Something about how a teenage son started working out but it's just a phase so it won't have any physical consequences

Thanks for sharing this. I'm a student learning maths mostly for the sake of physics and, much like your younger self, avoiding algebraic geometry like the plague. But maybe I should give it a shot 🥲

I think you meant Q is dense in R

Natural Language Processing

I feel this in my soul

I think I understand, thanks!

It seems like this can be used to argue that any ontological argument contradicts itself, but the Stanford Encyclopedia claims no such argument has been found. Am I (a beginner in both logic and ontological arguments) misunderstanding? plato.stanford.edu/entries/onto...

The domain of f would give the shape of S wouldn't it? Maybe the question is more interesting if instead of f we are given h = f ∘ c where c : [0, 1] → ∂S is a parametrisation of ∂S.