean Russia in mind. Fuck that guy.
daviscenter.fas.harvard.edu/insights/nav...
Navalny’s Future Russia Did Not Include Everyone
In addition to his anti-regime activism, the opposition politician often embraced nationalist positions central to beliefs espoused by Vladimir Putin, writes REECA alum Kimberly St. Julian-Varnon.
daviscenter.fas.harvard.edu
promieniowanie.bsky.social
The set design looks exciting, can't wait to watch it!
promieniowanie.bsky.social
It started shortly after - surprise! - the Soviet expansionist project had collapsed.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
Now, afer abolishing old power structures you immediately need to replace them with new ones: even more powerful, more subordinated to the one and only legal state ideology, more ruthless, more loyal. The revolutionary fire must be protected by all costs.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
...and killing or locking up all those millions who don't share the revolutionary optimism or who eventually get tired of it. That's why all communist states have overgrown and omnipotent security apparatus. They also make leaving their paradise project next to impossible. Barbed wire comes in hand.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
We're also glad that in result we're not exposed to your geopolitical opinions shaped - consciously or not - by dumb Kremlin propaganda.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
Both totalitarian regimes were perceived as a threat to the West. Both were antidemocratic, expansionist and totalitarian. Pity the west didn't have enough balls to wipe out one and then the other. Democracy is not the perfect system for military crisis management.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
1. Yes, after he had started WW2 with Hitler, 2 yrs later, all of a sudden, he enthusiastically started killing nazis too.

2. Yes, he was a murderous cunt whose immense atrocities are well documented.

3. No, western wrongdoings don't make Stalin's terror more acceptable.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
You see, Stalin was definitely not a murderer. He was a visionary politician with a few flaws. But find me a man without flaws!
promieniowanie.bsky.social
Any abuse of human rights or killing of innocent people is equally bad. Their crimes do not make Stalin's crimes less brutal.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
Is "far from the only one" your typical reply when someone mentions Adolf Hitler's racial policy in practice, or you use it only when Stalin's mass killing is on the agenda?
Reposted by Kamil
promieniowanie.bsky.social
☭☭☭☭ Soviet crimes? Collectivisation? Katyń? Deportations? NKVD? Gulag? Lol, you've all been brainwashed by the CIA, I'm tellin' you, here's the proof that Stalin was a role model for Ghandi. Check mate you nazi liberal ☭☭☭☭
Fucking pedo stalin right before he does his usual obscenities with minors.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
☭☭☭☭ Soviet crimes? Collectivisation? Katyń? Deportations? NKVD? Gulag? Lol, you've all been brainwashed by the CIA, I'm tellin' you, here's the proof that Stalin was a role model for Ghandi. Check mate you nazi liberal ☭☭☭☭
Fucking pedo stalin right before he does his usual obscenities with minors.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
And 10s of thousands fought the soviet occupant after 1945, that's why Stalin murdered and persecuted Polish patriots who fought Nazis.
promieniowanie.bsky.social
Says who? Lava monster?
One of the most paralyzing tools of the provocation is “the disproportion in the treatment of Nazi crimes and Communist crimes [which] has no moral basis, only a political one” (19). But “where, in what book of divine or human law, is it stated that persecution for one’s race or nationality is a greater crime than persecution for one’s social origin, religion, or views?” (21). Nowhere it does. A political calculation, indeed putative Realpolitik, to facilitate a “peaceful co-existence” with the Soviets, dictated this noxiously dichotomous, selective sensitivity to universal victimhood. Yet, the Communist deception rendered any elucidation of a realistic course of action impossible. “Any policy, if considered as the art of predicting the future and influencing historical developments, has to be based on a knowledge of the past. Once this past is falsified, once historical facts are replaced by invented facts, once reality is adjusted to the current form of wishful thinking, such a ‘Realpolitik’ may easily become a completely unrealistic policy” (19). The elimination of the historical perspective by the Communists “allows them endlessly to repeat the same tactics.”