Scott Radnitz
@radnitz.bsky.social
300 followers 200 following 11 posts
Ellison Professor of Russian and Eurasian Studies, Jackson School of International Studies, Univ. of Washington; affiliate of UW Center for an Informed Public. Post-Soviet politics, conspiracy theories, mis/disinformation. Jean Monnet Fellow, EUI 2022-23.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
radnitz.bsky.social
What if conspiracy theories were taken to their logical endpoint and put into practice as a form of governance? @mertcanbayar.bsky.social and I explore this question in our new article on the conspiracist theory of power in @cogitatiopag.bsky.social.

www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandg...
The Conspiracist Theory of Power | Article | Politics and Governance
Mert Can Bayar, Scott Radnitz
www.cogitatiopress.com
radnitz.bsky.social
My article on the stakes around mis/disinformation controversies is finally out at @poppublicsphere.bsky.social.
It is the product of my work at @eui-schuman.bsky.social with support from @stephofmann.bsky.social and inspiration from @cip.uw.edu.
poppublicsphere.bsky.social
NOW OUT ON FIRSTVIEW!!

#Contesting #Authority to #Adjudicate #Misinformation

By @radnitz.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1017/S153...
radnitz.bsky.social
And here is my favorite figure (which might make more sense in context):
radnitz.bsky.social
But does it matter who is claiming disinfo, and who is supposedly spreading it? And how does that interact with prior beliefs? We conducted survey experiments in the US and Taiwan, randomly varying the identities of the actors alleging disinformation and those supposedly spreading disinformation.
radnitz.bsky.social
Nominees are all hacks/loyalists or ideologues. Which is worse? I think ideologues, because they will damage an agency beyond what they're ordered to do. McMahon (DOE) is a loyalist. Bondi, like Gaetz--mostly loyalists. Gabbard (DNI) is both--she can (and would probably like to) do real harm.
radnitz.bsky.social
Americans who take these things for granted will get a taste for what life is like in much of the world, where the state is mostly to be avoided and citizens are left to their own devices.
radnitz.bsky.social
Most analyses are about the harm to US democracy. All true. But these appointments are also intended to damage the state --the postwar institutions that help protect public health and provide a decent standard of living, and have survived several hostile Republican administrations.
brendannyhan.bsky.social
Just so we're clear on where we are:
-The President: an authoritarian who attempted a coup
-A Secretary of Defense who defends war crimes
-A Attorney General credibly accused of sex crimes
-A Director of National Intelligence who defends Putin and Assad
-An HHS director who opposes vaccines