In a world that hadn't jumped the shark, this would be immediate grounds for the university's accreditation to be placed under careful scrutiny.

Comment made in replies:

Context is important. Instructor is a trans woman. Student is daughter of a lawyer who defended J6 rioters and is active in GOP politics. (That's how she could get governor and GOP pols involved w/in 4 hours.) Lawyer mom now on X calling for a ban on all trans profs.

I also have some soft velveteen microfiber blankets in 3 sizes, 40x30, 60x50 and 80x60.

Great one of a kind christmas presents

shop now at johnniejaedesigns.store

#Cybermonday #shopnative #shopsmall

"Now Kris, we talked about this. Angel shapes in the snow don't count."

Right? It would have been seen as a win just a few years ago, but now? I don't see it.

Based on our analysis, Sacks kept 449 stakes in AI-related co's. Of those, 438 stakes were classified as SaaS or hardware, despite having AI connections. Those co's could benefit as Sacks continues to influence US AI policy.

Read more in the full story here: www.nytimes.com/2025/11/30/t...

One investment designated as "SaaS" — and not AI — was Palantir. It represents one of Sacks' largest investments, representing more than 1.8% of his total assets. He held onto his Palantir stake.

On the right is the first message that greets someone visiting Palantir's website.

We looked at every one of these companies listed as SaaS (aka software as a service) or hardware. It's unclear why they were delineated separate of Sacks' AI stakes, but he kept all these investments.

Some of these "SaaS" companies literally had AI in their names: Freeplay AI, Advocate AI, etc.