🔗 linktr.ee/alphapup.gio
I’m not talking about cutting off a finger, branding, marking, drugging, FGM or forced sterilisation…
…but a situation where people decide the principles above don’t apply.
Can you guess?
I’m not talking about cutting off a finger, branding, marking, drugging, FGM or forced sterilisation…
…but a situation where people decide the principles above don’t apply.
Can you guess?
Imagine justifying that decision by appealing to the approval of others - friends, family, respected figures…
Imagine their endorsement enabling an exception to consent and bodily autonomy because of tradition or the status quo.
Imagine diluting responsibility because the harm is normalised.
Imagine justifying that decision by appealing to the approval of others - friends, family, respected figures…
Imagine their endorsement enabling an exception to consent and bodily autonomy because of tradition or the status quo.
Imagine diluting responsibility because the harm is normalised.
Imagine altering a healthy part of that person’s body in a way that changes the extent of their capacity to feel.
Imagine basing this decision on an unchosen characteristic for one group, where it would be abhorrent for another.
Imagine altering a healthy part of that person’s body in a way that changes the extent of their capacity to feel.
Imagine basing this decision on an unchosen characteristic for one group, where it would be abhorrent for another.