Question is how to mobilise a unified and robust democratic response. Key is ensuring AI is not working solely for the benefit of its billionaire owners. AI must have a host of checks and balances. Otherwise it increases its role in being part of the problem and has the potential to amplify harm.

The response from Kristi Noem here is the very definition of subversive behaviour. She is subverting the systems meant to establish truth.

Don't give them oxygen by sharing their toxicity.

Oh I know. I'm responding to the lie.

Video shows he fired in pure anger. There was absolutely no need for that response. They were no threat.

Resources. Resources. Resources. On a rapidly changing planet.

Well done for speaking out, something which there is a distinct absence of right now.

It's a resource grab and gives licence to other powerful countries to do the same. You'd wonder if that has been agreed behind closed doors.

What a crazy world we have landed in

Absolutely not

Hard to believe that this comment is coming from a home office department under a Labour government. Labour would do better to align to their social practice remit rather than try to stem the unstoppable baying of the racist, blame-everyone-else, right- wing culture that is so prevalent now.

Oh dear. Autocorrect strikes again. Should say degrowth

The only hope is regrowth and living within planetary boundaries.

There are various simple and inexpensive methods of reducing bird fatalities from windmills. Not so much with decarbonising the perfect planet.

That should be extended to all wind turbines. A really simple solution if it works.

100% . It's always about controlling resources.

It's the countries least responsible for climate change who suffer the most.