Big thanks for encouragement, @mathiasverraes.bsky.social 🙏

Session submitted 🚀

Even though it might sound a bit weird, it is my "dream" to speak at DDDEU (or how they say - "it's on my bucket list")😅so definitely you enormously encouraged me, @mathiasverraes.bsky.social 🙏 along with @oskardudycz.bsky.social's "DO IT" 😅

I have some ideas, sourced from blogposts :-)

@einarwh.bsky.social about "all models are equally wrong" and other proliferations of the original Box's quote - I like to "reframe" it into:

"All models are wrong (=imperfect)" and based on some observations - it invites differently to the whole journey 😅

Hence deferring strategy to name "things" might be really desirable, as "naming is framing" - then "models" (of thinking) then are constrainted just by the act of "naming".

I tried to express some thoughts on that topic too talesfrom.dev/blog/the-amb...

We were taught to think about "models" in a technical terms, whereas in the context of "understanding things", what might be truly immutable, is understanding (we can get previous and current one?). And often, this "understanding" is framed by naming ⬇️

Could you elaborate? 🙏

In other words: don't try to decouple for the sake of "decoupling" but observe what pushes back attempts of this act and sends "diagnostic signals" suggesting that "keeping them together" is a natural trait?