Ever tried to “step up a dimension” of time?
If spacetime is a unified field, this 👇🏻 picture isn’t just a light cone, it’s a time cone.
I see two dimensions of time: an axis of past/future, and the flat plane of now.
What’s your definition of a dimension?🤷🏻♂️
What do you see?👇🏻
Ever tried to “step up a dimension” of time?
If spacetime is a unified field, this 👇🏻 picture isn’t just a light cone, it’s a time cone.
I see two dimensions of time: an axis of past/future, and the flat plane of now.
What’s your definition of a dimension?🤷🏻♂️
What do you see?👇🏻
If the answer is yes, then you’re already a five-dimensionalist.
If the answer is yes, then you’re already a five-dimensionalist.
Not because it’s mystical, but because it’s obvious and overlooked.
In a five-dimensional framework, the fifth dimension isn’t exotic or hidden.
It’s simply now, a time dimension distinct from the past.
So here’s the test.
Not because it’s mystical, but because it’s obvious and overlooked.
In a five-dimensional framework, the fifth dimension isn’t exotic or hidden.
It’s simply now, a time dimension distinct from the past.
So here’s the test.
Now is immediate, singular, unmeasurable. It’s where experience actually happens.
“Right now is right now.”
That sounds trivial, but it isn’t. It’s pointing at something fundamental.
Now is immediate, singular, unmeasurable. It’s where experience actually happens.
“Right now is right now.”
That sounds trivial, but it isn’t. It’s pointing at something fundamental.
We already know this. We’re just so familiar with it that we don’t notice it.
One time dimension is what we call the past.
The other is what we call now.
They are not the same thing.
We already know this. We’re just so familiar with it that we don’t notice it.
One time dimension is what we call the past.
The other is what we call now.
They are not the same thing.
I have an idea I’m calling the ‘Time Field Hypothesis’.
It posits a time field—conceptually inverse to Einstein’s gravitational field.
Where gravity curves spacetime inward, the time field flows it forward.
It’s the rubber sheet—not the balls
Makes sense? 🤷🏻♂️
I can answer Q’s..
I have an idea I’m calling the ‘Time Field Hypothesis’.
It posits a time field—conceptually inverse to Einstein’s gravitational field.
Where gravity curves spacetime inward, the time field flows it forward.
It’s the rubber sheet—not the balls
Makes sense? 🤷🏻♂️
I can answer Q’s..
I have a question for you both:
Preamble: Consider a future where you wish to train your personalised AI on as much data as possible about you.
Question: As a writer, and thinker, what percentage of your written words have been erased from history by your own hand? You barbarian!
I have a question for you both:
Preamble: Consider a future where you wish to train your personalised AI on as much data as possible about you.
Question: As a writer, and thinker, what percentage of your written words have been erased from history by your own hand? You barbarian!
BlueSky is a digital QVB (Sydneysiders will understand).
I suddenly wanted to ask what you thought of the below👇🏻 attempt to explain ‘this’, but you were gone. 😵
I briefly considered that I’d woken in one of the many worlds where you strayed too far from your current path. 😵💫
BlueSky is a digital QVB (Sydneysiders will understand).
I suddenly wanted to ask what you thought of the below👇🏻 attempt to explain ‘this’, but you were gone. 😵
I briefly considered that I’d woken in one of the many worlds where you strayed too far from your current path. 😵💫
Clue three: From Einstein himself—he could never define now. The present moment doesn’t exist within the 4D framework of spacetime. There is no ‘now’ in four-dimensional…
Clue three: From Einstein himself—he could never define now. The present moment doesn’t exist within the 4D framework of spacetime. There is no ‘now’ in four-dimensional…