I never understand why people object to the notion of a possible world. Is a probability space silly/useless?

see rich text facets: docs.bsky.app/docs/advance...

jjj

It more that Wikidata doesn’t “know” very much about philosophy of music. And the LLM is instructed to not venture out beyond what was extracted from Wikidata.

Built with the constraints of being free, truthful, and easy to generalize, it leverages publicly available APIs and services. It was designed to operate without any paid infrastructure, using open-source technologies for both querying and content generation. And just for fun to play with some AI.

It then leverages the OpenAI API to convert the raw RDF data into grammatically correct posts. The atproto API interfaces with Bluesky to post the generated content.

Written in Python, the bot uses SPARQLWrapper to query Wikidata, a large open knowledge graph containing structured data on philosophical entities in RDF format.

The raw data is then fed to a large language model, which formats it into a polished, grammatically correct post following specific guidelines. The fact is then automatically posted on Bluesky.

It randomly selects a type of philosophy-related entity (like a philosopher or philosophical concept). Then picks an entity from that category and chooses a random relation to extract a fact...

See Augustine's De Magistro. Translation from King, P. 1995. 𝘈𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳. Hackett Publishing Company (p. 112).

related (kind of): what is chess notation, mathematically. semprag.org/index.php/sp...

I’m thinking e.g. about the different issues addressed in these two volumes

philpapers.org/rec/BURMNE-2

philarchive.org/rec/BALTSO-32

Both issues you are discussing fall under “metasemantics,” as they concern the grounds that determine meaning. There is another use of “metasemantics” that addresses issues related to the aims of semantic theory and the form a theory must take, etc. I prefer to call the latter “semantic metatheory”

I get flux; not sure how to interpret these numbers. But 👀

Why isn’t the tree more like this? might[[should [Robert leave]]] (Just curious if your stipulation of the modal operating on the modal is plausible? If it’s just cuz that’s the question, then fine. )