Rachel Casey
@rachelcasey.bsky.social
42 followers 32 following 10 posts
Policy Adviser at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation @jrf-uk.bsky.social Posting about poverty, inequality, communities and places. From the Potteries, Stoke-on-Trent, views my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Rachel Casey
ellieharwood.bsky.social
A good read on plans to cut UC health entitlement and increase conditionality for ill and disabled young people on low incomes.

Personally, I think this will create additional barriers for many disabled young people. The harm done by deeper poverty can't be offset by a supportive work coach.
jrf-uk.bsky.social
The Pathways to Work proposals will impact young people already facing high levels of hardship - undermining the Youth Guarantee.

💭 @rachelcasey.bsky.social examines the two competing government visions for young people furthest from the labour market.

Read more: www.jrf.org.uk/work/young-p...
Young people caught in crosshairs of health and disability reforms
The Pathways to Work green paper proposals will impact young people already experiencing high levels of hardship, undermining the policy intent that underpins the Youth Guarantee.
www.jrf.org.uk
rachelcasey.bsky.social
✅Young people with health conditions should be offered more support to move into work or learning.

❌Doing so does not have to be contingent on cutting their benefits or imposing punitive conditionality (2/3)
rachelcasey.bsky.social
The Government’s Get Britain Working white paper and Pathways to Work green paper present competing visions for supporting young people furthest from the labour market into employment.

Read more (1/3)⬇️
jrf-uk.bsky.social
The Pathways to Work proposals will impact young people already facing high levels of hardship - undermining the Youth Guarantee.

💭 @rachelcasey.bsky.social examines the two competing government visions for young people furthest from the labour market.

Read more: www.jrf.org.uk/work/young-p...
Young people caught in crosshairs of health and disability reforms
The Pathways to Work green paper proposals will impact young people already experiencing high levels of hardship, undermining the policy intent that underpins the Youth Guarantee.
www.jrf.org.uk
rachelcasey.bsky.social
7/ Good to see the green paper recognise some of the diverse challenges that young people face and its intention to tailor the Youth Guarantee offer to the individual's needs and aspirations. But this will be undermined by the changes set out in the green paper.
rachelcasey.bsky.social
6/The young people we spoke to as part of developing this work are experiencing high levels of hardship and multiple unmet need, including health conditions. Social security is a vital lifeline, albeit an extremely inadequate one. And, no, they can’t live on £70 a week bsky.app/profile/bbcn...
bbcnewsnight.bsky.social
“Could you live on £70 a week?”

“Absolutely not”

“So why do you expect young people to?”

“We won't”

@vicderbyshire.bsky.social challenges DWP minister Torsten Bell on benefits reform.

#Newsnight
rachelcasey.bsky.social
5/ In April @jrf-uk.bsky.social will publish its work on how to unlock the potential of young people furthest from the labour market. But it's not too much of a spoiler to say that the changes outlined in the green paper will make it a harder task, and it's already pretty damn hard.
rachelcasey.bsky.social
4/These changes combined will significantly impact young people who already experience unacceptably high levels of hardship. Cutting health-related UC will make it harder for them to move towards work and undermine the intention behind the Youth Guarantee. See bsky.app/profile/iain...
iainkporter.bsky.social
Our @jrf-uk.bsky.social report with Scope shows that people currently in this group (UC LWCRA) experience unacceptably high levels of hardship. Cutting health-related UC will just make people poorer and make it harder for people trying to recover from ill health or move towards work. 3/11
This chart shows different indicators of hardship for people receiving health-related Universal Credit, compared to people receiving non-health-related Universal Credit, compared to all working-age people. Indicators include, for each of those groups: % of working-age adults who are in a household that had to use a food bank in the last 12 months; % who could not afford to keep their house warm; % experiencing material deprivation; % in a food insecure household; % in a household with 'very low food security'; and % who could not afford to keep up to date with bills. Overall the chart shows these hardship indicators to be very high for people receiving non-health-related Universal Credit, but even higher still for people receiving health-related Universal Credit. Both groups show much higher levels of hardship than found for all working-age adults in the population.
rachelcasey.bsky.social
3/It also plans to raise the age for claiming PIP from 16 to 18, which will have some winners and losers but does not say who they are. However, it’s made clear that the aim of the would be to reduce expenditure.
rachelcasey.bsky.social
2/The green paper proposes delaying access to the health element of Universal Credit until age 22 to remove any “potential disincentive to work” and redirect those resources into an expanded Youth Guarantee.
rachelcasey.bsky.social
Yesterday, the Government’s launched the #PathwaystoWork green paper. It plans to create a “clearer youth phase” by changing benefit rules for young people to support its new Youth Guarantee.

Key takeaways 🧵1/7