@redchartreuse.bsky.social
It's an AI-assisted technique I have been working on to identify biographic iconography.
Not my idea, but I gues I might be the first to do it?
🤔
Not my idea, but I gues I might be the first to do it?
🤔
May 19, 2025 at 3:24 PM
It's an AI-assisted technique I have been working on to identify biographic iconography.
Not my idea, but I gues I might be the first to do it?
🤔
Not my idea, but I gues I might be the first to do it?
🤔
I suppose Blue Lotus doesn't really fit the locale. Could be a White Water Lily
May 19, 2025 at 2:22 PM
I suppose Blue Lotus doesn't really fit the locale. Could be a White Water Lily
I ran a quick Bayesian analysis on these plants.
Yes- that is most likely a Blue Lotus, or possibly a buttercup.
We also have:
Pistachio or Laurel
Mastic or Pistachio
Pomegranate
Olive or Myrtle
Overall, this looks like a scene of a brackish estuarial zone.
Yes- that is most likely a Blue Lotus, or possibly a buttercup.
We also have:
Pistachio or Laurel
Mastic or Pistachio
Pomegranate
Olive or Myrtle
Overall, this looks like a scene of a brackish estuarial zone.
May 19, 2025 at 2:16 PM
I ran a quick Bayesian analysis on these plants.
Yes- that is most likely a Blue Lotus, or possibly a buttercup.
We also have:
Pistachio or Laurel
Mastic or Pistachio
Pomegranate
Olive or Myrtle
Overall, this looks like a scene of a brackish estuarial zone.
Yes- that is most likely a Blue Lotus, or possibly a buttercup.
We also have:
Pistachio or Laurel
Mastic or Pistachio
Pomegranate
Olive or Myrtle
Overall, this looks like a scene of a brackish estuarial zone.
Most likely a heron given location, two head feathers, and distinct neck curvature.
What other iconography is nearby?
What other iconography is nearby?
May 19, 2025 at 12:22 PM
Most likely a heron given location, two head feathers, and distinct neck curvature.
What other iconography is nearby?
What other iconography is nearby?
Nobody seemed to care about making it easy to get good grades until now.
May 19, 2025 at 1:07 AM
Nobody seemed to care about making it easy to get good grades until now.
The strangest thing is that it appears to be working.
May 17, 2025 at 10:49 PM
The strangest thing is that it appears to be working.
Sending a signal via an established channel is amazing?
I thought the issue wasn't that it was hard to press the button, but that they didn't know if it would work or would permanently break the thing.
I thought the issue wasn't that it was hard to press the button, but that they didn't know if it would work or would permanently break the thing.
May 17, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Sending a signal via an established channel is amazing?
I thought the issue wasn't that it was hard to press the button, but that they didn't know if it would work or would permanently break the thing.
I thought the issue wasn't that it was hard to press the button, but that they didn't know if it would work or would permanently break the thing.
It's a rhetorical device, like:
"Save the Planet!"
The planet doesn't need saving, we do.
In this case, climate change isn't really a hoax, but we act like it is, so what's the difference?
Decades of climate conferences and summits have failed to produce anything but empty promises.
"Save the Planet!"
The planet doesn't need saving, we do.
In this case, climate change isn't really a hoax, but we act like it is, so what's the difference?
Decades of climate conferences and summits have failed to produce anything but empty promises.
May 17, 2025 at 7:31 PM
It's a rhetorical device, like:
"Save the Planet!"
The planet doesn't need saving, we do.
In this case, climate change isn't really a hoax, but we act like it is, so what's the difference?
Decades of climate conferences and summits have failed to produce anything but empty promises.
"Save the Planet!"
The planet doesn't need saving, we do.
In this case, climate change isn't really a hoax, but we act like it is, so what's the difference?
Decades of climate conferences and summits have failed to produce anything but empty promises.
Would be considered... by whom? And when?
You're right, I am not tracking your point correctly.
Many of the brilliant founders of modern physics spoke German, French, and Russian. Very little English.
You're right, I am not tracking your point correctly.
Many of the brilliant founders of modern physics spoke German, French, and Russian. Very little English.
May 12, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Would be considered... by whom? And when?
You're right, I am not tracking your point correctly.
Many of the brilliant founders of modern physics spoke German, French, and Russian. Very little English.
You're right, I am not tracking your point correctly.
Many of the brilliant founders of modern physics spoke German, French, and Russian. Very little English.
Lmao...
sure but you need to go the other way.
Why should all these half-wits be given prestigious positions in academia?
or are you proposing we should just remove all standards?
sure but you need to go the other way.
Why should all these half-wits be given prestigious positions in academia?
or are you proposing we should just remove all standards?
May 11, 2025 at 12:43 PM
Lmao...
sure but you need to go the other way.
Why should all these half-wits be given prestigious positions in academia?
or are you proposing we should just remove all standards?
sure but you need to go the other way.
Why should all these half-wits be given prestigious positions in academia?
or are you proposing we should just remove all standards?
Go beg somewhere else.
May 11, 2025 at 12:42 PM
Go beg somewhere else.
This has nothing to do with archaeology. Go beg elsewhere.
May 11, 2025 at 12:40 PM
This has nothing to do with archaeology. Go beg elsewhere.
These so-called "skeptics" should actually be embarrassed with themselves, but instead they shamelessly double down. But, somehow, the scientific community tolerates these turds instead of shutting them down and pulling their funding.
Oh, but RFK is the problem with science. 🙄
Oh, but RFK is the problem with science. 🙄
May 9, 2025 at 5:55 PM
These so-called "skeptics" should actually be embarrassed with themselves, but instead they shamelessly double down. But, somehow, the scientific community tolerates these turds instead of shutting them down and pulling their funding.
Oh, but RFK is the problem with science. 🙄
Oh, but RFK is the problem with science. 🙄