Could be, I don’t know, it’s an interesting hypothesis, but that kind of conflates zero-sum thinking with other-regarding motivations— one doesn’t logically follow from the other

That’s a quantitative issue. Zero-sum thinking likely isn’t binary, it likely exists on a continuum and we’re more likely to see it when it fits our interests, and undermine it when it doesn’t

A preprint of this work can be found here: osf.io/preprints/ps... (10/10).

In follow-up work, we will examine sources of interdependence, shared fate, and cooperation (1) among dyads to study bidirectional (i.e., partner) effects, (2) whether shared fate guides partner-choice decisions, and (3) consequences for social integration & wellbeing (9/10).

Combined, results support the hypothesis that shared fate provides a proximate solution to partner choice dilemmas: Help partners to the extent that one has a positive stake in their welfare (8/10).

Finally, we show in a follow-up study with a subset of participants (N = 36, Obs. = 108) that shared fate is associated with helping more often in the past two weeks, and actual helping behavior (i.e., forgoing money to purchase a pound of rice for targets) (7/10).