proximalmutari.bsky.social
@proximalmutari.bsky.social
Kinda? There's been a few cases were profs, students, and orgs single out specific identified individuals for criticism and disparagement, often in vile terms.

Oft it involves speech abt a person, on the open net, rather than directly at a person. Dunno how that affects the severe/perv stand.
December 28, 2025 at 2:37 AM
"Respectfully, I think the ACLU should be criticized for using their limited resources to fight on the side of violent illegal aliens."

Don't you see how this works yet? If you care about civil rights, you can't make exceptions for terrible people.
December 27, 2025 at 3:11 AM
This is what happens when you keep falling for 屍解 scams.
December 16, 2025 at 1:26 AM
Cutting them off from payment processors

@maggiemcneill.bsky.social makes the case better than I could
reason.com/2020/12/10/v...
Visa and Mastercard Submit to Politicians Trying To Put the Squeeze on Pornhub
Neither company will accept charges for Pornhub purchases going forward.
reason.com
October 31, 2025 at 10:16 PM
Are there any changes that could be made so adoption is no longer the exvlusively the domain of the wealthy and privileged, without compromising the child's safety?
October 16, 2025 at 1:32 AM
No chicken powder?
September 22, 2025 at 3:52 AM
Doesn't seem like a fair description of Billy Binion or Nicco Perino (the screen shotted)
September 19, 2025 at 10:52 AM
Censorious about censorial
September 12, 2025 at 8:43 PM
I wouldn't go that far. Plenty of political movements have been stopped with violence, sometimes even with great justification.
September 10, 2025 at 7:52 PM
It's verbatim.
September 10, 2025 at 7:34 PM
It does endorse it, though.
September 10, 2025 at 7:33 PM
I spent too much time looking up a recipe for Kawhi.
September 10, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Any thoughts about this endorsement of political violence from July?
bsky.app/profile/kenw...
September 10, 2025 at 7:27 PM
We're just going to ignore the entire travesty that's the intersection of criminal justice and science?
September 8, 2025 at 12:17 AM
I hope you're being descriptive and not normative, because the only way this is in shouting distance of the incitement exception is your an adherent of the Trump-Clarence Thomas school of 1st amendment thought.
September 3, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Nah, its the rate for late teens and 20s. Not like children. Aside from thd economics, its criminogenic and not great for political stability.
August 11, 2025 at 7:23 PM
I'm trying to find the right idiom for this, but nothing seems quite right. Idk if you're allowed to play around with 熟语,but if can, I'd say they're 挂狗头卖羊肉。

Free advertising with a rage bait trend piece!
August 11, 2025 at 7:16 PM
Wasn't there a negligent publication case about a mushroom foraging guide written by ai?
August 7, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Yeah, I get that.

There's seemingly a disagreement on whose response speech you can describe as censorial based on political valance.

It's a messy concept, so I'm probably not understanding something.
August 7, 2025 at 5:19 AM
If student B is calling for state university to punish student A for protected speech, it seems fair to describe student B as trying to supress speech, no?

It's just like Moms for Liberty petitioning the government to shut down drag shows.
August 7, 2025 at 5:13 AM
一座皇宫没有酒池肉林不可能叫皇宫。

–司马迁
– 斯考特 迈克尔
August 3, 2025 at 12:49 AM
Is it hard to get a venue for these kind of things?
August 2, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Come on, men! Time to sign up and get a
August 2, 2025 at 2:24 PM
I'm telling you, Rhonda Santis needs to be an act now.
August 1, 2025 at 4:39 AM